98
submitted 8 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
all 44 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] [email protected] 82 points 8 months ago

Can we call Americans who renounce their citizenship defectors too

[-] [email protected] 74 points 8 months ago

Ooh, hell yeah. Literally thousands of people are defecting from the US every year. Failed totalitarian dictatorship my people yearn for freedom no food etc etc

[-] [email protected] 62 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

As of May 15, 2023, a total of 5,315 US citizens have renounced their US citizenship in 2023. This is a significant increase from the 2,390 US citizens who renounced their citizenship in 2022. [source]

The number of North Koreans who defected to South Korea tripled last year, as the easing of border closures imposed during the Covid-19 pandemic encouraged students, women and diplomats to make the perilous journey. At 196

Why would people want to leave the greatest, most democratic country on earth? Even in relation to population the DPRK is clearly more democratic and popular if this is the unit of measurement, and this isn’t even counting the second half of 2023 for the U.S.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago

Also it's very expensive to renounce your US citizenship

[-] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago

USA has 12 times their population but 27 times (per capita) citizen renouncement rate.

[-] [email protected] 32 points 8 months ago

This is a good bit idea actually

[-] [email protected] 19 points 8 months ago

It costs money to renounce US citizenship, make of that what you will. I think it's like $500, but I'm not sure.

[-] [email protected] 33 points 8 months ago

Exactly, the Biden regime is holding dissidents hostage.

[-] [email protected] 24 points 8 months ago
[-] [email protected] 15 points 8 months ago
[-] [email protected] 14 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

You’d also have to pay exit taxes on any assets you’re bringing with you when you go, I think. I think financially the costs of renouncing far outweigh the benefits, most people who emigrate to live in other countries never renounce their citizenship.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Yep. If I lived in another country I'd want to keep my passport just in case for a lot of reasons. It would be so cool to be able to tell Uncle Sam to fuck off though.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago

What a weird way to run things. I renounced my Japanese citizenship because the Japanese Foreign Ministry was harrassing my mum about it, and we did have to go to the consulate and fill out a frankly miniscule amount of paperwork and pay no money.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

all your assets. not just the ones you take with you

The US Exit Tax, or Expatriation Tax, is levied on individuals renouncing their US citizenship or green card. Governed by IRC Section 877A, this tax is specifically designed for high-net-worth individuals. It ensures that their worldwide income and assets are taxed prior to exiting the US tax system.

EDIT: the statute is at https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/877A

[-] [email protected] 82 points 8 months ago

According to Hexbear, it’s actually the UN which is preventing North Koreans from leaving their country.

Silly Hexbears, why would they think that?

S/RES/2270:

ban on DPRK chartering of vessels and aircraft; ban on operating DPRK vessels or using DPRK flags

S/RES/2375:

Introduces a ban on Member States from providing work authorizations for DPRK nationals

S/RES/2397:

Requires countries to expel all North Korean laborers earning income abroad immediately

[-] [email protected] 36 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Where the fuck are China and Russia? These passed the security council with no veto?

[-] [email protected] 28 points 8 months ago

The U.N is a joke as is. The blowhards who preach about law and order are the same ones that sew lawlessness and disorder. With or without the existence of the U.N, the western powers would do exactly the same thing to the DPRK.

And with or without the U.N China and Russia don't actually give a shit and allow the DPRK to do exactly what they're "not allowed to do" since they share borders with them and the U.S under Biden or any president can go piss upwind if they think they can force the RF, the PRC, and the DPRK to do its bidding.

[-] [email protected] 11 points 8 months ago

They do for sure do trade with the DPRK in spite of these UNSC resolutions but surely many smaller countries that would do business with the DPRK also are discouraged by the resolutions?

[-] [email protected] 7 points 8 months ago

Not to mention Russia is going to be responsible for linking occupied Korea with the DPRK via trade over time the same way Taiwan is being brought back into the fold

[-] [email protected] 27 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Russia is not going to stick its neck out for the DPRK, it's a state run by cynical mafiosoes. The only way that the Russian Federation gives a shit about the DPRK historically is simply wanting it to keep existing as a buffer against the US and its proxies for China, which as we have seen the sanctions have not stopped.

The PRC is trying to pick its battles (you will see that in the meetings connected to these, the PRC typically strongly discouraged the measures and called them needlessly escalatory). China almost never vetoes by itself, only vetoing when someone else also does (usually Russia), probably in large part because it tries to maintain a reputation of respecting the agency of other countries and not just crassly abusing its power like the US does, which is part of why it is able to position itself as a peace broker and engage in bilateral agreements with third world nations and so on. At least, this is a charitable reading consistent with what the PRC itself says, there are other readings as well.

I think there is a decent chance of vetoes in the future based on the warming relation between the DPRK and Russia, and I expect China to also veto these sorts of measures if Russia does.

