this post was submitted on 10 Jan 2024
32 points (100.0% liked)

guns

2343 readers
1 users here now

“Under no pretext"

Rules (Under review):

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I don't really like glocks, got my eyes on a Sig P239 Enhanced Elite 9mm, but also kinda like the Berettas for not being a burgerland company, any other brands I should be looking at, whats the least chuddiest company, I looked at the HK site and my god, they have American flags everywhere and MAGA sales.

ETA: Im in 'Commiefornia' so any gun suggestions should be able to be sold here.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 34 points 10 months ago (1 children)

No ethical consumption under capitalism blah blah blah, but ESPECIALLY for guns. They are made for war and cops; civilian market is an afterthought. Buy used model of whatever fits your hand best. Maybe don't buy literally from Israel Weapon Industries, or buy through a leftist reseller if it really floats your boat, but I don't think you're gonna find much meaningful difference between the manufacturers.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

but I don't think you're gonna find much meaningful difference between the manufacturers.

actually American pistol brands/models tend to be terrible compared to European ones

[–] [email protected] 13 points 10 months ago

hey I'm rockin a $200 Taurus I'm not judging quality here

[–] [email protected] 27 points 10 months ago (2 children)

You should never buy a gun based on its chud status. It’s a tool and it’s here to serve a function. Plus that’s a battle I’ve tried to fight and got exhausted doing. Just buy the one you like, which after it’s all said and done, will probably be a Glock.

If after reading that you’re still not convinced, the only thing I’ll say is sig is easily the most chud of all of these at the moment because they won the NGSW contract for the army and also their pistols have been adopted by the army and marine corp.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Yeah. Can't really go wrong with a glock. they're as reliable as any mechanical device can be, there's tons of after-market parts and crap, everyone knows how to use them.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago

Yup it’s the biggest reason I recommend them. Everyone suggesting boutique guns is wrong imho. You will not find a pistol that is more ubiquitous that the Glock. There are tons of parts, you can always find videos about them if you have a question, and most importantly everyone uses them so magazines are plentiful.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 26 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

All gun manufacturers are MIC fascists. Get a gun that works for you. There aren't any guns with good politics.

For home defense skip the gun and get one of those giant 24oz canisters of pepper spray. You're much more likely to hurt yourself or someone else with a "home defense" gun than you ever are to stop a burglar. Pepper spray has a large number of advantages - You don't have to aim much, if you're wrong then someone is very upset at you and not dead, it's easy to use. Another big thing - Psychologically most people don't want to shoot an intruder. They want to scare them, tell them to leave, make them go away. Folks often don't shoot, which means now there's a loaded weapon in the situation that could be used against you, or whatever. You don't have to worry about that with pepper spray. If someone's in your house spray them down like it's a wet-t-shirt-contest of pain. No one's gonna die, or even really be injured, and while they might want to die now they'll be fine in a day or two.

Probably less legal bullshit to worry about, too, but I have no idea what self defense laws are in california. But generally speaking not killing people and not leaving permanent injuries is better, legally.

If you do want a gun, cali has a list of which guns you're allowed to own and afaik it's not a terribly long list, so you're going to have to start from there.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 10 months ago (1 children)

This is your brain on culture wars

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago

I hate it so much

[–] [email protected] 22 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Honestly, when it comes to guns, they're all fucking chud companies. They're all making money off of defense and/or cop contracts, and marketing themselves in the chuddiest way possible. Even imported AK's were sold by chud companies when those were still common. So long as it doesn't have explicit chud / fash symbols, that's about as good as you get when it comes to guns. I would concentrate more on your budget and needs.

