this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2023
148 points (81.1% liked)

Showerthoughts

29635 readers
1592 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The best ones are thoughts that many people can relate to and they find something funny or interesting in regular stuff.

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. Avoid politics (NEW RULE as of 5 Nov 2024, trying it out)
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 64 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Not really.

Sports is the thing that would be blocked the most, since it's b&w - either you're into it, or not at all, and there are great many deal of branches of it.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago

Yup sports for me is the #1 thing I hide.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Would love to hide sports and Ami news/politics.

[–] [email protected] 57 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

The trick is nuance. Being bombarded constantly by meaningless ragebait is not healthy, but it it very important to remain informed.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 year ago (1 children)

RDJ_pointing_at_self: What counts as politics is a political question in itself, with a subjective answer melded by the hegemon. Absolutely everything can be connected to politics in some way.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Good point. Many of us didn't get to choose whether we "are political"

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Hide all memes and shitposts would be way more useful for me, personally.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Have to agree the amount of shitposts and memes on here is staggering.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Aha, looking for a political fighting arent we?/s

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

And cats. Don't forget cats.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I'm just curious how you'd define politics.

Would this filter just remove news/memes about political candidates & elections?

Would this filter remove news/memes about all government officials?

Would this filter remove anything that could considered political, including news about things like climate change? news about worker strikes? news about product boycotts? news about drag show protests? news in general?

Would this filter remove anything that 'becomes' political, like Barbie/Oppenheimer, Disney, Rage Against the Machine, Dixie Chicks, Bud Light? Or would it go further and consider all media an expression of a political viewpoint and ban all discussion of entertainment media?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think filtering out everything that doesn't make sense outside the USA would be sufficient for me.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

And things that don't make sense inside the USA, like F1 racing and soccer.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

My ideal feature would scan American news for whatever ragebait they're pushing for the week, and just block that.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

This idea does seem more doable

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

I genuinely appreciate how you put scare quotes on "becomes" in "becomes political", because it's legitimately baffling how some people think that Rage Against the Machine "wasn't political" before. Like, they literally donated their profits to the Zapatista Army of National Liberation and interviewed Subcomandante Marcos for one of their video releases! You can hardly get more political!

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's impossible to filter out politics, because lots of people think everything they disagree with is political. It's always the fault of the other side.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

I'm gay, and people who so much as allude to the fact I exist get accused of "being political"

I always find it's a certain type of person who complains about too much politics

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

we should implement tags on lemmy, that filter by tags.

i don't care about us politics and sports. i could create a filter with sports and (us & politics).

same for the nsfl / porn, add those as tags, and you can filter them.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

We should still implement tags anyway but one of the issues is that people just won't tag their stuff properly. Happens on imgur all the time. Maybe people are lazy about it or maybe they know less people will see their post but it's frustrating.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Apps can fill that gap to some degree now, but we need widespread adoption of tagging before it's very useful for this. I'm not sure lemmy itself will ever support that tbh. Reddit never had it, and there's a laundry list of issues already on the official tracker.

Maybe everyone that moderates a community that sees this could strongly consider the important tags being implemented at that level, if the C/ contains things that are difficult to filter via blocking.

As an example, there's no need for a C/ that's dedicated to knitting to mandate a political of nsfanything tag when that's not going to be part of the C/ to begin with. Not worth their time. Something a bit more generalized, like a meme C/ would be nice if they added politics tag for posts of that nature, maybe one for sexual (but not porn) subject matter, but wouldn't need an nsfl because that's not going to be allowed to begin with.

The app I use most, Connect, has filter function, but it's only as good as other users make their titles.

There's no such thing as a perfect filter though. Doesn't matter how it's implemented, there's always gaps.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

I hide because i'm not really interested in US politics.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I just want to stop hearing about US politics. You guys are so fucking obsessed it's so annoying.

Oh there's a post of a puppy falling on it's back? WELL THAT'S JOE BIBENZ FAULT!!!1!!

Like Shut. The. Fuck. Up.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

But did you know that Trump is bad?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I dont mind reading or learning more about politics, but c/politics is just an leftist circle jerk echocamber. There have been a growing amount of users noticing this as well and eventually someone will make an unbaised community for US politics. C/politics is just a infestation of all the crazies that left r/politics.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

I didn't spend much time there but r/politics always seemed more centrist liberal than leftist to me.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

There is no unbiased news, all news is biased by the views of the author, the culture of the news institution and wider society and the dominant ideologies within the society.

Now, I’m not saying this is what you meant, but often I hear people requesting unbiased news when really what they’re asking for is news that reflects their internalized ideological perspective.

It’s also used to suggest that all perspectives have the same inherent value out to suggest that all media must offer the “opposing perspective” alongside the perspective of the authors.

Not all perspectives do have equal value though, nor do they deserve equal coverage. We don’t call out flat earth whack jobs “to get their perspective” every time NASA announces a new orbital satellite launch, because we recognize that their perspective won’t provide anything of value to the discussion.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

"unbiased comunity for US politics"

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

You wish, they always get taken over by bipartsian shills. Wether they know it or not, be it themselves or the actuall political campaigners (undercover of course) be it demos or repubs, the only diference being the insane extremist shit they spew out, but the only common thing is "the other side is always wrong and deserves their rights being violated".

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Reality has a well-known liberal bias

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

"Hide posts linking to articles" (ie not OC) would be my pref

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Is there an option to filter by keyword? Not on the app I use, but is that a Lemmy/kbin/etc feature that the app just doesn’t implement? I’d love to filter any mention of:

  • Leftist/right-wing/alt-left/alt-right

  • Nazis

  • Capitalism

  • Trump

  • Trudeau

  • Biden

  • LGBT+ (let’s be honest, 99% of content mentioning it is ragebait/political/controversial in some way)

  • Gun control

  • Abortion

The list goes on. I’d probably end up with like two posts a day on my feed but damn would those posts be peaceful.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Sync for Lemmy has keyword filters, I think. Or at the very least it's on the roadmap. I haven't tried them myself yet, only back on Sync for Reddit.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Having some sort of hashtag system tied to “magazines” would allow for better filtering. The ability to filter out politics, or sports, or celebrities from your feed with one click.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

A-fucking-men

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

Hell I'll even pay for that button