[-] [email protected] 12 points 8 months ago

I would have thought that Russia would have vetoed out of spite against the US at least, but maybe these are old enough that they still deluded themselves that they could coexist with the west?

[-] [email protected] 11 points 8 months ago

there are other readings as well.

Having the rest of the world cut North Korea off gives China exclusive access to their markets and resources?

[-] [email protected] 11 points 8 months ago

Yeah, though the DPRK is notoriously poor in terms of natural resources. It could also be the PRC flatly throwing the DPRK under the bus for realpolitik reasons (which is still like half true in the more optimistic reading).

[-] [email protected] 17 points 8 months ago

Neither of them have stellar foreign policy

[-] [email protected] 78 points 8 months ago

And also anything that indicates NK is less than perfect means you’re racist, colonialist, and white. And its not true. And it’s the CIA doing a coverup/false flag.

No, you racist dog, nobody thinks the DPRK or any other country is perfect (cue Moleman), but if you think Kim Jong Un is feeding teenagers to starving dogs for wearing the wrong haircut you're definitely a racist and that's where like 95% of the west including everyone in that thread is at.

[-] [email protected] 24 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Despite professing a fetish for nuance, they all suddenly pretend to be dumb as dogshit when describing the positions of people to the left of them, demonstrating the very inability to grasp nuance that they ascribe to their political opponents, or anyone who refuses to see the nuance in supporting genocidal fascists. They project their mindless shallow nationalism, full of platitudes and willful blindness, onto people who actually know what they're talking about. They can't imagine that the cartoonish image they have of the rest of the world is wrong, so they double down on assuming that we see what they see, and just love it. "The monstrous caricature in my head is real, and you worship it."

You can see this with chuds of all stripes. It's not that I've been lied to about the 2020 uprisings, they really did burn all those cities to the ground, and those looney leftists love it!. The world is your oyster when your epistemological starting point is "I'm obviously already right and know everything I need to know on this subject, so anyone trying to learn more about it is actually being brainwashed by The Enemy."

Like the fundamentalists who will never not be convinced that atheists worship the devil the same way they worship their god. They, the best and smartest people on Earth, cannot imagine a worldview devoid of uncritical worship, so anyone who claims to have one must be deceived, a deceiver, or both.

[-] [email protected] 23 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Precisely, but that's the strawman that people conjure up about Hexbear. We must all worship at the altar of Russia, China, Cuba and NK and they are literally infallible and can't possibly make a single bad move.

Thinking that we might have nuanced opinions on these countries, and critically analyse information to realise they're not the fucking otherworldly demons that western propaganda paints them as, takes brainpower they don't seem to spare.

[-] [email protected] 65 points 8 months ago

those damn hexbears, citing their sources. why can't they just be normal and believe complete nonsense based on reddit comments?

[-] [email protected] 59 points 8 months ago

Woaw 61 people defected to the south last year, North Korea is truly done for silly tankies smuglord

[-] [email protected] 33 points 8 months ago

The only reason 25M more people haven't followed is because North Korea Tyrannical Dictatorship Starved To Death Dog Cannon Great Wall Communist No Freedom

[-] [email protected] 48 points 8 months ago
[-] [email protected] 42 points 8 months ago

Ok but did it triple compared to the pre-covid numbers or is this compared to the post-covid numbers?

Serious question since DPRK lockdowns will have drastically reduced the number leaving the country. Thus any increase being framed as "tripled" may just be a return to normal levels.

[-] [email protected] 44 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Seoul say it tripled from 67 to 196. Where pre-pandemic levels were ~1000/year.

So it's effectively negligible, possibly even within the margin of error.

[-] [email protected] 36 points 8 months ago

LMAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

So I'm completely right then.

[-] [email protected] 29 points 8 months ago

Yeppers. Just a standard misleading and self-affirming headline amerikkka-clap

[-] [email protected] 23 points 8 months ago

That's like... People dropping off the ledger numbers.

[-] [email protected] 41 points 8 months ago

Their news comm has a rule against reproducing the article in the post yet they have a LLM bot summarize the entire thing. I sincerely doubt that they even read their own articles.

[-] [email protected] 38 points 8 months ago
[-] [email protected] 30 points 8 months ago

im renouncing my utopian ideals in favor of wanting a small chunk of earth set aside for liberals to be put in the exact dreary dystopia they make up in their stupid childish brains

[-] [email protected] 25 points 8 months ago
[-] [email protected] 16 points 8 months ago

Do I really care what a group of people old enough to be my father have to say about us?

[-] [email protected] 12 points 8 months ago

I give them three days before someone makes a “you have been banned on r/Pyongyang” joke

this post was submitted on 19 Jan 2024
98 points (100.0% liked)

the_dunk_tank

15681 readers
225 users here now

It's the dunk tank.

This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this.

Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS