this post was submitted on 01 Mar 2024
484 points (93.2% liked)

Fuck Cars

9777 readers
5 users here now

This community exists as a sister community/copycat community to the r/fuckcars subreddit.

This community exists for the following reasons:

You can find the Matrix chat room for this community here.

Rules

  1. Be nice to each other. Being aggressive or inflammatory towards other users will get you banned. Name calling or obvious trolling falls under that. Hate cars, hate the system, but not people. While some drivers definitely deserve some hate, most of them didn't choose car-centric life out of free will.

  2. No bigotry or hate. Racism, transphobia, misogyny, ableism, homophobia, chauvinism, fat-shaming, body-shaming, stigmatization of people experiencing homeless or substance users, etc. are not tolerated. Don't use slurs. You can laugh at someone's fragile masculinity without associating it with their body. The correlation between car-culture and body weight is not an excuse for fat-shaming.

  3. Stay on-topic. Submissions should be on-topic to the externalities of car culture in urban development and communities globally. Posting about alternatives to cars and car culture is fine. Don't post literal car fucking.

  4. No traffic violence. Do not post depictions of traffic violence. NSFW or NSFL posts are not allowed. Gawking at crashes is not allowed. Be respectful to people who are a victim of traffic violence or otherwise traumatized by it. News articles about crashes and statistics about traffic violence are allowed. Glorifying traffic violence will get you banned.

  5. No reposts. Before sharing, check if your post isn't a repost. Reposts that add something new are fine. Reposts that are sharing content from somewhere else are fine too.

  6. No misinformation. Masks and vaccines save lives during a pandemic, climate change is real and anthropogenic - and denial of these and other established facts will get you banned. False or highly speculative titles will get your post deleted.

  7. No harassment. Posts that (may) cause harassment, dogpiling or brigading, intentionally or not, will be removed. Please do not post screenshots containing uncensored usernames. Actual harassment, dogpiling or brigading is a bannable offence.

Please report posts and comments that violate our rules.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 38 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I was very confused by the headline. I legitimately could not understand what it was saying. Then I saw the website.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 8 months ago (1 children)

honestly it might be feasible it's not like the driver could see that there is a stowaway

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago

That's true. Those trucks are huge.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

I can't believe gas prices are only $3/gallon. That needs to be at least $20/gallon to make any dent in this climate catastrophe

Where's the party that is running on a platform of gradually increasing the gas prices to $99/gallon and beyond?

[–] [email protected] 30 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Yes, punish us poor people who have no other option than to commute instead of the mega-corporstions. Good thinking.

[–] [email protected] 51 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Car dependency punishes poor people. The solution is viable alternatives, for which having fewer cars is often very beneficial.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Raising the gas prices 10x overnight won't create those alternatives overnight, nor will it put petrol companies out of business because they pass the cost on to consumers who are mostly forced to buy gas at whatever the current price is with no other viable transportation method.

Infrastructure takes time. Sadly the US govt isn't even at the starting line for any meaningful public transit system in most cities.

If gas prices went up 10x overnight, some higher earners could switch to working from home (a positive result), but other industries such as retail don't really get that luxury.. Contributing to more wealth inequality

[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 months ago

You do realize the post here said gradually, right? Why are you strawmaning them and saying overnight?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago

No shit, I'm not saying that.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 8 months ago (27 children)

Yes, but that alternative infrastructure needs to be in place before you can start really discouraging cars with, for example, high gas prices. Raising gas prices to that extent right now in most places outside of a few major cities would just cause people not to be able to get to work.

load more comments (27 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

So because you think alternatives that don't exist should you would raise gas prices and obscene amount and put people on the streets?

I live in a small rural town where everybody commutes to their factory job and is already barely scraping by. What do you think all those people should do to stave off being homeless when they can't afford to drive?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I think the alternatives should be good enough that raising gas prices isn't a problem.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Please tell me your plan to collect all of the people spread across half of a state who commute to a central location.

Mobility enables poor people. Not all poor people live in an idealistic 15-minute city.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I don't think rural living makes sense if you're also commuting. Small towns can have good transport links to other nearby towns but I don't think it makes sense to support those who decide they want to live beyond the practical reach of public services just for the sake of it.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I understand that you're doing a thought experiment about futuristic utopias but I am talking about the current situation right now and a comment that started this chain.

People live in rural areas whether you think they should or not and raising gas prices to reduce car travel disproportionately affects those people.

Now, if there was some way for poor people to get fuel credits or something so that they're empowered with mobility maybe that would work.

We also should probably not make farming any harder than it already is.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago

It's not a utopia, it's perfectly possible if we work towards it.

And I said

live beyond the practical reach of public services just for the sake of it.

Specifically to exclude farmers

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

In 2020 according to statistics 82.66% of all americans lived in cities, not spread across half the state. Urban areas and country side should be developed differently of course.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago (2 children)

And as everyone knows, all those 82% are commuting to the same place

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago (2 children)

There are other places in the world who do this much better than the US. How about instead of assuming it's impossible because you haven't seen it you consider that it is, in fact, possible but the image has been designed to make it appear impossible by those benefiting from it not being done.

Also, choosing to live away from work is a choice. Suburbia is a choice, and actually one that costs more money in taxes than it makes over time, requiring it to continue to expand or admit it doesn't work. You can choose to live closer, or even choose to bike to a bus stop/train station/whatever that is positioned reasonably if things weren't designed around making car and gas company executives rich.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Also, choosing to live away from work is a choice.

Uh no in fact it's absolutely not a fucking choice for most people.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

Suburbia? Thanks for showing you have no idea what I'm talking about.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Communism. They should do a communism.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (4 children)

You have bikes and busses. Everyone does.

Of course the increase tax on carbon would directly fund giving poor people free bus tickets and bicycle maintenance

[–] [email protected] 9 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Bikes and buses are great if you go from one central location to another central location.

Do you know how long bus routes are in rural counties? Imagine the logistics of trying to collect all the adults that want to get to work.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Imagine the logistics of trying to collect all the adults that want to get to work.

we do pretty much this in my country

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

I would love to see this.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I live in a city that has 'good' transit by North American standards. It's 25km from my house to the office, and takes about half an hour to drive. If I were to take the supposedly 'good' transit, it would take 2 hours each way. That would mean that both my spouse and I would leave home before our kids even wake up, so they would have to manage getting themselves out of bed, fed, and off to school with no parent in the house, we would get home far too late to take them to any extracurricular activities, never mind making sure they eat healthy home cooked meals. I could move closer to the office, but then my COL would increase by 2-3X, meaning that all the good stuff I can afford for them now would become too expensive.

So sure, I have transit, but it's fucking useless.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago

So let's tax carbon so more people are forced to take busses and trains and it gets better for everyone

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

I live in rural Washington state. The nearest bus station from where I work is a two mile walk. The nearest bus station from where I live is a three mile walk. I live twenty miles from where I work. Biking and Bussing simply aren't feasible.

I like bikes and busses. We don't need bikes and busses to solve this problem, we need telecommuting and walkable communities.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I dont see how you can be so obtuse.

If gas was just $6/hr then there would be a ton of demand for busses. So the bus routes would expand to all the people in your area. And it would be easy to fund because the rich would be subsidizing it.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

They'd rather just leave you to suffer in poverty paying $6/gal, neither telecommuting nor busses.

Market solutions don't work. We need to do this by force.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

You started this chain claiming an unreasonable $20 minimum.
Now you're calling people obtuse? Lmao

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago

Yeah we should definitely be at $20 by now. Carbon taxing should have started increasing in the 1980s

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago

To get to my job it would require several miles of biking followed by an hour bus trip. We don't just "all have" the ability to take busses and bikes everywhere. Plus during none of that time do I have access to a bike lane, so I'd be just praying I don't get run over by some dick head

[–] [email protected] 24 points 8 months ago (2 children)

We're trying that in Canada right now, and it's making a lot of people very angry.

Those people are ignorant and wrong, but they're loud enough that even parties on the left are saying "maybe we should try something else."

It is really interesting to think about how we built our entire society around gas being insanely cheap. You can buy a gallon of it for $3, which is as much as you would pay for a large cup of coffee in most places, something which we have essentially an infinite supply of.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I've had to drive to work lately and there have been two f150s, a Silverado, an avalanche, and an escalade taking up all the unmarked parking space, with just barely not enough space for my car between them. When I biked these were never there and I don't know what we did to piss off the neighbors so bad that they would do this to me.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 months ago (1 children)

When I biked

Don't know what we did to piss off the neighbors

Answered your own question.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 8 months ago

Means you can use the carpool lane.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 51 points 8 months ago

No I posted a funny onion article

load more comments
view more: next ›