this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2023
160 points (97.6% liked)

News

23282 readers
3833 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Dog meat consumption, a centuries-old practice on the Korean Peninsula, isn't explicitly prohibited or legalized in South Korea

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 60 points 1 year ago (10 children)

Why does eating dog meat bother meat eaters? What's the difference between one animal and another?

[–] [email protected] 41 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The argument would be how intelligent the farmed creature is. People have a great connection with dogs due to the dog's intelligence.

Problem is cows and pigs are also very intelligent. The only reason people are so comfortable eating them is they aren't pets in a home for 99% of people. Out of sight, out of mind. So people feel it's absurd to eat dog, because they can look up from their screen and see a dog happy for their attention, practically family.

I Guarantee if people were around a pig or a cow as a pet as often or regularly as dogs, we wouldn't eat them.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

I agree. This is partly why I gave up eating meat, I saw videos of cows sleeping in someone's lap.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You would think, but my wife's cousin's family had a pet pig and they come to family gatherings with pork-based dishes (not made from the pet).

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

I mean if pig universally meant pet. Like, across society

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 year ago

In order to better live with the fundamental contradiction of loving animals but also eating them, people put some animals in the “pet” box and some in the “meat source” one with a one way street between the two, in that animals that would be considered meat sources can become pets but never the other way around.

I bet it subconsciously makes some people feel more compassionate towards animals. But it's nothing more than a moral contradiction trying to be masked.

It makes sense to feel some sense of apprehension or even disgust when the topic of eating dogs is brought up because it feels so geographically and culturally distant from us, but the truth is you can see this happen across the relatively small European continent. Dog meat used to be a thing in Switzerland, maybe not anymore. Nordics will be horrified to learn cute bunnies are a very culturally relevant meat source down south in the Mediterranean (traditional paella contains both rabbit and chicken meat), where they are also kept as pets. France loves their horse meat but in other places of Europe this is unheard of. And so on.

Don't get me wrong, I eat meat and have a couple of cats as housemates. You couldn't pay me enough money to try cat meat. But I don't pretend like it isn't a fundamental contradiction, nor will you see me retching if I hear eating cats is a thing in some region/culture.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I think the particular issue with the dog meat industry is that it has high amounts of cruelty, even by meat industry standards. Iirc there's the belief involved that if the dog suffers it makes the meat taste better. So at many farms they are often tortured before death and killed in painful ways. They are also kept in horrendous conditions. Farm animals are often kept in horrendous conditions as well, but generally that's because of a lack of regulation and most people who oppose dog meat farms also oppose the mistreatment of farm animals as well.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Iirc there's the belief involved that if the dog suffers it makes the meat taste better. So at many farms they are often tortured before death and killed in painful ways.

Do you have any sources on this? Not doubting you, I'm just genuinely curious.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They do it to cows as well. Veal.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I was in S. Korea with the U.S. Army Reserve back in '00 and one of the last nights we were there, we went off base to this local restaurant that was basically some Korean family's living room and they cooked food in their private kitchen. We ordered one of everything, and one of the dishes was dog (gaegogi), which had already been slaughtered, so it wasn't like we ordered it and they had to kill it for us. Does that make it any more moral or humane on our part? No, not at all. But it was a cultural dish, and we were there for the cultural experience. I remember hearing the same as you though, that there was some cultural belief that if the dog suffered before it died, the meat tasted better (something about the adrenaline running through it's muscles or something like that, I dunno), so they would tie the dog up by its hide legs and sear the fur off it with a blow torch while it was still alive. That's what we heard, anyway. Was it true? I dunno.

While I of course don't agree with the inhumane treatment, if their culture is to eat dog, then it is. We eat beef in the U.S. and that's horrific to Hindus, who believe cows are sacred. We don't exactly treat beef cattle very well before we slaughter them either, for that matter. I think where eating meat is concerned, you're either all-in or all-out. You can't bash one culture for their cuisine and not take a deep look at your own as well and realize that they are all fucked up in their own way.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

This is a very good point.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It bothers us because we know that dogs are relatively intelligent, often kind, feel pain and get sad. In many ways they act like children. We know this because many of us have pets or know people who have dogs as pets. Same thing for horses, to a lesser degree. This makes it harder to lie to yourself or ignore their suffering, and makes us feel bad about eating meat and the suffering that inevitably entails. If pigs, who are surprisingly intelligent, were common household pets, we'd feel bad about that too. But they aren't, so we get to pretend that they're stupid and don't die in pain and in fear.

In many ways, it's not much different to how most of us decide to pretend that child labour or slavery no longer exist, despite regular revelations about the suffering our consumerist purchasing decisions perpetuate. Or how we're happy to buy unnecessary nonsense, replacing perfectly good clothes, replace a functional phone with the newest shiny thing, spend money on content that we could easily do without, rather than donate to a charity that could have prevented children and innocents dying needlessly. We know deep down that we're choosing to let people die, we pretend we don't so we can buy some more luxuries.

People are often evil. This is the baseline of human behaviour. We like to convince ourselves we're not, by occasional acts of goodness.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Pigs are absolutely excellent companion animals in the same way, it's well documented. My farmer friend has one for years and he was delightful. She had chickens who had wonderful funny personalities. There's videos of cows playing with children and sleeping in their laps.

