98
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

The tricky part is defining misinformation

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

...and "accurate information". Especially in today's world where every media outlet has bias.

[-] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

The ‘impossible’ part is defining misinformation. FTFY

Politics on forums like this where users decide what the truth is (upvotes, downvotes, front page, etc) will always be brigaded by shills and fans. And even worse, by authors of those truths. It’s a mouthpiece for the loudest out there.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Donald Trump lost the 2020 election and the Covid vaccine is safe and effective.

Funny, it's apparently not actually difficult to identify mis- and disinformation. People who tell you otherwise have an agenda.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

In a metatextual sense, you and I both know how hard it is to define though. But yeah misinformation that has a potentially harmful outcome to it needs to find as much resistance as possible and be quarantined

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Yes we need to do something about the viral sharing of straight up actual, demonstrable lies. The liars are the only ones who benefit from the rhetoric that lies are impossible to identify.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Everyone keeps talking about mis and dis information, while carefully neglecting to talk about the most important question: who defines what is and isn’t “good information”???? Anytime someone says it’s “the science” or what’s legal then you can be sure they have never read or even heard of history.

This last period will be taught in the future as the dark period of journalism, information sharing, and freedom in our current so called “democracy”.

[-] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

It'd probably only be applicable for a very few issues that would have wide consensus in the scientific community. The ones that come to mind are vaccines and global warming. But if you only go by very broad consensus items like that, it won't necessarily be very impactful overall. But thats probably good to not risk an incorrect assessment.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

"...but muh quarterly profits!!1"

-Meta

this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2023
98 points (98.0% liked)

Science Communication

873 readers
8 users here now

Welcome to c/SciComm @ Mander.xyz!

Science Communication



Notice Board

This is a work in progress, please don't mind the mess.



About

Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Be kind and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.


Resources

Outreach:

Networking:



Similar Communities


Sister Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Plants & Gardening

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Memes

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS