this post was submitted on 15 Feb 2024
42 points (95.7% liked)

Atheism

4045 readers
12 users here now

Community Guide


Archive Today will help you look at paywalled content the way search engines see it.


Statement of Purpose

Acceptable

Unacceptable

Depending on severity, you might be warned before adverse action is taken.

Inadvisable


Application of warnings or bans will be subject to moderator discretion. Feel free to appeal. If changes to the guidelines are necessary, they will be adjusted.


If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathizer or a resemblant of a group that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of any other group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you you will be banned on sight.

Provable means able to provide proof to the moderation, and, if necessary, to the community.

 ~ /c/nostupidquestions

If you want your space listed in this sidebar and it is especially relevant to the atheist or skeptic communities, PM DancingPickle and we'll have a look!


Connect with Atheists

Help and Support Links

Streaming Media

This is mostly YouTube at the moment. Podcasts and similar media - especially on federated platforms - may also feature here.

Orgs, Blogs, Zines

Mainstream

Bibliography

Start here...

...proceed here.

Proselytize Religion

From Reddit

As a community with an interest in providing the best resources to its members, the following wiki links are provided as historical reference until we can establish our own.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

In this episode, I speak with Anthony Magnabosco a founder and the current Executive Director of the nonprofit Street Epistemology International, an educational organization that is committed to addressing dysfunction in public and private discourse by encouraging rationality through civil conversation. Anthony has been involved with Street Epistemology since 2013, and has given dozens of talks and workshops at conferences and events domestically and internationally. Many of his conversations have been uploaded to YouTube and demonstrate how Street Epistemology can be applied to a variety of claims including ones that are spiritual, political, or societal.

top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 11 points 9 months ago

I’m involved in a lot of Street Epistemology stuff and I’ve worked with Anthony before. He’s an incredibly nice dude and also does stuff for Recovering From Religion.

I mostly do content creation and run my own SE group and I’ve done a looooot of SE. It seems simple and to most people here it isn’t revolutionary, but it’s surprisingly effective at de-escalating conversations with people whom you disagree with. It avoids the conflict nature of an argument and tends to get people to express more genuine thoughts than talking points. The method isn’t perfect and it has limits obviously, but I’d recommend everyone know it. It’s not just helpful for personal debates but it’s also helped me relate to people professionally and communicate better.

If you have questions about SE or want to run through a short session with me on discord, reply to this or DM me.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It's called "being open-minded and respectful."

[–] [email protected] 12 points 9 months ago (1 children)

That's a big part of it, but instead of attacking someones beliefs which usually triggers the backfire effect and puts someone in defense mode, instead you question someones reasons behind their belief and ask questions that make them explain why they believe and could someone use that same reasoning to come to a completely different belief. I highly recommend checking out street epistemology on YouTube.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

I'm familiar with Magnabosco and AMFCA. I was putting my tongue in my cheek.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

How was anyone supposed to get that?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I was imagining a lot of people would already know, and the rest would read the article? That's on me, my bad.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

That’s on me, my bad.

Is this tongue in cheek too and really just a dig at me, or do you actually realize that there was no way to tell?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

🤷‍♀️

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago (2 children)

How about you don't become the very people you hate and just leave everyone alone. As long as they don't try to debate you or convert you, let people be.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago

They’re always trying to convert you

“Planting seeds” and all that

Stop pretending people who still believe in Santa clause have or even follow any sort of moral high ground

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago

I haven't said or claimed to hate anyone. As for leaving people alone, I enjoy talking to people and learning about their beliefs, street epistemology isn't debating, it's a tool for having conversations where both people get to explore their reasons for holding a belief, you only focus on the reasons why and not the actual belief itself, the goal isn't to necessarily change someones mind but for them to consider why they believe something, the talks should always be civil and friendly. There are lots of good examples on YouTube of street epistemology, people typically enjoy the conversations and some will come back after they have had time to reflect to continue the conversation.