Science Communication

884 readers

1 users here now

Welcome to c/SciComm @ Mander.xyz!

Science Communication

Notice Board

This is a work in progress, please don't mind the mess.

2023-06-14: We are looking for mods. Send a dm to @[email protected] if interested!

About

Rules

Don't throw mud. Be kind and remember the human.
Keep it rooted (on topic).
No spam.

Resources

Media Bias Fact Checker

Outreach:

Skype a Scientist

Networking:

Academics on Mastodon

Similar Communities

Sister Communities

Science and Research

[email protected]

Biology and Life Sciences

Plants & Gardening

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Memes

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Social media can in fact be made better: Research shows it is possible to reward users for sharing accurate information instead of misinformation (theconversation.com)

submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

9 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Everyone keeps talking about mis and dis information, while carefully neglecting to talk about the most important question: who defines what is and isn’t “good information”???? Anytime someone says it’s “the science” or what’s legal then you can be sure they have never read or even heard of history.

This last period will be taught in the future as the dark period of journalism, information sharing, and freedom in our current so called “democracy”.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

It'd probably only be applicable for a very few issues that would have wide consensus in the scientific community. The ones that come to mind are vaccines and global warming. But if you only go by very broad consensus items like that, it won't necessarily be very impactful overall. But thats probably good to not risk an incorrect assessment.