this post was submitted on 03 Apr 2024
107 points (93.5% liked)

movies

1746 readers
437 users here now

Warning: If the community is empty, make sure you have "English" selected in your languages in your account settings.

🔎 Find discussion threads

A community focused on discussions on movies. Besides usual movie news, the following threads are welcome

Related communities:

Show communities:

Discussion communities:

RULES

Spoilers are strictly forbidden in post titles.

Posts soliciting spoilers (endings, plot elements, twists, etc.) should contain [spoilers] in their title. Comments in these posts do not need to be hidden in spoiler MarkDown if they pertain to the title’s subject matter.

Otherwise, spoilers but must be contained in MarkDown.

2024 discussion threads

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 41 points 7 months ago (6 children)

I haven't even seen the fourth one. Don't really see the need to.

[–] [email protected] 50 points 7 months ago (3 children)

The only good thing about it is the subtext of "fuck you" to the film industry. The entire film was made out of spite and that is dripping from the script.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Yes, but it wasn't really subtext. There is a scene where they literally say warner Bros would have done this with or without us...

But yeah, fuck the film industry for the most part.

Idr the last time a decent movie came out...

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago (5 children)

Idr the last time a decent movie came out

Have you been living under a rock?

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I don't think 'subtext' is an accurate way to describe the most blatant and in your face approach to getting a point across.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 7 months ago

First 30 mins takes place in a studio full of creatives watching their life's work get torn to shreds, rehashed and commodified by out of touch executives. Idk, pretty subtle.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago

Yea it's definitely a unique vibe to watch a high-budget action film that basically doesn't really want to exist and is chucking a fit about it.

For my money, as a fan of the original (being old enough to see it in the cinemas and experience as essentially my generation's star wars IMO) ... I actually enjoyed watching it once I realised it wasn't really a proper film but some sort of riff on a feeling.

Additionally, I actually appreciated the core in-universe premise of the film, which I think gets forgotten or overshadowed by everything else about the film.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 7 months ago
[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago (5 children)

There's a fourth??!

I was reading this headline and thought they would make a fourth now. Guess I missed something, and apparently that's not a bad thing.

Why don't they make NEW stories instead of squeezing the old ones?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago

I think at this point, the film industry just makes whatever and as long as people show up to the theatre and party their streaming bills, they get away with it.

From a data perspective, we love reboots and franchising because we all watch em.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

There is no 4th matrix movie.

There is either a complete abomination of a thing masquerading as a matrix film, or a wonderful bit of protest art mocking the big studios. Which it is depends on your view.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago

It is absolutely dripping with hate for the studio. I'm honestly shocked it was released in that state.

For those who haven't seen it, the story has Neo and Trnity having been returned to the Matrix, where Neo is famous for having created "The Matrix" franshise (initially as a game).

Now the software company is out of ideas, so they've decided they need to reboot the Matrix and tell Neo that the project is moving forward with his input or without it, but that if he does it they'll give him creative control.

Then more stuff happens and it gets worse, but it has zero subtlety about how and why the film exists and that nobody involved really wanted to make it. So they make the best of a bad situation bh throwing the bird at the studio.

I appreciated that part. I highly recommend pirating the film so that the studios don't make any money off it.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago

I watch around 30 minutes and that was enough for me.

It was too painfully blatant in a way that was the opposite of entertaining.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago

Congrats I guess?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 30 points 7 months ago

However, it remains uncertain if Keanu Reeves, Carrie Anne-Moss, Laurence Fishburne, Hugo Weaving, and Jada Pinkett Smith will return

DON'T! Tell a different story set in the universe. Preferably at a different time. The stories from the Animatrix could be explored further.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 25 points 7 months ago

Money and risk aversion.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 7 months ago (5 children)

So my ex and I went to the theatres with the intention of having sex during a movie, and we picked out cabin in the woods.

We were the only people there, except for an older guy a couple rows ahead of us.

We started messing around in the beginning, but ended up stopping (kind of) and watching the whole thing. The whole premise was pretty cool, the old gods and shit.

But the matrix?

They should have stopped after the animatrix…

I just watched resurrection for the 2nd time, and holy fuck. The meta shit explaining they made the movie cause it was either them or wb is gonna do it was fuckin stupid. The whole love angle seemed SUPER stretched too…

I almost wonder if it would have been better without any of the original cast.

