this post was submitted on 07 Jan 2024
426 points (93.8% liked)

News

23305 readers
3693 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 134 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Oh, he meant the previous civil war.

[–] [email protected] 82 points 10 months ago (1 children)

And hes blaming the Feds for it.

The south wanted to force the North to treat escaped slaves as stolen property.

The North said they were people.

So the south tried to force the feds into helping them.

The feds told the south "state rights, the Fed can't do that".

So the South started a civil war against the federal government, in an attempt to get a more powerful federal government.

Which actually did work? The federal government went ahead and banned slavery outright during the war. Something Lincoln had spent years saying the federal government couldn't do.

So by trumps logic:

When conservatives try to do something, we should just do the opposite because if they fight a civil war over it, that's what'll happen anyways

[–] [email protected] 42 points 10 months ago

The feds told the south “state rights, the Fed can’t do that”.

It's worse. The Feds told the South "Okay, we'll make it law." And that still wasn't enough for the South.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 72 points 10 months ago (13 children)

Go on... how would you have negotiated the South out of slavery?

[–] [email protected] 91 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Are you sure that's what he would be negotiating for?

[–] [email protected] 43 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Probably the opposite, but I think he is honestly trying to suggest that the South could have been negotiated out of chattel slavery. He's a moron, let's not forget that.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 10 months ago

And a racist, let's not forget that.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 10 months ago (1 children)

$100 says he doesn't know what chattel slavery means.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 29 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

This orange asshole is completely surrounded by White Nationalists, Neo Nazis, KKK Members, Confederate Apologists, etc. etc. They all sit around spewing this shite to each other and then he plays their greatest hits on stage to the Qult45 crowds.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Before the war, Lincoln wasn't an abolitionist. He wanted to stop new states from having slavery, and keep no slavery where it was. He was fine with letting the south keep their slaves for the sake of the Union.

The problem was the South did not want to limit their potential to grow slavery to new states, and decided to go to war over it.

Still doubt negotiation could have worked. Lincoln really did not want to go to war in the first place.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I judge people more by their deeds than their desires, especially their desires before the fact. Lincoln ended up doing the right thing. He also ended up successfully seeing the country through one of the most difficult times, if not the most difficult time, in its history. He is, to me, rightfully regarded as one of our greatest presidents regardless of his thoughts on slavery before the war.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 10 months ago

The problem was the South did not want to limit their potential to grow slavery to new states, and decided to go to war over it.

This shows exactly why Trump is wrong.

The reason they didn't want new states to all be free states is that then Congress would have the votes to make slavery illegal.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] [email protected] 58 points 10 months ago (2 children)

They'll sacrifice their lives for a person who is demonstrably the actual biggest loser in history, and he just gets more loser-y, folks, okay... If any of you are starting to have your memories fade, here's a quick refresher to read this morning and then copy and send to your aunt karen in Missouri.

  • 0 re-elections won
  • 1 term president
  • 2 times impeached
  • 3 marriages
  • 4 inch lifts in his shoes
  • 5 kids, from 3 different mothers
  • 6 bankruptcies
  • 7 US Capitol police suing him for Jan 6 terrorist insurrection and murder of police
  • 8 trillion + dollars added to the US debt in a single term
  • 9 trump lawyers sanctioned by federal judge for lying in frivolous election fraud lawsuits and ordered to pay defendant's legal fees
  • 10 years that trump paid $0 in income taxes between 2000 and 2015. ($0 to cops, teachers, roads, prisons, disaster relief, etc)
  • 11 trump associates charged with serious crimes over the past 5 years
  • 12 million votes (the big lie) - trump claims he won the 2020 election by 12 million votes when in reality, he lost by about 7 million votes.
  • 13 of August, 2021 - one of multiple days that trump was supposed to magically become president again according to Qanon and a crack addicted pillow salesman (the two most respected information sources in the gop)
  • 14 year old girl in a youth choir that trump approached in 1992 to say, "Wow! Just think - in a couple years I'll be dating you."
  • 15 originally confirmed cases of COVID in the US trump said would soon be, “down to close to zero.” followed by, “like a miracle, it will disappear.” - over 1,000,000 Americans have since died of COVID and it continues to kill 4 years later.
  • 16 years old - age of daughter ivanka when she hosted "miss teen" pageant and, according to long time trump associate Noel Casler, "trump called her over in the middle of a rehearsal and had her give him a lap dance while he leered at the crew."
  • 17 known trump and russia investigations from local, state and federal prosecutors
  • 18 gop senators that ignored trump threats / warnings and supported Biden admin's infrastructure bill.
  • 19 as in COVID19 - trump was verified as the single largest source of disinformation on the virus, with a Cornell study claiming that 38% of the "misinformation conversation" originated with trump
  • 20 the day in January, 2021, when Biden was sworn in despite trump inciting a violent insurrection to stop election verification at the US Capitol.
  • 21 gun salute that trump ordered for himself when he left office after a humiliating defeat, even though he never served in the military, famously called military members "losers" and "suckers" and actively avoided the draft with a cowardly "bone spurs" excuse.
  • 22 date in August, 2021, when Alabama hate rally crowd booed trump for finally saying people should get vaccinated, only after 700,000 Americans have died due mostly to his failure as president
  • 23 as in wrestlemania 23 in 2007 where trump, a cartoon level failure with no other prospects, participated in a fake bet that a proxy wrestler would win a fake fight on his behalf or he would shave his wig and hair plugs off.
  • 24 day in August, 2021, when trump actually filed a lawsuit in Florida court against YouTube, a private company, demanding that they reinstate his YouTube channel like a desperate, irrelevant embarrassment with no platforms left to abuse.
  • 25 plus credible sexual assault allegations against trump, spanning decades and with accusers starting as young as 13 years old at time of assault.
[–] [email protected] 24 points 10 months ago

And a partridge in a pear tree.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 50 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

At a campaign event in Iowa today, former President Donald Trump explained that the Civil War didn't have to happen. "So many mistakes were made," Trump said. "I think you could have negotiated that."

"This is something that could've been negotiated," he added. "…That was a tough one for our country…. Abraham Lincoln? If you negotiated it, you probably wouldn't even know who Abraham Lincoln was… That would've been okay…. I know it very well… I know the whole process that they went though. They just couldn't get along."

They couldn’t get along,..because one side wanted to keep all their slaves.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 46 points 10 months ago (4 children)

So I wonder what degree of slavery we'd have ended up with? A little? Almost as much? 50% slavery?

What a fucking idiot.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 10 months ago (8 children)

Slavery is already legal in US if you arrest a person first. That is an exception of the 13th amendment,

I assume that is why US has the biggest prison population in the World and is 6th country in the World by per capita incarceration rate (first western country). If China and India would incarcerate it's citizens as much as US, China would have 4 times and India 10 times it's current prison population. And of course white people are about 8 times less likely to be incarcerated then black people.

"Land of the free"

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 10 months ago (4 children)

The funny thing is that Lincoln pretty much said they could keep their slaves for the sake of keeping the union together. He had made it clear he wanted to abolish slavery, but he wasn't going to risk the nation over it. He basically opened with an offer to let the south have everything.

The South, however, believed that the day would come where the US would abolish slavery, and they needed to get out before that happened.

Given the South were handed everything they wanted in the default position, no amount of negotiation would have worked.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Fucking secessionists already attacked Ft. Sumter before abolishing slavery was even a big issue, they just were stupid drunk on power and thought they had a righteous cause. I have a gaming mouse that has been in use longer than the confederacy existed.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 42 points 10 months ago

That's pretty much what Lincoln tried to do with his inaugural speech after several states had seceded already. He tried to talk them down and promised that the North would not interfere with their life heavy-handedly but that insurrection was too serious for him to ignore. And then they stormed Fort Sumter and forced his hand. He didn't even commit to the cause of abolishing slavery until the third year of the war.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I mean technically yes, the South could have negotiated a surrender any time they wanted.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 months ago

I wish Lemmy had a way to high-five people.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (9 children)

It's frustrating that historically lost causes based on hatred, like the slavers of the Confederacy or any form of fascism, are never fully punished for what they do. Each time a war ends the history writers make thousands of exceptions for people who were clearly working for their own self interest at the cost of society.

Any time a right wing, conservative cause loses (which is all the time based on history) they need to be burned bad: take away their money and livelihoods and make them reliant on social services.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] [email protected] 36 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

I can't wait to read this fascist waste of oxygen's obituary.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 36 points 10 months ago

This idiot also wanted to cure your COVID infected body with bleach injections and UV light

[–] [email protected] 35 points 10 months ago (5 children)

Surprised he's not calling it the "War of Northern Aggression" just to really try to suck off his base.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 33 points 10 months ago (2 children)

It's never good to negotiate with fascists.

You hear that, Democrats?

[–] [email protected] 15 points 10 months ago (1 children)

They never hear that. It's always about "bipartisanship." And these are who we're stuck voting for to stop the Republican agenda. Fucking hell.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The other thing I hear from status quo warriors is "We want things back to normal."

No, we fucking don't! Normal sucks donkey ass for a lot of people.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

And they don't want to put things back to normal anyway. They always want whatever the status quo is maintained.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I love the photo they used. Saving that for future memes.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Looks like he might be in the middle of filling his diaper. My kid used to make the same face.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 10 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Negotiate? He's suggesting things would've gone better if we'd agreed to mostly keep slavery but soften it a little in exchange for concessions? Well, that's horrifying.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (10 children)

That precise negotiation is how we got the civil war, as well as a number of other completely busted, antidemocratic US institutions like the Senate. Making compromises with slavers.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 10 months ago

Maybe my vote could have been 2/3 of a white vote? And we could negotiate with women. Maybe they could just tell us who to vote for but not actually do any voting and we could then have a family vote?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 10 months ago

Translation: I am going to negotiate a new civil war

[–] [email protected] 12 points 10 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

This is one that I deal with all the time with the extreme right, the extreme left, the extreme LGBTQ..., the extreme vegans etc.

You have to negotiate!

No, we don't. Some starting positions are so ridiculous that they leave no room for negotiation. No one is owed a negotiation. Sometimes the answer is, "No."

EDIT: A couple of pedantic extremist apologists and a small brigade of their friends tried to shout and insult me down. They failed. They weren't interested in a conversation, just silencing someone whose message they didn't like. Do you know how I know this? Not a single one of them asked me to explain myself. Not a single one asked me why am extremist is an extremist.

All extremists have a pathological belief that they are somehow superior and that that superiority justified their anti-social behavior. So neo-Nazi extremists have a pathological belief that they are racially superior and that that superiority justifies harassing, intimidating, and threatening people they believe are racially inferior to leave. Vegan extremist believe that they are morally superior and that that moral superiority justifies their harassing, intimidating, and bullying restaurateurs butchers, grocers, farmers, and their customers to change their diets to comply with the extremists beliefs.

So, the (pedantic) details may be different but the underlying pathology is the same.

An extremist is an extremist. They're all pathological assholes with grandiose delusions.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 10 months ago (14 children)

Some of those are not the same

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 10 months ago

Just like he negotiated with those people on January 6th.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

He’s propping himself up to be a victim of the next one.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Technically, he is right in "The Civil War" being avoided BUT it would have just deferred conflict in the long run. There was no way the US would have continued with slavery. Absolutely zero chance due to an economic perspective.

The federal government would have 100% stroked a deal where select southern states could have kept slavery but the other states and especially the newest states would not be able have slavery. Not being able to negotiate this is what actually led to civil war. The confederates did not want to negotiate.

The North is industrial and made products to sell and export. The south used slavery for agriculture. If the slavery states would use that free labor to go industrial it would be a DISASTER for the slave free sates. Conflict would then arise to make sure the south no longer has that "economic advantage" over the north.

tldr: Any market with legal slavery will go "capitalism full bloom" and create a market where free Americans have no chance to compete.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 months ago

Fits completely in line with his intentions to appease Putin.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago

Just another attention grabbing word salad to entertain his mindless cult zombies.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Oh boy! 1939 all over again!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›