Sig makes good guns. If you like those and it won't break the bank, they'll shoot forever as long as you maintain them.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 10 months ago (4 children)

Sigs quality has gone way down and I would think it’s mostly because they have the most current government contracts for their SPEAR rifle and their 320 style pistol. They don’t have to worry about regular customer services anymore really so I doubt this will change for the foreseeable future.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Ah, that makes sense. I haven't been in the market for a new gun in a while, so thanks. I'll probably go CZ in the future.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 10 months ago

First, you should probably get a very good idea of what you want by going to a shooting range and trying out different guns. You should also learn gun safety and how to shoot before buying a gun. A local lefty gun club is a good place to start to finding classes, hangouts, and places to buy locally. Re: supporting chuds, consider buying used, as this distances you from primary production.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Get a compact Glock, 9mm. Probably the g21.

Then get an optic.

Then replace the trigger.

I don't like my Glock. It is the most common handgun in America. You will find after market parts. You will be able to get magazines. You will be able to get carbines that receive Glock magazines. If you were to ever be in a shit hits the fan situation and you need to find ammo in an unexpected situation, 9mm/.556 is the most common round. You will be more likely to find like minded people who use this weapon and were you to be in a situation, you could share ammo/magazines.

I recommend handguns for home defense. Most encounters with firearms are less than ten yards which is within effective handgun range. They are far easier to conceal than an AR build. You won't be sticking your barrel around corners with a handgun. You can conceal carry a handgun and keep the element of surprise. They can be fired one handed.

So for your first gun, I (and others I know) recommend the Glock. That being said the people I know have a perspective on why we own firearms and our concern is very much a shit hits the fan anticipation in which case finding parts, magazines and ammunition is of chief concern to keep the gun functioning.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

Or get a good gun and avoid all those “upgrades” in the first place. The Glock patent has been public for decades now.

The CZ P-10 has everything Glock has to offer plus better triggers and sights out the box. But OP doesn’t like Glocks, so perhaps an M&P 2.0 which has a hinged trigger and a thumb safety (which is usually cheaper).

I say this a 2.0 owner: get the P-10C when it’s on sale. $290 + shipping + FFL transfer will probably be below $350 for an excellent gun. I’m on r/gundeals right now and and a Glock 21 Gen 5 is $620 + shipping + FFL. LMAO. And you gotta spend another couple hundred to get it to “perfection.” With the ~$300 you’d save with the CZ, you can buy 1000 rounds of ammo to practice with.

The only things Glock has to offer are wide usage by cops, soldiers, civilians, criminals which means:

  • more aftermarket parts
  • more parts in the wild
  • more “field reports” (I.e. how many people have been murdered by the state and how reliable was the gun when it was done)

Personally I don’t trust aftermarket internals for a defensive gun. Whatever the reasons, cops and soldiers aren’t usually permitted to modify their weapons so we don’t get to see the same reliability comparisons with OEM.

Having spare parts is nice, especially in a SHTF situation, but most of us aren’t in that situation so we shouldn’t be worried about scavenging for parts, especially for a newbie like OP.

Also, I trust CZ’s Glock clone to have the same reliability as the real Glock that’s been reported for decades. It might sound hypocritical to trust a clone of a gun over a clone of its parts, but CZ is a reputable company that has been making stuff for almost a century now. And again, the Glock patent is public and the P-10C doesn’t deviate too far from that whereas aftermarket parts do deviate from it.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I don't actually disagree with most of your analysis. A good gun is actually far better, imo, to having a generic shitty one. I hate my glock, I like my beretta much better, it fits better, the trigger is better, the iron sights are better etc. But my recommendation for a first gun is to get one that covers as many scenarios as possible while adequately serving the purpose of the user. And I bought my beretta first, I'm trying to give advice that I learned from not buying a glock first. As an example, I still cannot find standard magazines for my beretta px4 storm in a gun store (or at a gun show). I have to order them. So my recommendation for someone new is to not worry about being able to find parts/ammo/whatever for your first pistol.

People in vulnerable communities might be more concerned with SHTF situations. I'm not trying to dismiss your argument here. I'm trying to say that some people might think they may have to scavenge magazines from trucks with certain stickers on them in the very near future. I could give many examples. I don't think I have to, I've seen you posting.

I think if you're worried about using guns on a person, your first two should be a glock in 9mm and an AR in 556.

All this is my opinion but I do think its worth discussing. No animosity here.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Same here. I just dislike Glocks, not because it’s unreliable, but because it’s overpriced for what it offers. If they dropped the price down then I’d be recommending it to everyone as well

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago

This. Being able to throw a mag to your buddy is a greatly underestimated advantage of getting the most boring and common gun you can. I usually tell people AR - glock - any shotgun and after you've got those three start worrying about guns you like or whatever.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 10 months ago (2 children)

If you are looking for a firearm for home defense and are not conceal carrying it, you should buy a basic AR-15

Pistols take more training to shoot competently compared to rifles

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Everyone already said it, but you’re thinking about this wrong.

That said no matter what 9mm double stack striker fired pistol you get, set aside money to get a light, night sights or an optic that works good in the dark and possibly a suppressor (can’t rember if you can get nfa items in ca).

E: alternately if you know you’re not gonna practice, then get a light and night sights for your revolver.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 10 months ago (5 children)

Get an AR-15, it's a lot more fun for target shooting than a pistol. Go with featureless, too, because fixed magazine is a pain.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I like my CZ P10C. In general I think CZ is slept on in the us. It's a great shooting gun, at decent price. I ended up putting different sights (night sights) and a better trigger in it. But that was just personal preference and not a necessity.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago

The CZ is very slept on. The P-10 costs a third of a Glock and already comes with all the bells and whistles you have to spend hundreds on with a Glock. OP doesn’t like Glock, not sure why, but if it’s the trigger then they might not like the CZ.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

My favorite for home defense is my Smith and wesson M&P 9mm. Remember to use hollow points for home defense, much less like to penetrate walls than normal ammo. Also 9mm will stop someone (without body armor) just as well as .45 with less penetrative power, again something you want when ever you're in close quarters with non-coms

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

You should be able to find a cheap shotgun anywhere. 12 Guage is the real home defence situation. You should practice with it as well.

ak47 if you want to become a gun person there might be a socialist rifle associate somewhat near you.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Harder to find ever since they banned norinco. Days of cheap surplus ammo and AKs are long gone unless you live in Canada, where you can still get the Type 81 and Type 97, though that's looking short lived too.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 months ago

they banned norinco.

Can I get a fuck Clinton in the chat? It's okay when we sell rocket launchers to street gangs abroad, but when someone tries to sell rocket launchers to our gangs suddenly it's "Illegal arms trafficking" and "Fuck you america no 50$ shotguns or cheap ammo for you anymore".

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

To piggyback, if you were talking to a comrade who lives in a mid-sized midwestern city and has been thinking about getting a gun on and off for years, what would you say would be an affordable 'generalist' option that would be good to have if things went sideways? I have a toddler so I am very worried about safety, and have generally given up the thought on the grounds that, at the point where I have to defend against intruders I'm probably already fucked, even if being able to coordinate with other workers and perhaps hunt in an emergency are valuable capabilities.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 10 months ago (1 children)

For home defense - Pepper spray

For community defense - AR-15

for hunting - pretty much any cheap bolt action rifle with a half-decent scope on it.

You've got three different use cases that require different kinds of guns.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I thought people hunt with AR-15 because it's such a common platform?

Why do you suggest a bolt-action instead?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 months ago

Anybody who hunts with an ar-15 should be immediatly ignored.

