It's the dunk tank.
This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.
Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this.
Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again
What in the absolute fuck!?
Fanon doesn't argue that decolonisation must end via the use of violence because it's his preferred position, he argues that violence is the only viable option left to the colonised in their struggle for liberation due to the colonisers intentionally closing off all other avenues to the colonised.
Violence is a legitimate form of resistance to colonization and oppression. Mandela launched an armed struggle that was legitimate, and ended it once those goals were accomplished.
Because no liberal at the time had an issue with Mandela’s methods of armed struggle.
Fanon seems to inspire something very different.
Once again, liberals love every revolution against oppressors, except for the current ones.
Wow, these people sure are worried about "anti-White racism"
Big respect to all the users on here (especially Othello) who pushed my lazy 
self to finally read Wretched of the Earth.
Another mark in the "Sneaking white nationalism through the leftie backdoor" book
I think there’s a desperate need for a lot of them to justify their existence by making 21st century American life seem equally as oppressive as actual colonial regimes (Foucault is helpful in this regard).
Unironically, JFK lmao.
My 19 year old cousin has been posting Fanon quotes in between "Glory to the Martyrs" of dead Hamas and Hezbollah fighters.
She has always been political, but reproductive rights and BLM were the main issues and with way less frequentcy. She has gone so far down the "violence is justified if you are oppressed" rabbit hole that I wouldn't even know where to start to get her de radicalized. Calling for the US and Israel to "fall" from Madison off campus student housing with no idea how much death and darkness that would be.
the "violence is justified if you are oppressed" rabbit hole
fucking WHAT? "actually the slaves/indigenous/haitians/etc should have just laid down and died uwu"
Liberal decolonization is literally Botswana. I would also argue Israel.
Tirthankar Roy is the closest you'll get to an Anti-Fanon
Yeah dude, famously non evil thing to do, try and find the easiest and simplest way to discredit one of the most important anticolonial figures in literary canon.
Steve Biko 
A Reddit link was detected in your post. Here are links to the same location on alternative frontends that protect your privacy.