The logic just doesn't make any sense. I see what you are saying, don't get me wrong, but I just don't get how people can "rescue" dogs and yet talk about how much they love bacon.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Social expectations. I raised a few pigs in 4H and while they were as smart as dogs, they were raised to be eaten and after being sad about my first one, the established idea that they exist to be eaten made it different than a dog who existed to protect the animals from wild predators. Heck, outside farm dogs and cats also have a different relationship than indoor dogs and cats becsuse of how everyone treated then when I was growing up.

So while I known in my mind that dogs raised to be eaten are seen in some places like pigs are here, it is just established as a different thing socially. Kind of like how many people are averse to eating squirrels and rabbits because they see them as small animals that hang out in their yards, not a food source.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The logic absolutely makes sense. One is more familiar to an average person and other is less. It's not that hard to grasp lol.

Doesn't make it any less of a double standard. Same with squids which apparently are relatively intelligent and we still eat them but for some reason dolphins are a no-go (are they endangered? Idk.).

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

True. While I don't think humanity doesn't have to avoid consuming animal products as a whole it would be great if alternative protein sources were cheaply available (and ideally subsidized) so that cheap meat products become unappealing.
Simultaneously we should have a higher standard of treatment for animals and beef in particular should be much less available because of its extensive influence on the climate.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (17 children)

Really none of it is safe. When you think about how COVID is a zoonotic infection that jumped species, breeding animals for food and the conditions they are kept in, full of feces and infections, it's not really a surprise.

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Different trophic levels

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

If people had to kill their own food. There'd be a lot more vegetarians.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Outlawing the dog meat industry is a step in the right direction.

Outlawing just the dog meat industry instead of all meat industry is hypocritical.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

We eat bambi, its our tradition. If they want to eat yellow dog (Nureongi) I say all the power to them.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

We generally eat Ferdinand, Wilbur and Henny Penny. Bambi isn't usually available in stores.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Let them have their dog meat as long as it's sanitary.

What's the problem?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Yeah, no meat eating dog lover wants to admit it's just as cruel to raise cows and pigs for meat. We have an arbitrary definition of animals that are friends vs food. I think this whole anti dog meat thing is an interesting commentary. This is coming from a dog loving and owning meat eater.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Dog meat consumption is a centuries-old practice on the Korean Peninsula and has long been viewed as a source of stamina on hot summer days. It's neither explicitly banned nor legalized in South Korea, but more and more people want it prohibited. There's increasing public awareness of animal rights and worries about South Korea’s international image.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago (6 children)

I haven't met anyone below sixty who eats dog meat. Even if it doesn't get banned, I'm sure the practice will die out within one generation. It's definitely getting rarer and rarer.

It's sad that a fringe, outdated practice reflects poorly on the whole country. Most Koreans love dogs and they're as horrified by the practice as Westerners are.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago (35 children)

I don’t get what’s so horrifying about eating dogs that wouldn’t be just as horrifying when applied to other animals. Why can’t we love other animals just as much as we love dogs?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I agree with you on principle. However, it shouldn't surprise you that people draw a distinction since dogs are often pets and people develop strong emotional bonds with them, whereas very few people have interacted with pigs or cows.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

It doesn’t surprise me, but it does disappoint me. You’d think people would apply the logic they use for dogs to other animals as well, or at least see the hypocrisy.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I am truly and honestly trying to wrap my head around why I feel (as a meat eater) that cows and chickens are okay to eat, but not dogs or cats. For me, I think It's part social conditioning, part perceived intelligence of the animals, part eating habits of the animals themselves (dogs and cats are predators, cows and chickens are prey; pretty consistently, humans will eat the animals that don't eat meat).

As with very many things in humans, the logic doesn't match the emotional decision. I personally don't think there is anything morally wrong with eating meat and I understand that if I'm okay with eating cows, I should also be okay with people eating dogs. But I just can't seem to change that opinion.

What I absolutely can't support is the mistreatment of animals in farming. At the very least, we can respect their lives and respect the things they provide us when we kill them.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I've worked with pigs on an organic farm, and I'm convinced that if people in general spent any amount of time with a happy, relaxed pig, they'd swear off pork altogether. Pigs are extremely smart and sociable, and even have a sense of humor.

That being said, I'm with you, it's the unnecessary suffering that I can't abide. And it's not even a matter of intelligence; chickens are pretty dumb (though they're a lot smarter than people credit them for), and I wouldn't want to see one suffer either. They're sensitive animals all the same, as any basic interaction quickly illustrates. The idea that it's fine to torment an animal because they're dumb is borderline inhuman to me.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

i respect your ability to self-reflect and assess yourself rationally and logically. It’s fine to feel the way you do, as long as you’re aware that your choices may not be rooted in inherent rationality or morality of an action.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Hypocrisy might be the most human trait out of all of them.

load more comments (34 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

I’d like to see them ban other animal meat with just as much fervor.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

People just have different tolerance for how much death is caused by their own existence, your gonna kill something regardless to survive, that is life. I am not really to judge, especially a culture that I have very little interaction with.

load more comments
view more: next ›