this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2023
873 points (97.4% liked)

politics

19120 readers
2711 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 270 points 1 year ago (1 children)

flat out fucking terrorists

[–] [email protected] 41 points 1 year ago

Always have been

[–] [email protected] 215 points 1 year ago (2 children)

FTA:

"These jurors have signed their death warrant by falsely indicting President Trump," read one post on a pro-Trump forum in response to a post including the names of jurors, which was viewed by NBC News."

What about second indictment, Pip?

[–] [email protected] 202 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I mean, honestly, the FBI or relevant SBI needs to go dig these losers out of their trailer park and throw the book at them. We cannot tolerate traitors and fascists. These people are just begging for the FO stage.

[–] [email protected] 65 points 1 year ago

Even just intimidating jurors is bad enough. Juries are the only thing keeping the courts from running roughshod through democracy is they chose to.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago

I'm sure after a year and a half Garland will allow the FBI to think about taking a look.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 45 points 1 year ago (3 children)

How did they even get this information? Shouldn’t this be pretty closely guarded? I assume there are maybe a few dozen people with their hands on it…

[–] [email protected] 50 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The names are public. Per Georgia Code Title 17. Criminal Procedure § 17-7-54 it looks like they're spelled out as part of the standard form that indictments take. Addresses aren't that hard to get once you know the name.

[–] [email protected] 43 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's just fucked up. It's like nothing in the US is considering privacy.

You're just asking for mob bosses to start killing or threatening jurors.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 156 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Great way to prove your guy is innocent. Imagine if a democrat would have released this information about pending case against Biden or Obama. Republicans vilified the email lady just for being a woman.

[–] [email protected] 58 points 1 year ago (39 children)

Republicans would be lining up all the way to Russia to crucify a Democrat who did even a fraction of what Dullard Grump bragged about on television.

load more comments (39 replies)
[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I understand you guys are frustrated by Republican hypocrisy but it is literally designed into/a selling point of conservatism.

Wilhoit's Law:

Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 129 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 69 points 1 year ago (3 children)

"We are all domestic terrorists" No republican sadly gives a shit about laws or rights anymore. They just care about power

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 110 points 1 year ago (10 children)

Violence that results from citizens being doxxed for engaging with their civic duties should carry harsh mandatory minimum sentences. This is not the same as "protesting" against government officials. They are literally engaging in stochastic terrorism, and attempting to foment domestic terrorism in the process.

What the fuck is wrong with these people, and how do we deal with this in any other way than removing them from society so they cannot harm their fellow citizens.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] [email protected] 97 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What the fuck.

We know the names of the terrorists that have done it. Track them down, arrest them, 10+ years un prison.

Ruin their shitty little lives.

Make an exapmle out of them.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 53 points 1 year ago (24 children)

What a bunch of jackasses.

Bet it was the same group that was pissed about protests at the Supreme Court Justice's houses, too.

load more comments (24 replies)
[–] [email protected] 44 points 1 year ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 42 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is the best summary I could come up with:


ATLANTA — The purported names and addresses of members of the grand jury that indicted Donald Trump and 18 of his co-defendants on state racketeering charges this week have been posted on a fringe website that often features violent rhetoric, NBC News has learned.

Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis faced racist threats ahead of the return of the indictment and additional security measures were put in place, with some employees being allowed to work from home.

The grand juror's purported addresses were spotted by Advance Democracy, Inc., a non-partisan research group founded by Daniel J. Jones, a former FBI investigator and staffer for the U.S. Senate Select Committee on Intelligence.

“It’s becoming all too commonplace to see everyday citizens performing necessary functions for our democracy being targeted with violent threats by Trump-supporting extremists," Jones said.

Advance Democracy also noted that users were posting on other social media sites the names and images of people believed to have been grand jurors.

— Advance Democracy noted that Trump supporters were "using the term ‘rigger’ in lieu of a racial slur" in posts online.


I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 year ago

Those people need special protection now. Holy fuck this is bad.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

They've already performed their duty. Silly boys can't even stochastic terrorism right.

I guess this is what the bloviating one was talking about when he twatted "if you come for me i'll come for you."

Little slow on the draw there, gordito.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It also acts as a threat that they'll do the same to jurors involved in the trial should it not go their way.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Who would have had access to this information? I bet this leak could be traced back to someone on Trump's defense team if we investigated hard enough

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago

"Post names and addresses of jurors" is a really wordy way of saying "terrorism". Because that's what this is. Someone, or a small group, is trying to use fear to affect the decision making of our society.

That is textbook terrorism.

We need to start calling this shit what it is.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago

Morons probably don't even know how to use a VPN, so they're gonna get caught and fucked and Trump won't care.

load more comments
view more: next ›