this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2024
270 points (96.9% liked)

politics

19097 readers
3072 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 104 points 8 months ago (9 children)

Always remember:

Never trust a Republican. Ever.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I assume anything from a cop or Republican is a lie until shown otherwise. So far it's turned out to be a pretty reliable philosophy.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Correlation of "if accused by a Republican, investigate that Republican for the exact thing they accuse others of".

It's absurd how often they project their own crimes.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago

They think that everyone is a garbage human like they are.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Since I see "marginalized groups should buy guns" comments constantly on Lemmy, please remember that gun sales bankroll the $18 million per year in "donations" that the gun lobby makes to the very worst Republicans.

They'll also use that gun as an excuse to kill you. That's why they're pushing the idea of "LGBT extremists" in the first place. It gives far-right fuckstains a chance to claim "I saw a pride pin and a holstered gun and thought they were going to do a mass shooting so I executed them on the street before they could".

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago (5 children)

it's real interesting that you said "you" not "us" at the start of your second paragraph. really good preface to the rest of your argument.

what the fuck industry lobby doesn't bankroll republicans?

if they're gonna kill us anyways, I see no reason not to go down fighting.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago (5 children)

I disagree with this actually. Minorities should be arming up imo, and if you're worried about putting money in Republican pockets, buy privately instead.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

I got a text yesterday from some conservative bullshit saying that I needed to vote for certain judges Trump named if I wanted to preserve voting integrity.

I needed a good laugh.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 74 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Conservative media be like:

No, we haven't actually seen it, Tom, we're just reporting it

[–] [email protected] 13 points 8 months ago

Thank you - it always do be like that with the fear-mongerers.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 49 points 8 months ago (2 children)

They don't need evidence when they have their "gut instincts".

[–] [email protected] 26 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 37 points 8 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 8 months ago (1 children)

This is amazing but also so super unfair to Ralph who's never once shown the severe brain rot required to be part of the modern Republican party .

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago
[–] [email protected] 11 points 8 months ago

Rumble or some Q-anon forum on screen would have also been acceptable lol

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago

And like their gut, their instincts are full of shit.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The most depressing thing about this is that I expect no one who actually believed there was such a trend will read this article, nor believe it if shown to them. I'm glad it was published, but for the audience likely to read it I don't think there is going to be a surprise here.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

But it is something cis people can send family who thinks this

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

That's a really good point!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago

Yeah, a lot of these people live in a conservative bubble, but loved ones can help break them out

[–] [email protected] 16 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It turns out the "gay agenda" was just a Trapper Keeper all along, they like to be organized.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

I label all my attempts to organize my schedule "the gay agenda". Nobody has the time to convert the straights, we'd have to reschedule our D&D campaign night.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 8 months ago

Right wing nutcase: "lone wolf, acting alone, yadda yadda, don't lump us in with them..."

LGBTQ nutcase: "they speak for all of them..."

[–] [email protected] 9 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I think I need someone to explain this to me ...

[–] [email protected] 22 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I think it's just our brains want to change "violent" into "violence" because there's so many attacks against that demographic.

What the headline is saying is that LGBT isn't committing terroristic attacks like Republicans claim.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Thank you, I was very confused about that until I had actually read the article. My question was actually regarding the sheer insanity of the original claim - as in, who believes that?

[–] [email protected] 12 points 8 months ago

Conservatives do it with everything.

As soon as a big story breaks, their media sphere makes outrageous claims as "just asking questions" then report that their viewers are repeating it.

By the time facts come out, they've dropped that story and are doing the same for a new one.

It all circles back to Watergate when Nixon's administration realized the only reason he had to resign, was Republican voters were listening to the same news as everyone else.

A memo from the accidentally made it into Nixon's presidential library, and from that a paper trail was found that resulted in Faux News.

That's why it's infuriating Biden wants to return to those days. Republicans weren't different back then, they just hadn't figured out how to get away with it.

Now that they have, there's no going back.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 8 months ago

A lot of anti trans rhetoric is actually basically that. “Involved in” is an amazing way to frame victims of crime as possibly perpetrators. Trans women are disproportionately involved in sexual violence, sure it’s as the victims but you don’t have to say that if you want to spin it.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

There was a mass shooting recently and hatemongers have been screeching that the shooter was trans in order to drum up anti-trans and anti-LGBTQ+ rhetoric among conservatives. This article is basically setting the record straight.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 months ago (3 children)

But ... wouldn't that include acknowledging that mass shootings are an issue? Regardless: what the actual fuck?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago

Yes but not the correct issue.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

They acknowledge it like they acknowledge climate change: exactly as much as they feel in the moment they can use it to get what they already wanted

[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Yeah cause it doesn't exist. Stop trying to get attention, you're not fooling anyone.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 8 months ago

Why would someone who is marginalized on a daily basis for just being want to increase that attention and hatred even more? I’ve known several transgendered folks who just want to get by and be left alone, not stir up more violence and hatred.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago

Took me a second to realize the title was talking about violent extremism BY LGBTQ+ and trans folks, not against them.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago

Relevant Orwell quote about Hitler:

It is a pathetic, dog-like face, the face of a man suffering under intolerable wrongs. In a rather more manly way it reproduces the expression of innumerable pictures of Christ crucified, and there is little doubt that that is how Hitler sees himself. The initial, personal cause of his grievance against the universe can only be guessed at; but at any rate the grievance is here. He is the martyr, the victim, Prometheus chained to the rock, the self-sacrificing hero who fights single-handed against impossible odds. If he were killing a mouse he would know how to make it seem like a dragon.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago

Of course. Violent far right liars will make up any bullshit they can use to be horrid little cretins. They NEED people to shit on and harm. If trans people disappeared, they would move on to another group. If all groups they say they hated vanished, they would eat one another. Hatred is the only thing they have been absolutely concrete on.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago

Shocking that a thing that never existed isn't there!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago

Sigh, this is why we’re gonna be shipped off. I hate that the dumbest failsons can just lie like this

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I think I need someone to explain this to me ...

[–] [email protected] 10 points 8 months ago

There was a mass shooting recently, and conservatives pretended it was committed by a trans person. It wasn't.

load more comments
view more: next ›