this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2023
398 points (92.9% liked)

politics

19145 readers
4666 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 156 points 1 year ago (8 children)

Sweet Jesus the people in this country are fucking stupid.

The guy came a hallway short from ending democracy in our country and installing himself dictator and these stupid fucks want to give him another shot.

[–] [email protected] 48 points 1 year ago

To them, he came that close to success…

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago

Germany did that too. But the guy did a lot better in the first term and installed himself as the only Leader. He even got imprisoned, yet he prevailed.

Please Murica, just do the right thing. The oter option isn't great, but you'll regret another Trump 4ys

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

When Trump lost, they decided (and were propagandized into believing) that democracy had failed. Many of them genuinely believe that the democratic party is a fascist entity bent on destroying America. That's the scary part.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

I think there are about three things in play here:

  1. Quite a lot of the republican base lives in a completely different reality thanks to campaigns of propaganda and destroying education. Charitably, the best way to describe these people is extremely ignorant. For them, these indictments are dem led witch-hunts that they mostly don't believe, even when you can literally see the opposite. EG: Should presidents take classified documents? No. What are these pictures? those are classified documents at maralago. Did Trump do something wrong? Now let me tell you about Hunter Biden and the Biden crime family...
  2. Quite a lot of republicans are bordering on sociopathy if not pure evil. The party in particularly, and not the voters, know they're peddling bullshit but they don't care because it's going to get them more money/power, which is the only real goal/ideology. Then you have the white supremacists and fascists that are just evil and are doing this for ideological reasons.
  3. Systems are designed in this country to perpetuate this. Literal minority rule is a founding principal of this country.
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

Calling on my fellow Canadians to grab their shovels and dig a trench along the boarder so we can push off into the ocean and away from this clusterfuck.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 109 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Okay, before people start beating me up, I'm not arguing for complacency, but this headline is more than a bit click-baity.

This is a small poll, and per the poll's methodology (scroll down, keep scrolling.... nope keep going... ok... there you go - emphasis mine):

The New York Times/Siena College poll of 1,329 registered voters nationwide, including an oversample of 818 registered Republican voters, was conducted in English and Spanish on cellular and landline telephones from July 23-27, 2023. The margin of sampling error is plus or minus 3.67 percentage points for all registered voters and plus or minus 3.96 percentage points for the likely Republican primary electorate.

Not only did they over sample Republicans, their margin of error is almost 4% within that group.

This feels like the NYT attempting to establish a narrative based on a very small, biased sampling of data. Remember that the mass media wants to amp up the uncertainty levels (which drive engagement and advertising revenue), and with Trump basically blowing out the primary, they'll need another spectacle to ensure that it appears to be a close contest down to the finish line. The timing of the poll release and the headline is also suspect, especially as this poll was taken before the news of the latest indictment, yet presented as if it's a reaction to today's news.

That being said, I think it is an accurate portrayal of sentiment from those who still consider themselves Republicans. I don't believe, given the small sample sizes and admitted bias, that it's an accurate picture of the country.

Again, that's not an argument for political complacency - rather, it's one against media driven narratives relying on biased polling that make you scroll down six pages of tables to find their methodology.

[–] [email protected] 79 points 1 year ago (4 children)

It's also a telephone poll...that guarantees it's mostly people 50 and older because who the fuck under 50 answers phone calls from unknown numbers?

[–] [email protected] 54 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I rarely answer calls from known numbers

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I don't even answer calls from me.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's OK, I don't answer calls from you either.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Man, I actually answered a telephone pole a couple weeks ago. I was so excited to get his stupid poll while I was driving, and stuck in traffic. I figured I might as well sacrifice my 5 minutes (they claimed) to help get some more lefty numbers in their poll numbers.

Then it turned out it was a fucking poll for a natural gas company trying to greenwash their image and were looking for support for their anti-environmental ad campaign.

I was so bummed. Plus it took 45 minutes, fuck polls!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago

I was thinking about this after my first comment.

"Was it mostly land line polling?"

Boomers. Nothing but Boomers and their lead ravaged brains. You could probably run the electricity for the Eastern seaboard with the amount of spinning happening in the graves of their parents.

