303
submitted 7 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] [email protected] 127 points 7 months ago

I don't need or want any of that AI crap in my browser. Hopefully there will be a compiler flag to disable it.

[-] [email protected] 104 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

For what it's worth... I think there are useful AI tools. For example the offline translation feature that doesn't send your content to google is something they recently introduced. I'd also like to see someone compete with a decent and open text-to-speech solution that gets wide adoption... And the idea of flagging fake reviews doesn't sound too bad (I haven't tried it.) I mean people are complaining about SEO making google unusable and fake news only ever getting more. I can see some benefit there - if done right.

But we definitely don't need a Clippy 2.0 or another smart assistant. And I don't think everything has to be embedded in a browser and make it yet more complicated and bigger, or implemented in the operating system. An add-on will probably do.

(Edit: And I sometimes don't understand Mozilla. Why not focus on their core product and make that exceptionally great? If they're already struggling... What's with all these side-projects and dabbling in AI anyways?)

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] [email protected] 21 points 7 months ago

I am very skeptical when it comes to machine learning and all the hype surrounding it, but it's not all bad. For example an improved firefox translate would be a nice feature to have. There might also be some usecases for accessibility or adblocking.

[-] [email protected] 20 points 7 months ago

In general, I agree, but it seems Mozilla is trying to do the right thing by AI. Offline translation is neat. And the Review Checker they just introduced uses AI to spot fake Amazon reviews. I think that's pretty cool.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] [email protected] 120 points 7 months ago

Can they just focus on the browser? I really don't need the AI stuff.

[-] [email protected] 50 points 7 months ago

The issue is that Firefox alone doesn't pay the bills and I'd imagine they really want to get away from being dependent on the Google deal they have.

We don't need AI stuff but if they can get some good funding from it, they can put more into the browser

[-] [email protected] 29 points 7 months ago

Arguably the issue here is that Firefox pays too many of the bills, directly from its main competitor

[-] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago

Yeah, fair I could have worded that better. Finding better ways of funding is the goal

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago

so they build the thing that pretty much everyone is running at a loss...

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] [email protected] 10 points 7 months ago

If AI stays, Mozilla would be better off to still have some irons in the fire.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 74 points 7 months ago

Focusing on FF: Yay!

Adding AI to FF: NOOOOOOOOOOOooooooooo!

[-] [email protected] 10 points 7 months ago

I mean, a local-only AI would be really cool to have, especially if they need to be competitive against Google and Microsoft with Edge who are investing significant ressources in AI and are trying various ways to integrate it into their products

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago

A browser AI to detect AI shenanigans on websites would be awesome. Let the AI wars begin!

[-] [email protected] 69 points 7 months ago

Mozilla downsizes as it ~~refocuses on Firefox and AI~~ drops multiple products and layoff 60 so that its current budget can accomodate the stratospheric compensation of its new CEO.

[-] [email protected] 55 points 7 months ago

fuuk this AI bubble. the browser is one place where ai is not needed

[-] [email protected] 13 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

One feature that is currently using a trained model for local processing is Firefox Translations. There are good use for AI that can enhance privacy, but yeah the trend of slapping AI on everything because it is trendy to do so must end.

[-] [email protected] 13 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Actually I think AI in browser could potentially become a much more effective content blocker than ad blockers like ublock in the future.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I dunno, having a free, open model made by a trusted company would be nice. I like initiatives like Mozilla Voice, this could be something similar. Probably not great if it's replacing focus on the other things though.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 39 points 7 months ago

it refocuses on Firefox

🤩

and AI

😩

[-] [email protected] 39 points 7 months ago

I love Firefox. Don't screw it up, Mozilla.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 36 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Sigh, and here I was, thinking Microsoft trying to shove its useless (to me) AI down my throat at every opportunity was annoying... Quo vadis Mozilla, what are you guys doing... :(

[-] [email protected] 11 points 7 months ago

Ai is coming either way. It’s not really avoidable, and if Mozilla were to divest from that area too they would set themselves up for failure. A few years down the road all browsers will have some sort of ai integration, perhaps large parts of the web too. If Mozilla doesn’t keep up it will just become entirely irrelevant and the internet will be fully controlled by google and its chromium bs.

Besides, what they did so far is really neat and how I would like to see ai integrated: offline translation features on your local device, not somewhere under control of some corporation. More of that please

[-] [email protected] 31 points 7 months ago

Unfortunately Mozilla's brand new CEO is a McKinsey ghoul: https://www.linkedin.com/in/chamberslaura/

[-] [email protected] 13 points 7 months ago

She spent 2 yrs at McK 20+ yrs ago - hardly a personality-defining milestone, given how a lot of business students start their career in consulting.