I also wanna know how much screen time was spent on flashbacks to previous movies.

I can’t wait to ignore abother steaming pile of shit coming out of hollywood.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Are you going to ignore another steaming pile of shit by watching it twice too?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago

The meta shit explaining they made the movie cause it was either them or wb

It was only one of them. Her sister rightly chose to stay away from it.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago

Yeah, you thought it would be great for that, but somehow they never did. What a shame.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (6 children)

This is my fandom, my holy trilogy.

The last movie was the original creator basically trying to sabotage the franchise, as was basically stated in the movie several times, and still, our late stage capitalists demand that nostalgia money from by digging up and raping the honored corpse of a brilliant and completed narrative. They won't get mine.

Still, if the l Cabin in the Woods director has any sense at all, he will attempt a reboot and tell the story through a new lense... if David Zaslav, enemy of art, labor unions, and companies actually providing products/services instead of profit by tax cheats and cheaply made "Reality" garbage lets them.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 7 months ago (6 children)

They should've stopped after the first one.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

Naw the second movie was great. Third one was okay. The fourth movie was unnecessary. Fifth one... ill hold my breath.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago

the second is in many ways one of the best sequels of all time, that's my little hill I'll die on

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I won't begrudge the Wachowskis taking an easy pay day on the sequels. They get a lot of leeway after making the fucking Matrix.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I like to watch the first movie, then look up the action scenes in the sequels on YouTube

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 7 months ago

Aggressively disinterested in another Matrix film.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 7 months ago

The last one was about literally not doing that

[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago (5 children)

I didn’t even bother watching the last one. Don’t think I’ve ever even met someone who’s seen it either… But hey, apparently it made enough to warrant another movie, so what the fuck do I know?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Are they up to fast and the furious 12 yet?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago

I didn’t even bother watching the last one.

You didn't watch Revolutions?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago

This is a tricky one as there should never have been a fourth film (or third. or second) and I'd have usually just gone "nope" and moved on, but Drew Goddard hasn't put a foot wrong as a director and his writing credits are solid (if we overlook World War Z), so for him to agree to do this suggests he's got a great idea for the franchise. So I am surprised to say, I'm quietly hopeful about this.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago (2 children)

If Lana Wachowski is executive producer how does that fit with the hypothesis of the last one being bad on purpose to kill the franchise out of desire to not make matrix movies anymore?

Also that guy Goddard has a okay-ish resume, idk. If they leave the existing plot alone and create new stuff within the universe, it may be not terrible?

But also fuck warner and zaslav, who even believes or trust them on anything anymore? First thing that comes to mind is that this must be a ploy to bundle up resurrection as an ongoing loss and claim a bigger tax break.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago (1 children)

There are two entire dialogues in the last movie that explicitly say they didn't want to remake it, and don't like the style of the time now. It's really odd to hear another one is coming.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago

For fans of the Animatrix, I made this back in high school:

https://youtu.be/gtB7xmgXSjc

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago

The only good film was the first one lol

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Y'know what? I hope they get Keanu.

I hope every actor returns, and they all half-ass it as hard as they can. I hope the whole cast does the movie sarcastically.

I hope every subsequent film from this idiot robot studio in this zombie franchise is sillier and more self-sabotaging than the last, and they keep cranking them out anyway. Let the whole thing descend into SCP cursed-VHS-tape levels of self-aware vicious condemnation. The Matrix 6 has Slavoj Zizek, as himself, explain to Agent Smith's ghost why he's an asshole, and Hugo Weaving just sits there, stone-faced, in a silly hat. The Matrix 7 is mostly Lana and whatsherface dunking on conservative bigots with an in-character Greek chorus. The Matrix 8 has Will Smith as Neo opposite Laurence Fishburne doing a Sean Connery impression, but it's all a joke at Will Smith's expense, and apparently he's into that. The Matrix 9 brings back Joey Pants for a stealth remake of Memento that's mostly satirizing later Christopher Nolan. The Matrix 10 is a stoner comedy. The Matrix 11 is animated, so that David Zaslov will erase it from existence, and the series can finally die.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›