Is there a one time payment option to remove ads?
Dev said he will ad a ad removal feature
this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2023
73 points (94.0% liked)
Sync for Lemmy
15130 readers
1 users here now
π
Welcome to Sync for Lemmy!
Welcome to the official Sync for Lemmy community.
The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:
Community Rules
1- No advertising or spam.
All types of advertising and spam are restricted in this community.
Community Credits
Artwork and community banner by: @[email protected]
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Honestly I would prefer to be able to buy a separate "Pro" version from the Play Store, without an in-app purchase. There have been issued in the past where in-app purchases didn't get recognized or when ads suddenly started appearing for people who bought the ad removal option.
He said that this won't happen because when developers publish "copies" of apps Google sees it as "abuse".
lj said he fixed that around a year ago.
That doesn't mean it won't ever happen again. I just have less trust in an IAP model. It's inherently more fragile because it does a license status check with Google every time you launch it, whereas a one time purchased app doesn't need to ask permission.
It does. I completely reworked it
Excellent to hear. This app is a no go until that option is available.
load more comments
(1 replies)
It will continue to be so weird for me to go from no ads to ads (or paying a subscription) just because you like the interface a bit more. All the free UIs already available seem perfectly usable and roughly equivalent in convenience.
Yeah, if subscription is the only way to remove ads then I'm fine with the Foss options like liftoff. And I'm blocking ads system wide on my phone, so it's not like I see any ads on Sync. But, I would still prefer to be able to pay to remove it, since I have moved away from using apps that have ads in favor of Foss or paying to for the ad free version over the years.
Yep, I had my credit card out (figuratively) and was ready to buy the ad free version, just to support the dev - but I turned right around when I saw the price (AUD$34).
I don't see ads either, it was literally just about the support for me. I'm weighing up whether to go back to Connect on principle, and if Adguard stops working on Sync, I'll definitely just walk away.
Yeah. I don't see a compelling reason to switch to Sync when there are so many other alternatives that are free and without ads. And then comes the subscription! Get outta here. I'm not even going to mention the data tracking. I'm sticking with my FOSS apps, thank you very much.
subscription fatigue is real.
I LOL'd at that phrase. So true. That being said, $17/yr feels pretty reasonable to me.
So far, I'm seeing placeholders for ads in my feed--but no actual ads. But I have multiple layers of adblocking set up at home, so...
$17/yr feels crazy expensive. After only a few years it's the price of a AAA video game which obviously has an order of magnitude more development put into it. The money wouldn't even be going towards Lemmy where the real costs are since they are the ones actually hosting it all...
$17 is almost 20% less than it will cost me to see OPPENHEIMER in 70mm IMAX. The former lasts a year, the latter 3 hours. Which will be more engaging? π€
Your point makes no sense. If we are going by amount of work per hour / price, if Oppenheimer costs 17$,then sync should cost like 2c...
How much of that ticket price went to the projectionist? I feel that would be the equivalent of Sync in this comparison since the actual hosting and creation of the content is elsewhere, Sync is just one person who shows it to you
Subscription models only make sense for an app/service that have recurring costs.
In the case of Lemmy apps, the instances are the ones with recurring hosting costs, not the apps.
If an app doesnβt have recurring hosting costs, it only makes sense to have one up front payment and then maybe in app purchases to pay for new features going forward.
Subscription models for an app thatβs not hosting anything is just the dev wanting a constant revenue stream, no matter how they try to word it.
Development is a recurring cost
I can't see ads (only a placeholder) due to my adblocker, but cannot purchase a subscription anyway (no play store)
Spoiler
Get the duckduckgo app and go to settings and enable the BETA feature to disable trackers from apps on your device.
You will see blank spots that say sponsored content but you will not see the actual ads. Good enough for me.
There's a $20 one time payment option.
Where is that?
When you tap the profile switcher in the upper left corner
Thank you!
The dev is working on one and it'll be released soon
Yes. But please update to the latest version. This option JUST got introduced.
There is now
While I really like the app, I still find the communities need to grow before I invest in it. So far it's been great. Just feels a little empty.
Maybe just launched with the beta, but on my menu on the left there's an option to remove ads
Where are they putting the ads? I haven't seen one yet and would prefer to not be hoodwinked.
In the feed. If you have a DNS adblocker they don't appear.
That explains it. I haven't seen any ads or even placeholders.
I've already seen some placeholders in my feed. Not sure yet if the ads aren't ready yet, or if my myriad adblockers are doing their jobs.
It sounds like there will be a one time purchase option (Sync Pro) but I haven't seen a timeline.
Personally, I'm doing the monthly subscription until Pro comes out. I appreciate that the dev got this beta up and running so quickly so I'm treating the subscription as a "thanks for your hard work." Like you, I'm overburdened with subscriptions, though, and can't maintain that long term.
With my pihole I don't see any ads. But would not mind paying a one time fee to remove them
view more: next βΊ