78
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Pennsylvania judge ruled that former President Trump is immune from a lawsuit filed by an election worker over Trump's false claims of election fraud while in office. The judge said Trump's comments sowing doubt about the 2020 election results were made while he was president and therefore covered by presidential immunity. However, the lawsuit also cites a letter Trump wrote after leaving office which is not covered by immunity. While the judge dismissed the claims regarding Trump's statements made while president, other legal proceedings may still examine the appropriateness of those statements.

top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] [email protected] 76 points 1 year ago

Fuck that. Presidential immunity is for the executive office of the united states to be able to bend some rules to act in the best interest of the people represented by the office. There is no way to describe undermining the constitution to subvert the best interests of the people represented by the office as being in their best interest.

[-] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago

So the president can just do whatever they want with no consequences at all?

[-] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago

For real what happened to nobody being above the law

[-] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago

Not surprising, actually. Courts don't seem to want to resolve the question of "Presidential immunity", even though it is not explicitly written into the Constitution (where other functions are). So now it has become "tradition", until, that is, a judge grows a pair and works to clarify the situation.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

Depending on the timeline, it isn’t unreasonable to expect an amended complaint based on allegations in the indictment that was released by Jack Smith yesterday.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Other legal proceedings may examine the propriety of his statements and actions while he was the President and whether, as the plaintiffs in this and other cases contend, it was this conduct which served as the actual threat to our democracy. But this case is not the proper place to do so. Here, Trump is entitled to Presidential immunity.

It sounds like he is handing off the presidential immunity decision to a higher court. Can somebody with a legal background say whether this kind of case can go to a higher court?

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

🤦‍♂️

[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

That all read as, it's just an opinion man.

this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2023
78 points (100.0% liked)

Politics

10168 readers
12 users here now

In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS