this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2023
19 points (91.3% liked)

politics

19136 readers
4069 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I support eliminating billionaires.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I’m not having kids because billionaires have bribed, lobbied, and misinformed this country, and by extension the world, to the brink of ruin

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Why report on that guy's opinions as if they matter? He's rich, not a voting rights expert.

He's a fascist, too, which people conveniently ignore because he's rich and some of it might rub off on them.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

For the same reason the opinion of someone like Rupert Murdoch matters. Its not about their viewpoint directly as an individual, its the fact they control massive platforms that can and do sway public opinions.

In murdochs case he's had an influential impact on British politics over the last 40 years and has used his media empire to act as a king maker.

Musk isn't as savvy or as intelligent as Murdoch but that doesn't mean is influential position should be ignored.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

why republicans always find a way to deny voting for some random group?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Welcome to the rise of aggressively pro-natalism billionaires, because it's 2023 and we're not imploding fast enough.

Remember, you won't have a seat on the transport to Mars. And if you ever get there, it will be to work the mines.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I feel like these people are using the Handmaids Tale as a guide at this point...

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I disagree with his fundamental premise that people with children can see the interests of society better.

I don't have children, but I have heard from every possible source that once you have children they become your world.

How is a person expected to reason clearly about the interest of millions of people when they are running an ancient biological program focused on the interests of a tiny family unit?

edit: I once saw the argument that having family doens't make you a better person. Having family makes you a ruthless user and taker on behalf of your family. Most of the stories you hear of people giving in to corruption, happen because those people can't afford to lose their jobs, because they have mouths to feed. Once you have kids, you must choose whether you value your kids over your civic responsibility, or vice-versa.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

People with children won't have the time to research issues too deeply, and they will be sleep deprived for several years.

They make better sheep.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

To think that not so long ago, this authoritarian, grifting man-child was hailed as the real-life Tony Stark. If the mask slips any further, even his remaining fanboys are going to find it difficult to defend him.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Ah yes, “I don’t want to say gay and intersex people shouldn’t be allowed to vote, but I do want it to happen.”

Anyways I’m sterile and drive the most fuel efficient vehicle practical, don’t eat meat, and have made other sacrifices for future generations to have a habitable planet. Musky here has a private jet and at least one of his kids hates him

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

People forget a huge side of this as well. It's not just being financial able to have kids but physically able. More and more people now days are seeking fertility treatment and having fertility issues. According to elon, those people would not have the right to vote.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What happened to free speech absolutist

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

What happened to free speech absolutist

It turns out he's a disingenuous shit-bag. But you didn't need me to tell you that.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Point would be that if you have kids you have skin in the game and would make more responsible choices with your vote. Same has been said about military service, which also makes a lot of sense. Not practically, of course, but the point highlights the fact that we could have people who are unqualified to make decisions, even if its electing officials, making decisions that impact everyone, including and maybe more importantly, the generations to come.

In a true democracy there is no mechanism for qualifiying or handling quality control for the voting population, and so for elected officials and their policies. This is why we are a democratic republic, and Elon is just saying if you're going to be involved in electing officials you should have skin in the game.

We already have requirements to voting and if you think about it, they are in the same spirit.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I support eating the rich; one bite at a time.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

In french a bite is a.., well this sentence is funny to me.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

what in the starship-troopers-ass fuck is this troll shit

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (17 children)

Talk about unalienable rights to life and liberty

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How about we stop caring what that clown has to say?

I find it especially egregious the people who (rightfully) bash him, but continue to support his products such as Twitter and Tesla. Stop supporting him. Especially on Twitter. Advertisers have fled the platform. Some users have as well. If even 1/2 the people who claim to hate the guy just stopped using Twitter, the entire platform would collapse. Instead you people prop up that site by going to it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

People whine about how shitty the API has become and how shitty tech support is and how there's no one to talk to when they run into bugs - yet they keep paying Musk $42,000 a month for that privilege.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Is this guy literally having a psychosis?

His actions lately (I say lately, loosely) have been absolutely batshit bonkers.

I'm enjoying the show none the less

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

FrEe SpEeCh

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It’s amazing he’s had sex 10 times. I don’t get what’s attractive about him in any form.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why do republicans hate freedom so much?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I support 100% tax over $1 billion. If you can't manage on a billion dollars, the rest would be better spent on others, anyway.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (22 children)

I've heard people make this kind of argument before: 'People with children are actively invested in the future of the nation. People without children are on a 100year free-trial.'

Its not unthinkable, tbh.

load more comments (22 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›