I assumed it was vandalism, not insurance fraud. I guess it's easier to get away with slashing tyres looking like a human than as a dubious bear.
Deebster
I thought we were finally agreeing fully! My understanding of the question is "what is the difference between a third (of a pizza, say) and a half?"
1/2 - 1/3 = 1/6
1/2 = 1/3 + 1/6
a half is one sixth more than a third.
btw, I fixed my Kagi screenshot since I'd missed a word from the question (reading comprehension's clearly not my strong point today)
Ah, you're right - I misunderstood jbrain's point to just be about the "relative to the original" understanding. Guess I'm no smarter than Google's AI.
The ExplainXKCD is great:
In truth, no such spoon is present on the probe, and Europa's icy crust is too thick to be penetrated by a spoon of such size.
The author is either being very tongue-in-cheek or very literal and humourless and I'm enjoying it both ways.
~~Yes, and the Google AI response is correct (and quite clear) in what it says.~~ edit: Thanks Batman. I mean that Google's understanding of the question is logical (although still the maths is wrong as you say (now I've re-read you)) and its answer explained the angle it was answering from.
However, I think the reasonable assumption for the intention behind the question is relative to a whole. I had third of a pizza, and now I have an extra sixth of a pizza. It's subtle, but that's the kind of thing AI falls down on.
If programming.dev is down, it's helpful to be able to see @[email protected] from other instances and check for planned downtime, etc.
Google's AI seems dumber than the rest, for example here's Kagi answering the same (using Claude):
edit: typoed question originally
Perhaps Google's tried to make it run too cheaply - Kagi's one doesn't run unless you ask for it, and as a paid product it'll have different priorities.
I'm more surprised that trapeziums aren't related to triangles.
I thought he'd cloned them when I was reading, but you're right, they're all different.
While I don't disagree, this article is pretty bad and unconvincing. Is it a draft or something dashed out to collect referral fees?
Vulnerable: VHD PTZ camera firmware < 6.3.40 used in PTZOptics, Multicam Systems SAS, and SMTAV Corporation devices based on Hisilicon Hi3516A V600 SoC V60, V61, and V63
It looks like they're using AI correctly: to identify patterns in huge amounts of data.
I think they'd struggle to mention their own name more often in that article.
I've been coding long enough that I still think of that as a fairly new thing in JS.