this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2023
207 points (97.3% liked)

politics

19088 readers
3952 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
207
A Global Web of Chinese Propaganda Leads to a U.S. Tech Mogul (www.nytimes.com)
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
29 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

The Times unraveled a financial network that stretches from Chicago to Shanghai and uses American nonprofits to push Chinese talking points worldwide.

all 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 47 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

On the surface, No Cold War is a loose collective run mostly by American and British activists who say the West’s rhetoric against China has distracted from issues like climate change and racial injustice.

In fact, a New York Times investigation found, it is part of a lavishly funded influence campaign that defends China and pushes its propaganda. At the center is a charismatic American millionaire, Neville Roy Singham, who is known as a socialist benefactor of far-left causes.

…

Mr. Singham says he does not work at the direction of the Chinese government. But the line between him and the propaganda apparatus is so blurry that he shares office space — and his groups share staff members — with a company whose goal is to educate foreigners about “the miracles that China has created on the world stage.”

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If he's so socialist and far-left, why in the world would he support China? They're politically communist in name only, and economically capitalist.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Sounds like a perfect fit, claim to be socialist actually just be a greedy capitalist.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Well even though I'm old enough where I should have already known this term, my time on lemmy has introduced me to Tankies.

My guess is this guy is a Tankie: if it has communism in it in any way shape or form then it's the most amazing thing ever and anything you say about it that would say otherwise is a dirty liberal lie.

Something like that.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is just another reason to add to the many as to why (if you ask me) we need to both

a. To kill off the rich and...

b. Kill off the CCP.

Two wicked groups colluding against the common interests of keeping the world alive just so they can remain in power.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

I'd argue the CCP certainly doesn't care about keeping the planet alive. They care about keep those who are currently in power comfortable until they die, then I doubt they give a shit what happens.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Is this illegal?

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago (2 children)

No, but it's scummy as fuck, and it's interesting that an American is pushing Chinese talking points.

I think people are pretty well aware at this point that social engineering, on a macroscale, is extremely effective at changing people's views (albeit slowly). Look at what happened with Qanon, look how many people supported that. That was the dumbest thing I've ever seen, and people are STILL backing it even after it's been proven to not only be a sham, but run by a pedophile out of Southeast Asia. Imagine the damage that can be done by a disinformation or social engineering campaign backed by one of the largest nations in the world.

We are currently in a culture war - the implications of it could change everyone's lives in the next couple of decades if we aren't careful.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Doesn’t the U.S. do this in other countries? If America does it, and it’s not illegal, why can’t China? Weird that they didn’t mention that it’s legal in the article, right?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No one said they can’t. But we can and should call out propaganda for what it is. Especially when it comes from authoritarian, genocidal, despotic governments.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

This exchange reminds me of a key and peele sketch. Not illegal, but perfectly fine to admonish china for doing the thing that the us is constantly being admonished for, mx. Whataboutism.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/azoE0bZSoGA

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source, check me out at GitHub.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

K&P are funny. It definitely is whataboutism. And China shouldn’t do it. But The NY Times fails to mention that it’s not illegal and other countries do this too. Is that good journalism?

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Its the NYT's when on the last 10-15 years have they been anything close to "journalists"?

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

But democracy dies in darkness. /s

Edit: That’s the Washington Post.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It’s scummy when the US does it.

It’s scummy when China does it.

I hope I could help you understand.

I also would love to talk about anything China without someone coming up with the Yankees. JFC.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I would like to learn more about what the U.S does to compete in the propaganda space. I worry about the fundamentally reduced agility in responding to competing powers that are much more centralized.

As far as I can tell, private industry leads American interest and since the private ownership is still spread amongst these individuals owners, there doesn't seem to be a coordinated drive to spread propaganda without a more direct linkage to profit. However in other countries with more centralized power the national power can dictate the messaging and then private companies follow suit, which allows for a much more coordinated effort.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

You are completely and utterly correct. America can’t compete. While China has 5 and 50 year plans, America is rudderless (discounting the military). Our goals change every 2 to 4 years with new administrations. This is one of the reasons I believe America will inevitably go fascist and centralize control of the government in the coming years. It can’t compete with China’s economy and outreach. So it will adapt by imitation.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think with evidence provided that they should have to register under FARA as foreign agents for China here to spread Chinese propaganda. I'm sure the writer of the article informed them.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Capitalism is global now and so is the internet. They don’t have to register because they’re not in America. The only way to stop this is to shut down the internet and isolate the country. This article is mad at China because it’s beating America with capitalism.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

https://archive.is/rIHwC

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Seems like China is doing anything and everything to avoid having its propaganda being labeled as such. No one will listen to Chinese propaganda if they know that's what it is.

All 4 of these companies should have to register under FARA or face civil penalties.

That final photo should be the nail in the coffin to force those orgs to register.