this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2023
179 points (95.4% liked)

Enough Musk Spam

2203 readers
184 users here now

For those that have had enough of the Elon Musk worship online.

No flaming, baiting, etc. This community is intended for those opposed to the influx of Elon Musk-related advertising online. Coming here to defend Musk or his companies will not get you banned, but it likely will result in downvotes. Please use the reporting feature if you see a rule violation.

Opinions from all sides of the political spectrum are welcome here. However, we kindly ask that off-topic political discussion be kept to a minimum, so as to focus on the goal of this sub. This community is minimally moderated, so discussion and the power of upvotes/downvotes are allowed, provided lemmy.world rules are not broken.

Post links to instances of obvious Elon Musk fanboy brigading in default subreddits, lemmy/kbin communities/instances, astroturfing from Tesla/SpaceX/etc., or any articles critical of Musk, his ideas, unrealistic promises and timelines, or the working conditions at his companies.

Tesla-specific discussion can be posted here as well as our sister community /c/RealTesla.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

"Over the weekend, a glitch on the platform meant that the site removed pictures and links on posts made before December 2014. The posts showed broken links instead of the pictures and videos that were previously there.

Several users noticed the glitch, with the technologist Tom Coates among those pointing it out. Coates referred to the glitch as “epic vandalism by Musk” and suggested it could be a cost-saving exercise."

top 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 81 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Take a somewhat successful company, pay way more than it's worth and then run it into the ground through kack-handed incompetence fueled by unlimited arrogance. Only a true business genius could do that.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago (3 children)

There's idiots at my office that think this is all still some part of an elaborate plan of his.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

At best, I think it could be an actual plan of his, he was pissed when he was forced to buy Twitter after backing out, real pissed.

Maybe now he's intentionally destroying it as a way to destroy the accomplishments of those he was forced to buy it from, but he's doing it in a way that won't land him in legal trouble for intentionally destroying it.

I would believe it if it turned out to be true, but at the same time, he could simply be an extremely incompetent, super ultra mega wealthy idiot. I dunno.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Could he get in legal trouble for intentionally destroying it? It's no longer publicly traded but a private company owned by Musk. I think he's within his rights to just lay everyone off and shut it down.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I think that might be giving him too much credit, bit who knows. I don't think he'd willingly throw away that much money when he's been trying to build his brand around X for decades.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What do they think he would gain out of it?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

No idea, they think he's some king of genius meme lord. I take every opportunity to make fun of them for it when they start talk about him.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Could just be a shit plan

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Another lemmer commented on a similar post and got me thinking... Who paid for Twitter, really? It was not all Musk. I have to wonder if he got marching orders from those bankrolling him to run it into the ground. Also what got deleted? Arab Spring.

Edited for link and more better words

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Out of 46.5 billion total cost, 27 billion was out of Musk's pocket. 13 billion were bank loans, most as a leveraged buyout so technically Twitter owes the banks, but the banks do not own shares. 5.2 billion, only a little more than 10% came from other sources. The biggest is 1.89 billion from the Saudi Prince, but those are just his previously owned shares that he decided to keep. It wasn't a new investment. He obviously has influence (same as he did before the acquisition) but I doubt he's giving marching orders with less than 5% stake. https://www.ctvnews.ca/business/who-is-financing-elon-musk-s-us-44-billion-deal-to-buy-twitter-1.6100579?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

You’re thinking like a shareholder.

A very rich friend helped out a very rich man, who now owes him a favor…

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Stripping for assets and declaring bankruptcy incoming

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

They've already sold all their assets.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Not many assets to strip.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's like someone who feels like there are some communication issues with their spouse go to marriage counseling and it somehow ends up with their house blown up. There was some struggle, but somehow the help turned it into a mess of an entirely different scale.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Talking a traffic ticket down to Murder 1

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 year ago (2 children)

He must be incredibly shocked that nothing else he’s tried has caused it’s complete collapse yet. I guess just deleting it is all that is left.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (9 children)

He MUST have some ulterior motive.

Nobody could fuck up this comprehensively by accident, even roling dice to make his decisions he would have to roll the random good idea.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago

His other companies literally have "handlers" for him so he doesn't fuck everything up, redirect his attention, etc

Twitter doesn't, so when he spouts a stupid idea they just start doing it

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

"Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity." —Robert J. Hanlon

More likely, Musk drank his own kool-aid and makes snap decisions believing he's a genius that will invariably succeed, and no one is able to talk him out of his own hubris.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But surely he would have to make atleast 1 excellent snap decision. Even if it was an accident.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Maybe...

But there is a "flavour" of "stable genius" that is really just being arrogantly contrarian.

And, if you're surrounded by people around you giving you generally good advice, and your schtick is to say "when the crowd zigs, I zag", then you're doomed to be making generally bad decisions.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I still believe that he is running it into the ground out of a combination of childish pride and demands from his authoritarian financiers in Saudi Arabia.

He wanted the platform dismantled or reduced to his personal echo chamber because people were making fun of him and he couldn’t do much about it, and the regime wanted the platform under control because free communication is dangerous to their rule.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

He probably wanted to make space for more data by simulating an "accident" to avoid paying for more memory.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Why is everyone so confident that Musk can't be this stupid and incompetent?

Have you never had a clueless manager or higher up?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

That's what happens when you're so powerful that you only have bootlicking yes-men around you that applaud every stupid of your ideas. At that point everyone trying to tell you that you're wrong in some way looks like the weird one.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I'm thinking it's what red states are doing. Cutting their nose off to spite the left, so they leave.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Unlike his other ventures, Twitter was already in decline. Trump and his outrage machine was the only thing propping up the aging, relevancy-challenged platform. And in the rest of his endeavors he had competent people managing around him - an isolation and filter layer - that he's decided he doesn't need or want at X.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

Anything to distract from the fact that the $13bn debt the purchase entailed is what actually killed the business.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago

This is like a bigger version of when a millionaire wraps a Ferrari around a tree.

Can’t stop staring lmao

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago

Good. If you're still on Twitter, you're part of the problem.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago

"Glitch"

Aka saving on server costs..

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

What in the fuck is a technologist? Is that what journalists are calling themselves now because they realized how embarrassing the journalist title has become?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

as if destruction wasn't his entire goal.. assuming he did this to make money is silly..

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

At this point I'm thinking destroying twitter is just a scheme to write off losses so he can sell more TLSA stock and avoid taxes.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

i think it's more about fun.. there weren't many other toys he could buy and have this much fun with.. and he's just a nasty kid who likes to destroy other people's nice things..