24
submitted 7 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] [email protected] 15 points 7 months ago

Oh boy. Here we go…

[-] [email protected] 11 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I refuse to recognize MSN as a valid source. Nothing but a middleman serving ads.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago

I admire how the victims of Microsoft Windows are fed msn news directly in the comfort of their start menu

[-] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

comfort of their start menu

Thinking windows start menu is comfort is peak stockholm syndrome.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago

Now with more screenspace!

[-] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago

It's just reposting ABC News if that matters

[-] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago

It doesn't. I found the same news several times over elsewhere, covered in more detail. I appreciate the sentiment though, thank you.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

It's probably a good thing, as MSN is not a primary source (They buy their news from other agencies)

[-] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago

This is what I meant. It's an aggregator whose primary function is not to relay news but to draw people into microsoftland and/or advertise to them. To be sure, other news sites do this too, but they actually have journalists and editors and therefore (at least the pretense of) journalistic integrity.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago

Yea I bet the shooter was "antisemitic," for sure.

[-] [email protected] 11 points 7 months ago

Actual antisemitism is still a thing, and pretty common with the kind of people that would commit this kind of crime. It's a real shame that the term has been made almost useless by applying it to anyone with a principled stance against genocide.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago
[-] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago

Well that definitely isn't sus

[-] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago
[-] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago
[-] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago

A story that's interesting from a gun crime perspective. Stopped by two good guys with guns (but did they accidentally hit the shooter's child?), and the crime was committed with a gun purchased legally. It's got elements of both sides of the gun law debate, lol

[-] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago

Eh, "Good thing we had dangling pianos to drop on the guy who's been cutting all the cords on our dangling pianos" isn't quite a strong argument for the pro-dangling pianos side

[-] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

What debate? Why can such a thing as a debate exist? You’ve got a conflict of interest between children’s public health and corporate profit and we know which side is winning. Public health can’t be measured in economic terms because we lack a children’s market

this post was submitted on 12 Feb 2024
24 points (75.0% liked)

World News

32088 readers
891 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS