64
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Excerpt:

This detail bears repeating, as it crystallizes Republicans’ selective approach to free speech: Teachers are not required to use their trans students’ chosen pronouns, but trans teachers are expressly forbidden from using the pronouns that align with their gender. The policy appears to stand in direct violation of the First Amendment, as well as the Supreme Court’s Bostock decision, which protects LGBTQ+ workers from discrimination.

The fact that the rules for students’ chosen names apply to both cis and trans children may at first appear as merely a cynical ploy to avoid legal challenges, as anti-trans laws have consistently been blocked in federal courts in recent months. No one truly believes a teacher will face disciplinary consequences for calling a cis boy Rob without a form from his parents. Any such rules will be selectively enforced to attack gender nonconformity.

top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago

What the fucking hell is wrong with these people?

[-] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago

We know what's wrong with them already.

The question is, what do we do about them right fucking now?

[-] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

I wouldn't say this is my worst nightmare, but it's up there.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Iowa 1-upped this and made it state law

this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2023
64 points (100.0% liked)

LGBTQ+

6159 readers
28 users here now

All forms of queer news and culture. Nonsectarian and non-exclusionary.

See also this community's sister subs Feminism, Neurodivergence, Disability, and POC


Beehaw currently maintains an LGBTQ+ resource wiki, which is up to date as of July 10, 2023.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS