this post was submitted on 23 Mar 2024
128 points (90.5% liked)

politics

19090 readers
5769 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 60 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 44 points 7 months ago

Only now? She's already said that the only thing Hitler did wrong was expand outside Germany. They not only kept her after that but defended her, accusing critics of taking her words out of context. (The context does not actually help her in the slightest) Why is her doing the exact same thing she always does suddenly a problem?

[–] [email protected] 44 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Isn’t that a huge part of his shtick? Since when is antisemitism a problem for Ben Shapiro?

[–] [email protected] 20 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I don't know, but he and his wife are Jewish, so probably not really his shtick? I wouldn't be surprised if I'm wrong, though.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Are they? A little odd for a neo-Nazi… but then again, there were collaborators back in the day, too.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 7 months ago (1 children)

There are pick me's in every demographic

[–] [email protected] 18 points 7 months ago

Which, coincidentally, also applies to Black Conservative woman Candace Owens.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Are they? A little odd for a neo-Nazi…

Could you explain this to me? Not trying to defend Shapiro or anything, and not saying a person of Jewish descent can’t be a Neo-Nazi, but from what I know of Shapiro he seems pretty devoutly Jewish, so I don’t really get labelling him as a Neo-Nazi.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

He also seems pretty devoutly committed to the same causes the neo Nazis running the Republican party are.

In the lead up to end during World War II, many prominent Jews collaborated with the Nazis, believing it would carry them favor and save them. It did not, and they ended up in the concentration camps along with the rest of the Jews. The few that actually survived persecution after the war were reviled and were put to trial, and eventually death for their betrayal.

Shapiro is exactly this type of Craven, traiterous, backstabbing piece of shit. And I would expect nothing less from him.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 7 months ago

When you go so far right the grifters can't even use you to make money anymore.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 7 months ago (1 children)

That's funny, him getting pissed about anti-semetic ANYTHING

[–] [email protected] -2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

You know he's jewish right?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago

You think that stops his hatred? C'mon

[–] [email protected] 11 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Probably shouldn't have put her in Lady Ballers. Welp, too late to do anything about that shit.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago

It's ok, no-one's gonna watch it

[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago

Bench Pirro don’t want no competition in that sweet sweet antisemitism market

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


The Daily Wire, the right-wing media outlet co-founded by Ben Shapiro, said Friday that it had severed ties with Candace Owens, the far-right commentator who has ignited a torrent of backlash in recent months for her repeated embrace of antisemitic rhetoric.

Owens, a popular commentator notorious for promoting misinformation and conspiracy theories on a wide range of topics from vaccines to immigrants, joined The Daily Wire in 2021.

Without directly naming Shapiro, Owens responded that one “cannot serve both God and money,” a brazen dig at The Daily Wire co-founder that was drenched in an age-old antisemitic trope.

At the time, Shapiro hit back, “Candace, if you feel that taking money from The Daily Wire somehow comes between you and God, by all means quit.”

In recent days, Owens has continued to generate more controversy, liking a post on X in which a user accused a rabbi of being “drunk on Christian blood.”

Matt Walsh, another extremist commentator employed by the Nashville-based company, has demonized gay and transgender people on his program, calling for doctors who perform gender affirming care to be imprisoned or executed.


The original article contains 538 words, the summary contains 175 words. Saved 67%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!