this post was submitted on 07 Mar 2024

65 points (89.2% liked)

Linux

47958 readers

1624 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
No misinformation
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

[Rant] A few days ago, I asked if Mint would run okay on a Lenovo T460 (I appreciate all the advice). I got it working, but the installation was a big pain and I totally blame Lenovo. (lemmy.world)

submitted 8 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

71 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I got the T460 refurbished and I really didn't want to run Windows 10 on it. I last used Linux for any real length of time a good 20 years ago, so I'm pretty inexperienced with it at this point and I had to figure out how to install it myself.

They made it unreasonably difficult to first install an OS from a USB stick. I had to go into the BIOS, turn UEFI to legacy, turn off secure boot, reboot to boot from the USB stick, install Mint, then turn legacy back to UEFI to get it to boot from the hard drive. This took about 2 hours of trying to figure it out by doing a lot of forums reading.

I do not blame the Mint community or the Linux community as a whole. There is absolutely no reason that it should have been that hard to install Mint on that notebook.

I don't even think getting into the BIOS once time should be necessary, but changing a BIOS setting so you can install the OS and changing it back so you can run the OS off the internal drive is just ridiculous and I find it hard to believe Lenovo couldn't have just made it easier. I'm fairly convinced this was intentional on their part.

I'm not an IT professional or anything, but I know enough to figure this stuff out with effort, but it shouldn't have taken that effort. It should have been almost plug-and-play. This is 2024. The notebook isn't even 10 years old.

Is there actually a good reason for this or are they just kissing Microsoft's ass?

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] [email protected] 26 points 8 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

This has nothing to do with Lenovo perse, this is the average experience for every laptop I've owned which had Secure Boot turned on.

You know what is fun? Having your Dell basically bricking because Fedora starts shipping a new version of shim-x64 which completely fails the UEFI handover to bootloader. Leaving you unable to boot at all, so no chance of reaching rescue mode. Then more fun times of booting a live environment from a usb stick after going through the same hoops you went through, finding out how to decrypt your BTRFS partitions, manually mounting and chrooting them so you can finally downgrade the offending package.

Linux and Secure Boot just isn't a great combination if you ask me.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 8 months ago (1 children)

That sounds pretty awful, sorry that you went through that.

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] [email protected] 17 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (4 children)

It's impossible to make the situation with BIOS easier. Incorrect boot order and secure boot are enabled by default for security and Windows compatibility reasons. Though I never heard that it's required to turn on legacy mode and change it back. Probably it's a highly model-specific thing. And btw secure boot is Mint's fault. It just doesn't support it yet

[–] [email protected] 14 points 8 months ago (2 children)

It’s not even machine specific. UEFI vs legacy bios boot mode is universally supported in all but the latest systems. If OP had to switch to legacy boot mode then they probably made the USB “incorrectly”. You’d run into the same issue on windows if you made the USB boot drive for legacy bios mode.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago

Idk. I use Etcher and it never asks for any modes. Rufus is different though

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago

I'd love to know what I did wrong if you can tell me. I used Etcher like the instructions on Mint's website told me to.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

And btw secure boot is Mint’s fault. It just doesn’t support it yet

Not the case. I'm typing this on a Surface laptop running Mint with Secure Boot enabled. Even the bootable Mint USB can be run with Secure Boot turned on.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago

Hmm then I guess I made a mistake

load more comments (2 replies)

[–] [email protected] 13 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

This sounds like it was strictly the fault of the USB load. If you make a UEFI USB (you should use Ventoy, it's great btw) all you would need to do is shut off Secure Boot and install.

Most bootable drives don't support Secure Boot. You turn it off, do the install, and turn it back on if you want it. I personally just leave it off.

Outside of those caveats everything you described is industry-standard stuff. Nothing to do with Lenovo.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Being unable to boot from a USB drive in UEFI mode sounds like a Mint problem. I just booted from an Ubuntu LTS USB on a similar machine, installed with all default BIOS. Haven't touched Secure Boot either. No trouble.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Hm. Maybe I should have tried a different flavor of Linux in terms of ease of install. But Mint seemed like the best choice for me and now that it's actually up and running, it's fine.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 8 months ago (1 children)

By all means, if it works already, don't fuck with it.

This community hates on Ubuntu but these are the kinds of corner cases that can make or break a new user's journey. Experienced users can resolve those with no emotion and we often discount the difficulty and importance of such issues to less experienced users. There's been a lot of work put in Ubuntu to tackle these kinds of issues - paper cuts. Recall the One Hundred Paper Cuts project. This is why I won't stop recommending Ubuntu LTS for new users.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago

It's good to know for the future if nothing else, so I appreciate it.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (4 children)

I had to go into the BIOS, turn UEFI to legacy, turn off secure boot, reboot to boot from the USB stick, install Mint, then turn legacy back to UEFI to get it to boot from the hard drive.

That is ridiculous and it does sound like a Lenovo problem.

I'm running Mint on a Surface Laptop (which was difficult to install because Microsoft), but getting Secure Boot working only required changing the UEFI settings to allow non-Microsoft Secure Boot certificates. With that set Mint boots just fine both with Secure Boot enabled and disabled. So do USB installation ISOs.

Secure Boot can still be a pain. To get Virtualbox working with it enabled required signing several kernel modules which took a while to figure out.

