watch -n 1 date
this post was submitted on 01 Jan 2024
163 points (88.3% liked)
linuxmemes
21169 readers
863 users here now
Hint: :q!
Sister communities:
- LemmyMemes: Memes
- LemmyShitpost: Anything and everything goes.
- RISA: Star Trek memes and shitposts
Community rules (click to expand)
1. Follow the site-wide rules
- Instance-wide TOS: https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/
- Lemmy code of conduct: https://join-lemmy.org/docs/code_of_conduct.html
2. Be civil
- Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
- Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
- Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
- Bigotry will not be tolerated.
- These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
3. Post Linux-related content
- Including Unix and BSD.
- Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of
sudoin Windows. - No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
4. No recent reposts
- Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.
Please report posts and comments that break these rules!
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
I was going to post exactly that, lol
nice
No, that's a specific number.
what
69 -> nice.
I referenced an overused, childish joke.
Same
what does it do?
it runs the date command once per second until you hit ctrl+c
tysm!
-d if you're feeling sporty.
If we're adding dramatic flourish, I'll suggest watch -n 1 'date | cowsay'
tysm
Slightly unrelated but cygwin will run better on windows (its way lighter)
Better in which way? WSL2 is a VM running ALONGSIDE Windows, not inside. Its performance is basically bare metal. If you have enough RAM, there is no reason to use cygwin instead of WSL2.
its complicated please dont blame me for WSL
In that case why don't you just run a VM or install bare metal. WSL strips you of control just like Windows itself does.
its complicated as i replied to someone else's comment...
im not a "it just works" user too but its complicated to explain why i use windows for now (but ill switich soon)
like im totally a FOSS enthusiast but like...
AHHHH "Has ptsd flashbacks from having to use Cygwin on a mixed build environment for a popular MMO that's about some kind of war up in the stars.." lol NOT THE CYGDRIVE lol jk but it did take me back ~5 years.
i try to understand that...
Yep, that's what I use as well... in Windows I mean.
Can Cygwin run Linux GUI programs effectively? What about GPU-bound workloads? Would happily switch if the answer to both of those is yes.
You can run GUI apps but I'm not sure about GPU workloads. Wouldn't bare metal be the best for that?
Wouldn't bare metal be the best for that?
Technically yes, but WSL2 is remarkably close to optimal in terms of throughput. Unlike WSL1 (a type 2 hypervisor), WSL2 requires Hyper-V (a type 1 hypervisor), meaning Windows also runs as a VM once it’s enabled. The Linux vGPU driver still needs to go through the Windows Nvidia driver as far as I know, but that is seldom the bottleneck for CUDA applications.
true it uses a Microsoft Hypervisor Virtual Machine
i dont mind the GUI... but is Cygwin open source? just knowing
Best option is still Git Bash 🙃
most true :3
thanks
while :; do date; sleep 1; done
watch -n1 date
none
thanks this is more like c syntax tho its bash im learning c btw :3
it's posix shell, also it produces an output similar to your post unlike watch, which everyone is rushing to point out as if it were the ultimate superninja haxxor secret tool that nobody knows about :DDD
what