this post was submitted on 17 Jan 2024
235 points (98.0% liked)

Technology

59366 readers
3899 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Beeper users say Apple is now blocking their Macs from using iMessage entirely::The Apple-versus-Beeper saga is not over yet it seems, even though the iMessage-on-Android Beeper Mini was removed from the Play Store last week. Now,

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 56 points 10 months ago (25 children)

FUCK APPLE, but they have so many people that let them ass fuck them they continue to do shits like this

[–] [email protected] 54 points 10 months ago (4 children)

Devils advocate here: it’s their webservice right? They determine who can access it.

If there were legislation that would force them to make it interoperable that would be one thing. But you can’t just demand access to their infrastructure.

[–] [email protected] 44 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

You're right - but, as Cory Doctorow points out, Apple owe their success to reverse engineering, the very thing they're busy blocking now.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 10 months ago (1 children)

They're not blocking reverse engineering. They're blocking unauthorized access to their servers.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

You're being unnecessarily pedantic. Apple was blocking interoperability and reverse engineering found a solution—and Apple is blocking that solution.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

I'm not being remotely pedantic.

Apple reverse-engineered MS standards to improve interoperability so you could open Apple files on Windows and vise versa. They didn't reverse engineer Windows security so that you could open Apple files on MS servers.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Apple reverse engineered a file format, Beeper reverse engineered a protocol.

Microsoft made several changes to try to keep Apple out, Apple's also made several changes to keep Beeper out, except now everyone's online so it's happening way faster.

It's not exactly the same kind of reverse engineering, but I never said it was. I think you've got a very narrow definition of reverse engineering in your head and you're quibbling over me using it more broadly than you would.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 36 points 10 months ago (1 children)

No one is saying what they do is illegal, people just say they are cunts.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

Exactly, dick moves don’t need to be illegal to be dick moves. It’s like the constant price/ad increases. You can, but we’re gonna bitch and encourage people to stop supporting you because it’s a dick move

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago

Agreed. Apple provides a free service locked to their hardware. It shouldn’t be surprising that they patched the vulnerabilities and blocked accounts.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (24 replies)
[–] [email protected] 51 points 10 months ago (14 children)

You know what to do, the EU Government.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

They already have

TL;DR: imessage and other big message services must be able to send messages to each other (when

[–] [email protected] 23 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

iMessage isn't included in that act, since it's not big enough in Europe.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago
[–] [email protected] 17 points 10 months ago

As said by noodlejetski, iMessage usage in the EU is very low. It hasn't been excempt completely though, it's pending investigation.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 10 months ago (3 children)

I know I’ll get downvotes for this but I switched from Android to iPhone after years and years of using Android while knowing I wouldn’t be able to use iMessage features texting Android users. While knowing I couldn’t and would likely never be easily able to sideload apps, heck even after they had already taken the headphone jack away. I literally do not care about any of that for the purpose for which I use my phone. I just want it to work, without having to endlessly tweak and customize and modify. I like that it does what it says it does out of the box and does so smoothly and reliably.

I like that it integrates well with other apple products. I have exactly 3 contacts I use the native messaging app for. The rest have all been communicating with me through Messenger or Telegram or WhatsApp for years anyway — I’d MUCH rather see governments prioritize making those services talk to each other so I could uninstall two of them but I don’t ever see anyone talking about that even though Apple haters love to bash Apple over iMessage - while ignoring that the RCS protocol Google uses has proprietary bullshit built on top of it meaning that even if Apple adopted the protocol itself the interaction between iPhone and android messages would still be messy.

As I said I know I’ll get downvotes for this but I also know I’m far from alone and this is exactly why Apple has the power it does: it gives its users what they want, even if non-Apple users don’t see it that way. I see so many arguments against Apple that fail to take that into account.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I had an iPhone 13 pro max and it was an excellent device. Everything it could do it did very well and had outstanding battery life, build quality, and cameras.

I only got rid of it because I wanted torrents and emulators. If you're aware of the limitations of iOS and you're okay with them, iPhones are really great.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I don’t think you’re supposed to post reasonable, level-headed opinions regarding Apple on here. Against the rules or something

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago

I don't understand what you mean by endlessly tweak and customize and modify. None of that is necessary by any means, which makes me question your whole preamble there.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

Tried beeper?

[–] [email protected] 12 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Why would you use an OS from a company that openly messes with everything it gives you?

ICQ died for a small fraction of what they are doing, going from the default IM (in some countries, including mine) to something with only red flowers seen in the buddylist when you launch it once a month to get that sleepy graveyard nostalgic feeling, and that happened in a few months.

Now trojans are seen as normal by people who understand that they are talking about a trojan.

We often treat "normies" as people for whom fashion\easiness is more important than the reality of what they are choosing.

But apparently it's come to the situation where they just can't escape Apple, MS, Google, others, due to knowledge lacking and being hostage to some functionality and network effects, if such mechanisms are socially relevant now.

Interesting to see this dynamic of choosing protest over using something else.

Almost like all that late XIX and early XX century spirit with Marx and worker movements, only from consumers, really weird.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Why? Because Windows is shit and Linux can’t run the software I need. Also, the Apple OSes are generally pretty nice to use, if you ignore the Apple shenanigans.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago (2 children)

ICQ... Now there's a name I haven't heard in a long time. I used to use the crap out of that service, but I can't for the life of me recall what killed it anymore than I can recall migrating from AIM.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Microsoft pushed msn messenger as a default in windows... Autostarted the app on login, made a million popups asking people to use it.. People stared using it. Usual story.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

They started breaking alternative clients intentionally with small protocol changes. Instead of just eating it everybody changed IMs, fast.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

like the other person said, modern windows is infinitely worse in just about every aspect of its design (you have to fight it if you just want to use your computer without microsoft 3rd wheeling it) and linux app support ranges from "ok" to "straight up doesn't exist and cannot be ran through any shenanigans"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Now, Apple customers who used Beeper’s apps are reporting that they’ve been banned from using iMessage on their Macs — a move Apple may have taken to disable Beeper’s apps from working properly, but ultimately penalizes its own customers for daring to try a non-Apple solution for accessing iMessage.

But the latter only found short-lived success, as Apple quickly figured out how to disable Beeper Mini from being able to reliably deliver messages.

The tech giant’s actions soon caught the attention of lawmakers, leading a bipartisan group of legislators to implore the U.S. Department of Justice to investigate Apple’s “potential anticompetitive treatment” of the Beeper Mini application.

Admitting up front that third-party software was to blame would sometimes result in the support rep being able to lift the ban, some noted.

As for Apple, it originally said Beeper techniques had “posed significant risks to user security and privacy, including the potential for metadata exposure and enabling unwanted messages, spam, and phishing attacks.”

Beeper put an end to its efforts to continue to develop an iMessage solution last month after releasing its latest software.


The original article contains 584 words, the summary contains 183 words. Saved 69%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

load more comments
view more: next ›