You can't refute the argument so you just start yapping about some random opinions and move the goalposts to another continent. And then you talk about "intellectual dishonesty" lmao
All deep space mission proposals like this conveniently ignore the unsolved problems of long term radiation exposure and food supply, among many others.
"NATO encroachment" is a direct result of Russian aggression. If Russia had stayed out of Ukraine in 2014 then Ukraine would not have asked for NATO training assistance. If they had stayed out in 2022, Finland and Sweden would not be members.
You literally made no effort to understand the article
Renting a car to drive for uber doesn't sound financially sustainable in the first place
You think people only sue when necessary?
I've seen plenty of sovcit videos where white people get their windows smashed and dragged out of the car
A 1lb bag of kicking horse is about $15CAD on sale, and it lasts me 3 weeks or so
American firms and NASA have been taking this stuff seriously for decades now. Other countries not so much.
YouTube is the worst with this, because they've even gone so far as to convert older videos under 1 minute to shorts. They weren't uploaded as shorts, but now congratulations you can't scrub through the video or share a timestamped link anymore.
You clearly lack reading comprehension skills, because my argument had nothing to do with the timeline of NATO expansion