You're always in space.
Ask Lemmy
A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions
Please don't post about US Politics.
Rules: (interactive)
1) Be nice and; have fun
Doxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them
2) All posts must end with a '?'
This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?
3) No spam
Please do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.
4) NSFW is okay, within reason
Just remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either [email protected] or [email protected].
NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].
5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions.
If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email [email protected]. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.
Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.
Partnered Communities:
Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu
Keanu Reeves woah
spun af atm
gluons be trying to keep me at home when I really wanna go out and smash
What are you on about?
Subatomic particle physics I’d rather not ruin the joke by explaining it yet
I'll have two of what this guy has.
Careful. At best, you're gonna get some armchair physicist poseurs responding to your question.
Yes pls
Nothing much, how about you?
The enemy gate is down, Ender!
Oohh this makes an excellent point!
I don't understand why people are downvoting this, but up, down, left, right all depend on your frame of reference.
Up in space is nowhere, but at the same time it is everywhere. Those are not physical concepts and they require necessarily a frame of reference to even make sense.
Ok. Frame of reference is half way between here and Andromeda!
That doesn't really tell me anything, haha
And I'm facing South.
Dude, North, South, East and West are not real either. Again, you need a frame of reference. Those are 100% arbitrary.
I can't tell if you're taking me seriously or not. 🤣
I am. "Halfway" is not a frame of reference. You need to arbitrarily define what up and down is. North and South is.
Why would it be arbitrary there? It's not arbitrary here.
I highly encourage you to Google this question. You don't seem to understand what a frame of reference is. At least not in this context.
The up quark or u quark (symbol: u) is the lightest of all quarks, a type of elementary particle, and a significant constituent of matter. It, along with the down quark, forms the neutrons (one up quark, two down quarks) and protons ...
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Up_quark
Nice! I didn't expect an answer I haven't even come close to pondering yet!
Down = where gravity is coming from, the most mass
Up = the opposite direction
What if I'm in a Lagrange point?
Opposition of aggregate primary gravity.
Ok, but what if I'm between galaxies?
Up is what you define as up in your coordinates.
So up is pretend?
No, up is what you define as up.
I define up as yo momma.
There are some hanging out on [email protected]
Hi there! Looks like you linked to a Lemmy community using a URL instead of its name, which doesn't work well for people on different instances. Try fixing it like this: [email protected]
Z axis
But that also has down.
The same direction it usually is relative to your perspective, assuming you're aligned to the galactic plane.
You need more context/specificity around your question. Right now, the question is like saying, "What is that thing...?"
But what is it?
May i present to you the cosmological principle
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmological_principle
the cosmological principle is the notion that the spatial distribution of matter in the universe is uniformly isotropic when viewed on a large enough scale
So in some sense, everywhere is up
I was thinking up is the direction of the expansion of the universe. Not sure if this supports that or not. Or maybe since we're drawn that way, it's the opposite?