It's the perfect gun if you want to trade the ability to take a well placed clean shot for the ability to take 6 shots that will ruin the meat around where it hits.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Bolt guns are really cheap. That's mostly it. You can hunt with an AR just fine. You choice of optics and accessories will probably be different. And a bolt-action rifle in a larger or spicier caliber than 5.56 is usually less expensive than getting a large caliber AR. You don't need a larger caliber for hunting, 5.56 works, but .308 or one of the countless other hunting rounds, afaik, is more likely to get a clean kill on the animal.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago (2 children)

for home defense you want a mossberg 500 shotgun my dude

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago (22 children)

Why do you think a pump action shotgun is ideal for home defense

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Compared to a handgun it is. You shoot someone with buckshot and they're likely to just drop. You shoot someone with a 9mm and they can carry on for a bit. You'd need multiple, better placed shots to equal one trigger pull of a shotgun.

Even a stronger handgun round has far less power than a basic long-barreled firearm. Ideally they'd get an AR-15 but the Calfornia thing probably fucks up the math with the lower magazine size.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I think long guns in home defense are worse than hand guns. The ability to conceal a handgun and not expose your profile/location with them when you have the advantage of knowing the home layout is superior. You can securely store handguns in much smaller spaces than long guns--you don't need a big gun safe. I'd also argue that someone getting hit with any round is probably going to stop what they're doing.

That being said, I've never defended my home with guns nor have I done entries into other people's homes. Maybe you're right.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago (3 children)

The ability to conceal a handgun and not expose your profile/location with them when you have the advantage of knowing the home layout is superior.

Why are you playing SWAT in a home invasion scenario instead of staying put? Plus, you vastly underestimate how much a handgun forces you to expose. You don't fire from the hip or with a limp wrist, you have to extend your arms to manage recoil. Doubly so if you have to fire 3-5 shots in quick succession. A shotgun may stick out a bit more when going around corners but in the fucking dark that's meaningless. Unless you're a guy who sticks his gun out from around the corner and waits.

PLUS, you can slip the shotgun stock under your shoulder blade and get LESS exposure than a handgun. You have to fire from the hip of course but that's workable with 8 balls of buckshot compared to a single bullet.

You can securely store handguns in much smaller spaces than long guns--you don't need a big gun safe.

You shouldn't keep your home defense firearm in a safe regardless. You don't want to be fucking with key when you have someone breaking in. Even if the safe is smaller, it shouldn't be locked up in the first place.

I'd also argue that someone getting hit with any round is probably going to stop what they're doing.

You can arguing this with yelling at the person too, or shining a flashlight in their eyes. There is percentage that will stop if you do anything. The fact is you don't want to be using a handgun when you find the percentage that'll fight back.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (6 children)

Very good advice, but I'd argue that an unsecured gun with unsecured bullets in the house is more of a threat to your safety than home intruders, statistically speaking.

Doubly so if you have kids or if kids are ever in your home for any reason.

Or, frankly, any adult without at least a firearm safety training program under their belt.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago

Yeah, guns in the home are a much, much, much greater risk to you and your family than home intruders. Live by the sword, die by the sword, yadda yadda.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

You shouldn't keep your home defense firearm in a safe regardless. You don't want to be fucking with key when you have someone breaking in. Even if the safe is smaller, it shouldn't be locked up in the first place.

This is another major advantage pepper spray has over a gun. If you actually want to defend yourself your gun should be easy to access and have loaded mags either in it or right next to it. That's really bad if you have kids in the house or whatever, or even if someone just breaks in and steals your gun.

Pepperspray? Paint it with glitter and leave it on the kitchen table. Who cares? If the kid gets it the worst thing that happens is a very, very, very upset kid for about two days.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 months ago

This is another major advantage pepper spray has over a gun.

I'd still say you should get a gun. Pepper Spray is great outside when you won't get splash-back and you can escape in any direction. Inside, you'll probably get some on you and the person you sprayed is now in an enclosed space with you. They may not be able to see you but they might still be able to flail around and injure you. Plus, most people work in groups when doing a break in. You may get one of them and then have to deal with 2 other guys without your spray. A firearm has multiple chances to stop the threat and is far more likely to cause others to gtfo.

Someone who would break into a home when people are there is a very different kind of thief and necessitates a hardliner approach.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (21 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›