[–] [email protected] 69 points 1 year ago (14 children)

This can't be true,

Trump is a convicted rapist and known criminal that emboldened domestic terrorism.

Biden is actually doing a great job.

These two things are not equal.

[–] [email protected] 43 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I’m you from the future, people are really really really stupid.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They’re incredibly stupid in the present moment too. Stupidity is the great filter

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

....but, but, but Biden told those railroad workers to go back to work so the economy didn't collapse, so you know, he's just as bad as Trump!1!!

/s

I guarantee you that topic is going to come up more than a few times over the next few months from people who never intended to vote for Biden either way and instead are cherry picking bullshit topics to help sway others.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago (4 children)

And we have to be ready to counter with the fact that Biden continued to put pressure and ultimately got the rail workers their sick days.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] [email protected] 47 points 1 year ago (6 children)

All it takes is for Biden to develop a sudden health problem, as old people sometimes do; then it's Trump vs Kamala Harris and we're fucked.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Trump is only 3 years younger. They're both old as fuck.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That and Biden still jogs and bikes. Trump has a hard time shuffling down a ramp.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Similarly Trump could fall over dead tomorrow and then it's old man Biden vs young . This is the current plan for any Republican currently in the race, the hope that Trump takes himself out, either via the legal system or just poor general health, and then they can swoop in and be Trump "lite".

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Trump could fall over dead and his cult of followers would still vote for him.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

As long as the same two parties rule the country in a cycle you will always be fucked

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago (17 children)

There are different levels of fucked though.

load more comments (17 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (8 children)

If anything this should scare the Democrats. Imagine if the Republicans nominated someone even slightly decent?

I said it after 2020 with all the trouble he had getting elected, Biden probably should be a 1 term president and not run for re-election.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Someone who is even slightly decent doesn't have what it takes to get the Republican nomination.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I originally said "not Trump" And probably should stick with that. Basically that election was a 4 year referendum on Trump. That energized a lot of the Democrat base, and got the vote out. And Biden still struggled, when he probably should have destroyed him.

It honestly feels like both parties are choosing the weakest candidates over the last eight years.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Agree.

We need serious political reform before that is likely to change. A country of 300+ million people with only 2 parties, and a choice between 2 weak old men. It is deeply depressing.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Republicans can’t, though. I mean Trump started a literal insurrection on Jan 6 to try and overturn the last election. Do you really think he’ll just bow out gracefully if he somehow looses the primary?

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It makes me crazy that we're even talking about this and it's more than a year away. Our election cycles in the US are too damn long.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago

This is what happens when political parties are treated and viewed like sports teams

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 year ago (6 children)

The USA votes it’s president in with the Electoral College. Every poll talking about “voters … tie … blah …blah …blah” doesn’t mean shit, cause the voters don’t get to pick the president. Their representatives do. And guess what, their representatives don’t have to represent them. They can vote however they want. They can even get elected and then switch parties to the bad guys team. Also, fuck the GOP.

clickbait

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Is this another landline poll? Those are notoriously and increasingly useless.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You mean you don't take 15 minutes out of your day to answer random questions when a random phone number calls?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

At this point I hope for pollsters to contact me just so I can see how the process works.

I think I got texted once about the 2020 election and that was it. People who don’t have landlines are invisible when it comes to polls like this.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The New York Times/Siena College poll of 1,329 registered voters nationwide, including an oversample of 818 registered Republican voters, was conducted in English and Spanish on cellular and landline telephones from July 23-27, 2023. The margin of sampling error is plus or minus 3.67 percentage points for all registered voters and plus or minus 3.96 percentage points for the likely Republican primary electorate

Landline and cellular plus an oversample of republicans? Maybe someone better at statistics can say why that was needed

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago

Propaganda works great, doesn't it?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

These numbers never really matter.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

This should not even be possible. The propaganda machine in place since Nixon apparently works. People are fucking stupid.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

With such a small sample all you can really take from this is that both parties will receive votes. This says next to nothing about how close the race will be.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

None of this matters. I mean the DNC could run some octogenarian and Dem voters would happily vote for him/her. The RNC could run some octogenarian who was twice impeached and thrice indicted and the Republican voters would happily vote for him. It's crazy town.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›