[-] [email protected] 15 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I mean that's pretty standard for a McKinsey ghoul:

  • Step 1: go to an ivy league college, get a business degree
  • Step 2: work for McKinsey for a few years as an associate
  • Step 3: get a job at a McKinsey client leapfrogging everyone else into management/c-suite
  • Step 4: hire McKinsey to bring their arrogant children into your org and screw things up

Everything about her subsequent career has been going from one upper management/c-suite role in a tech company to another. This is not the resume of a person who should be running a nonprofit that controls the most important open source project on the internet. But beyond that just look at what she's done in her one month at Mozilla:

    1. Massive round of layoffs
    1. "Focus on {buzzword}" where {buzzword} in this case is AI

That's straight out of the McKinsey playbook.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 30 points 7 months ago

While we resourced mozilla.social heavily to pursue this ambitious idea,

How many people do you need to administer a Mastodon instance? I'm pretty sure infosec.exchange is like one dude.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago

Didn't they have acustom ui though? Also their moderation is pretty strict

[-] [email protected] 28 points 7 months ago

Specifically, Mozilla plans to scale back its investment in a number of products, including its VPN, Relay and, somewhat remarkably, its Online Footprint Scrubber

IMO these were their best products. 🙁

Going forward, the company said in an internal memo, Mozilla will focus on bringing “trustworthy AI into Firefox.” To do so, it will bring together the teams that work on Pocket, Content and AI/Ml.

Ugh, god damn it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 21 points 7 months ago

The worst enemy of Mozilla is: Mozilla. This hasn't changed in many years.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 18 points 7 months ago

I thought they switched CEOs to focus on privacy a week or so ago?

[-] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago

The data privacy angle was just editorialized headlines, the CEO statement did not mention it.

[-] [email protected] 18 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Specifically, Mozilla plans to scale back its investment in a number of products, including its VPN, Relay and, somewhat remarkably, its Online Footprint Scrubber, which launched only a week ago.

I just purchased an annual plan for Monitor, partially to help Mozilla. I guess this is my thanks

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 13 points 7 months ago

We dont want AI or pocket you assholes. We want a secure browser. Stop wasting your money on this shit

[-] [email protected] 12 points 7 months ago

Let's skip the AI and give thunderbird some love instead. Then again, it's pretty feature complete as is. Just keep it up to date to keep running and secure.

[-] [email protected] 10 points 7 months ago

This is awful lol

[-] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago

Oh for Fox’s sake!!!

[-] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago

That interim CEO seems like they suck; I hope they don't stay.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago

Lots of immediate hate for AI, but I'm all for local AI if they keep that direction. Small models are getting really impressive, and if they have smaller, fine-tuned, specific-purpose AI over the "general purpose" LLMs, they'd be much more efficient at their jobs. I've been rocking local LLMs for a while and they've been great as a small compliment to language processing tasks in my coding.

Good text-to-speech, page summarization, contextual content blocking, translation, bias/sentiment detection, click bait detection, article re-titling, I'm sure there's many great use cases. And purely speculation,but many traditional non-llm techniques might be able to included here that were overlooked because nobody cared about AI features, that could be super lightweight and still helpful.

If it goes fully remote AI, it loses a lot of privacy cred, and positions itself really similarly to where everyone else is. From a financial perspective, bandwagoning on AI in the browser but "we won't send your data anywhere" seems like a trendy, but potentially helpful and effective way to bring in a demographic interested in it without sacrificing principles.

But there's a lot of speculation in this comment. Mozilla's done a lot for FOSS, and I get they need monetization outside of Google, but hopefully it doesn't lead things astray too hard.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


After installing a new interim CEO earlier this month, Mozilla, the organization behind the Firefox browser, is making some major changes to its product strategy, TechCrunch has learned.

Specifically, Mozilla plans to scale back its investment in a number of products, including its VPN, Relay and, somewhat remarkably, its Online Footprint Scrubber, which launched only a week ago.

Going forward, the company said in an internal memo, Mozilla will focus on bringing “trustworthy AI into Firefox.” To do so, it will bring together the teams that work on Pocket, Content and AI/Ml.

Mozilla started expanding its product portfolio in recent years, all while its flagship product, Firefox, kept losing market share.

And while the organization was often sharply criticized for this, its leadership argued that diversifying its product portfolio beyond Firefox was necessary to ensure Mozilla’s survival in the long run.

Firefox, after all, provided the vast majority of Mozilla’s income, but it also meant the organization was essentially dependent on Google to continue this deal.


The original article contains 234 words, the summary contains 166 words. Saved 29%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago

Kinda disappointing how much of the community just takes a giant 💩 on Mozilla whatever it does these days. Funding open source is super crazy hard folks. Notice that the really successful well funded projects are fueled by megacorps?

Offering constructive criticism is great but if you don't have better ideas around how to fund an open browser without selling your soul to GOOG or MSFT then perhaps your energy might be better spent elsewhere.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago

I didn't realize Lemmy hated AI so much. Pretty much every post in this thread is bashing the idea. I've found AI to be very useful personally, I use it almost every day. It helped me code a VBA macro from scratch with 0 experience. This tool is saving me and my team hundreds of hours per year. It's also great just as an improved search engine.

[-] [email protected] 16 points 7 months ago

AI is useful, we're just tired of seeing it stuffed everywhere

[-] [email protected] 11 points 7 months ago

I think the focus is more on how it's the new buzzword that companies are chasing and that most have a solution looking for a problem.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago

A reminder that there are many firefox forks that exist if base firefox is adding unwanted things or you might have different wants, but sites will still "see" firefox in terms of compatibility. I'm using Librewolf with some annoyances (it doesn't let things fingerprint to the point that it can't even get your current time), but overall I like it.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 13 Feb 2024
303 points (98.1% liked)

Technology

34415 readers
673 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS