this post was submitted on 15 Jan 2024

66 points (95.8% liked)

News

23287 readers

4529 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.

2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.

3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.

4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.

5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.

6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.

7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.

8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.

9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.

10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

ESPN returns 37 Emmys, disciplines employees after a decades-long scheme is unearthed (www.yahoo.com)

submitted 10 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

7 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I'm not into sportsball, or the Emmys for that matter, so this has me very confused. Isn't this a scandal for the Emmys as much as it is for ESPN? If you're giving awards to people that don't even exist, you clearly aren't doing any due diligence to see if they deserve the award. And did the people getting these reengraved awards know that they didn't actually win? They weren't suspicious that there wasn't some official announcement from the Emmys? The Emmys wasn't weirded out by people that didn't win announcing that they did and showing off their trophy? How is any of this a thing?

top 7 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] [email protected] 59 points 10 months ago (1 children)

For anyone confused about the scheme, it seems fairly benign:

“College GameDay,” a cultural phenomenon and money maker for the network, scored eight Emmys for best weekly studio show from 2008 to 2018. The broadcast personalities were, until 2023, prohibited by NATAS guidelines from inclusion in a credit list for that specific category. They were eligible for other Emmys, such as host or studio analyst, but a win for the show wouldn't land any statuettes for on-air talent.

ESPN employees dodged the rule by including fabricated names listed as "associate producers" — who happened to have the same initials as on-air talent — and then scrubbing the statuettes of the fake names, per the Athletic. After having the talents' real names engraved on the trophies, the people involved gave them to ESPN's on-camera stars, who told the Athletic they had not known anything was sketchy.

The On-Air personalities were an important part of the show but were not going to get a trophy if the show won. Adding fake associate producers to the credits got an extra trophy to share with the people who contributed to their success.

Nobody cheated at the awards.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Why were they being excluded?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago

From the quote it sounds like this award was being designated to the show runners. There were other emmys for hosting/etc. that the hosts could have won.

I think it's fair for the emmys to designate who is eligible for the award, but I understand why ESPN would also want to recognize the hosts. Personally I think all these awards are mostly made up anyways, but I would say ESPN is more in the wrong as the emmys were specifically saying the hosts weren't doing anything worthy of an Emmy.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 10 months ago

Looks like they're just returning trophies not awards, so I'm guessing anytime a show wins an award everyone who happens to be on the show's crew at that time gets a trophy for it, and since there's a bit of turnover on those crews they probably just get a list of names from the studio and send out as many trophies as they get told they need, so it would probably be pretty easy to slip in a fake name or three and get some unique birthday gifts for people

[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I'm not clear on why on-air talent for a show wouldn't be eligible to be credited if the show won an Emmy.

Basically an executive at ESPN wanted the on air talent to get statuettes too, so he submitted fake names, had them re-engraved and gave them to them to the on air people.

Not much of a scandal.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

Yeah, if anything this reflects more poorly on the Emmys than on ESPN. ESPN was being good to the employees that contributed to its successes.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago

TIL There’s an Emmy’s category for ESPN shows.