79
We started a charity to alleviate wild fish suffering. We spent $30k trying to contact fish farmers via email. This didn't work, so we gave up. We consider the project a success. (forum.effectivealtruism.org)
submitted 6 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
31 comments fedilink hide all child comments
all 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] [email protected] 33 points 6 months ago

The comments are the best part.

And by best, I mean worst.

Thank you for trying!

We also made sure to enjoy our trip and tried some Turkish coffee and petted some of the stray cats." (Awwww),

Well, cats like fish too so this is relevant.

One thing I reflected on after learning about your experiences is the challenge of getting in touch with other, non-EA established organizations

Who knew that acting in a weird, insular manner would hinder the very thing that was attempting to be accomplished?

[-] [email protected] 36 points 6 months ago

The continuation of the stray cats thing:

One of these cats gave me fleas so I will no longer engage in petting stray cats

lol

[-] [email protected] 19 points 6 months ago

@swlabr @gerikson

"I have learned a lesson as old as time itself. Bow before my greatness."

[-] [email protected] 9 points 6 months ago

Jordan Peterson is shaking his head in dismay.

[-] [email protected] 26 points 6 months ago

@dgerard @sneerclub

i can’t believe I read this whole article. They somewhat buried the lede with the paragraphs about emailing farmers twice and that was it. Apparently shoe leather and knocking on doors was not an option. They did also go to a conference and have coffee and pet cats though!

[-] [email protected] 9 points 6 months ago

5/10, failed to sexually harass their staff

[-] [email protected] 18 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

How delightfully ineffective

(Seriously, what has Effective Altruism ever accomplished beyond buying castles?)

[-] [email protected] 28 points 6 months ago

The "malaria nets" side of it has done legitimate good, because they didn't try to reinvent the wheel from scratch, stuck to actual science and existing, well performing charitable organisations.

global poverty still gets a good portion of the EA funding, but is slowly falling out of the movement because it's boring to discuss and you can't make any dubiously effective startups out of it.

[-] [email protected] 16 points 6 months ago

sexual harrassment

[-] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago

money laundering and embezzlement

[-] [email protected] 12 points 6 months ago

TL;DR:

Overall, despite the fact that the project "failed", we see the overall experience as a positive one. Most new charities fail - that is part of the game. The important thing is to figure out as quickly as possible whether your idea is a good one, and we believe that we succeeded in doing so.

[-] [email protected] 12 points 6 months ago

the whole thing reads like a nonspecific job application to the EA-industrial-complex, actual "charity" irrelevant here

[-] [email protected] 14 points 6 months ago

Honestly, if they had taken just one evening to chill and put themselves in the shoes of the tired, overly spammed, unmotivated farmers; they would have instantly recognised that sending them a non solicited email with a nondescript, probably overly verbose request, would be the absolute worst way to go about reaching them. Save maybe for carving their message on a brick and throwing it at their main window.

It looks to me as a typical case of "not my money, so let's take things easy". I would gladly make a study on how many failed charities would have been successful, would the funding depend on some basic metric. I would even do that as a charity. For, say, 30k. πŸ™ƒ

[-] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago

Considering they only bothered to translate the landing page of their site, they prob would have emailed these farmers in english, and got promptly ignored due to that alone. I mean if you cannot even be bothered to translate into the companies (prob) primary language.

[-] [email protected] 9 points 6 months ago

Nah, at least according to their post, they translated. But if they put as much effort in translating the text as they seemingly did in everything else, it might have sounded quite awkward... πŸ˜…

[-] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago

50 bucks that they just plopped it into ChatGPT and called it a day.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

Right, missed that. Thanks for correcting me! I had only looked at the site and saw the translation buttons only worked on the main page.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

It's quite alright. Happens to anyone. I also miss stuff on a regular basis. I have, however, to salute the lemming camaraderie, it is a very nice change of tone from other platforms. πŸ™‚

[-] [email protected] 10 points 6 months ago

"We had a bad idea bad spent only 30k on it."

Great job kids, here's your "You Tried " ribbon.

[-] [email protected] 10 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Greece has no groups focused on improving fish welfare however, Charity Entrepreneurship is possibly starting a charity focused on advocating for fish welfare improvements Greece.

EAs advocating for fish welfare is about the only thing yet to be seen in this country, awesome.

If you want to influence Greece just use some of the fabled EA obsquatumatillions to buy out the left part of our two party system, they're currently in such shambles they'd barely notice, and it's not like they could do much worse with shrimp rights as a flagship issue.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Dang those donors overpaid. I'd happily run an unremarkable & ineffective email campaign for $20k

[-] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

well I mean at least they spent a reasonable amount of money. It is very easy to see hundreds to millions of K sinked to projects with similar complexity and get not much in return.

[-] [email protected] 11 points 6 months ago

the reasonable amount of money on such a non-project is closer to $0

[-] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

@dgerard Exactly. Fish deserve whatever suffering comes their way.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago

fish know what they did

[-] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

@grumpybozo @dgerard it's ok to eat fish, they don't have any feelings

[-] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

I doubt that would even pass an Eagle Scout project proposal review.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

Only Eagle Scout I know of is Ross Ulbrich, was his "do crimes, don't get caught"?

[-] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

Lil' old me (with volunteer help, ofc) installed railroad tie steps on a trail at an ecological reserve.

this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2024
79 points (100.0% liked)

SneerClub

968 readers
3 users here now

Hurling ordure at the TREACLES, especially those closely related to LessWrong.

AI-Industrial-Complex grift is fine as long as it sufficiently relates to the AI doom from the TREACLES. (Though TechTakes may be more suitable.)

This is sneer club, not debate club. Unless it's amusing debate.

[Especially don't debate the race scientists, if any sneak in - we ban and delete them as unsuitable for the server.]

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]