Mint is great though. After distrohopping for years I finally decided I wanted to just use the OS and GUI, not play around with them and I came back to Mint. The latest versions of Mint just work and work for years once they're installed. For me, going back to Windows (especially W11) feels like punishment. I hope you enjoy the switch.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Admittedly, I've only been able to play with it on and off today, but I am really liking it so far (except Firefox, which apparently no longer has a compact mode). I've had to use Macs for years for work reasons, but I don't have to anymore and I said to myself that when my ancient Macbook died, I would replace it with something that runs Linux. MacOS is okay, not terrific (I hate how much RAM it uses though). I don't mind using it, but I am not going to pay Apple's prices now that I don't have to just because it's less annoying than Windows. So Linux is the perfect answer!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago

MacOS is okay, not terrific (I hate how much RAM it uses though).

On that note, I've been amazed how well Mint works with just 8GB of memory. I've had Firefox and Chrome running with plenty of open tabs, Thunderbird, Libreoffice Calc, and a half dozen other programs open while running W10 in Virtualbox. Mint just takes it in stride.

load more comments (3 replies)

[–] [email protected] 9 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Wow what a ride. Congrats on making it work, I'm not sure if I wouldn't have given up at some point. Great job!

About kissing M$'s ass, don't get me started on updating the BIOS on a HP Laptop, they require you to do that in Windows cause it's the only way to get their downloader to run. So it's not only Lenovo's Laptops that don't play nice with Linux.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I didn't even want to take a chance with an HP considering how fucked up their printers are.

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Well, you shouldn't have to turn UEFI off to boot from the USB stick. That one could actually be on Mint. Or on the way the stick was created. It's been a while since I messed with this stuff but by now a typical Linux installation medium should be able to boot with UEFI.

The secure boot is enabled by default so that only signed operating systems and not some malware can boot the computer. And I guess it's legitimate to not have the keys of all the Linux distributions under the sun in there.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I'm not a secure boot expert, but it sounds like Mint should be supported anyway, according to Wikipedia:

Secure Boot is supported by Windows 8 and 8.1, Windows Server 2012 and 2012 R2, Windows 10, Windows Server 2016, 2019, and 2022, and Windows 11, VMware vSphere 6.5 and a number of Linux distributions including Fedora (since version 18), openSUSE (since version 12.3), RHEL (since version 7), CentOS (since version 7), Debian (since version 10), Ubuntu (since version 12.04.2) and Linux Mint (since version 21.3). As of January 2024, FreeBSD support is in a planning stage.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago

Support doesn't mean that their key is in there, though. It could also just mean that it has the ability to store its own key.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago

Thanks for the update <thumbs_up>

[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago (1 children)

That sounds extremely infuriating! Regarding Lenovo and Linux Mint, I actually had a very good experience with them a little over a year ago. I bought a new IdeaCentre 5i pre-built desktop tower and had zero issues installing Mint on it. All I had to do was press F12 and select to boot from the bootable USB to install, no screwing with the BIOS or anything. But I've never tried installing Linux on a laptop. I only use desktops.

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Well done. It’s a Lenovo issue. Had to do the same thing recently for a friends laptop and did the same dance.

I have some IT background so kind of knew what to look for but it still was a pita.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago

It's just so stupid. Obviously other notebooks don't have this issue. Some people are blaming Mint for not doing anything about it, but I'm still blaming Lenovo mostly.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago

You should have been able to boot from USB and install fully in UEFI mode with Secure Boot enabled, but sometimes the method you use to make the bootable USB can screw that up. I've always had good luck with Ventoy.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago (2 children)

UEFI looks like another over-complicated proprietary shit that make PC more and more locked.

load more comments (2 replies)

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

That's surprising, Thinkpad x240 owner here. With all the os i installed on it i never had to do such overcomplicated manipulation, just bios entering + boot on usb.

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago (6 children)

I don't feel like that's exclusive to Lenovo, fwiw. I have an Asus laptop, and it went like that for me installing Linux from a USB stick. It was a hassle and you're right that it seems harder than it needs to be.

I don't have any idea why it's like that, but it feels like it's a better option than someone being able to walk up to my PC/laptop/whatever and change my os just by using a thumb drive without any other hoops to go through. That's just where I stand on the issue, but you're right that it sucks for the owner/user.

load more comments (6 replies)

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I recently installed it on a t480 while distrohopping. I didn't need to turn off uefi, secure boot has been off since i got this laptop and i never turned it back on. My best guess is that you either did something wrong when making the live media, or during the installation. Next time try using ventoy, it's a really useful tool.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I'll try Ventoy next time, thanks. I just followed the install instructions on Mint's website which says to use Etcher. Maybe that's the problem.

load more comments (2 replies)

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

You probably should use uefi as it is better in a lot of ways.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago (2 children)

…what?

load more comments (2 replies)

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Edge ISO might have helped. It even supports secure boot.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I'm not familiar with Edge ISOs because I am a total novice here, but Mint's website says, "If you cannot boot or install Linux Mint because your hardware is too recent and is not properly detected, you may get better results with the “Edge” ISO image." This is 2016 hardware, so would it have applied?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Probably, sometimes I feel like some of the linux community thinks stuff made in 2015 is 'recent hardware' lol

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago

As someone who also installed Mint on a Lenovo, I feel your pain. The only difference is that I was aware of the BIOS setting before I did the install because I'd read some forum posts preparing myself for the install.

load more comments