this post was submitted on 29 Dec 2023
161 points (97.6% liked)

World News

32327 readers
893 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 33 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Sounds like it was a cooking show with porn star guests where they discussed sex positivity while cooking.

And then they provided links for the porn stars accounts and such in their videos, allowing media to call the cooking show porn with a straight face.

(edit: for the record it appears they did in fact make porn. Still, tame as shit IMO.)

[–] [email protected] 20 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

I read a NYT article on this and the videos included them having sex with the pornstars and they also published their own porn videos.

In an interview on Thursday, Mr. Gow and Ms. Wilson said that they believe they were fired over the videos, which included sex scenes together and with others under the username Sexy Happy Couple. Both said they felt it was wrong for the university to punish them over the videos, arguing that doing so infringes on their free speech rights.

Mr. Gow, 63, said he and his wife, 56, have made videos together for years but had decided recently to make them publicly available on porn websites and had been pleased by the response. They said they never mentioned the university or their jobs in the videos, several of which have racked up hundreds of thousands of views. The couple also has made a series of videos in which they cook meals with porn actors and then have sex.

The article also includes some basic legal history that doesn't make it seem like they will have much recourse.

NYT gift article

[–] [email protected] 12 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Ah, well good for them then. I wonder if they had engaged in underground barefist boxing cage matches if they'd be under the same scrutiny.

But I would've only drawn the line if they were portraying or using the university in any way. Maybe the pearl clutching could extend to if they were making porn while employed by the University, but still.

Thanks for the clarification, nonetheless.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, this is one of those situations I have mixed feelings on. On the one hand, in a perfect world what consenting adults do on their own time wouldn't change perceptions of their competency or leadership.

Unfortunately, we don't live in a perfect world and executive leaders do carry the expectation to keep their private lives private, and if something is public it shouldn't be controversial.

My two cents is that the guy was naive in thinking this wouldn't undermines his executive role as leader of a campus. And naivety isn't a great trait in a leader. But the president shouldn't have made disparaging remarks about him and should simply have left it at a vague "differences in judgement."

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

Ultimately, the only thing that may stand is the fact that the board of regents didn't give him due process in handing down the decision. The announcement was made that the board was firing one of the Chancellors literally a couple hours before handing down the decision. There was no hearing by the board.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 10 months ago (1 children)

According to the article, the board did not publicly reveal why and it's this guy himself who seems to be spilling the beans. Not sure what my take on the matter is other than it's quite funny from afar.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

More people watch it probably? Right?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

This was my thought seeing the headline, any publicity is good publicity as they say

[–] [email protected] 27 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Oh no! Some consenting adults did the secks! Better fire them!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago (2 children)

The University of Wisconsin has a code of ethics that all faculty must adhere to. His participation in creating pornography most likely breached this morality clause, resulting in his termination.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The amorality of consensual sex consensually on camera.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago

Didn't say I agreed with it, but if you sign a code of ethics as part of an employment contract, then you shouldn't be surprised when you're fired for violating it.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

That’s a weird title since that’s explicitly what he was fired for. It’s not just what he says.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 10 months ago

@filoria

It appears Unuversity policy requires faculty to disclose outside activities for which they receive renumeration.

So it seems he wasn't fired because he was producing porn, he was fired because he didn't tell them he was being paid to produce porn.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 10 months ago

This guy just got more money than his pension would have given him.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 10 months ago

Unfortunate we live in such a prudish country.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 10 months ago

I mean if he uploaded it in 240p quality, or rotated sideways, he would totally deserve to be fired.

Also the title had me thinking he was operating a studio or something. I, too, have been known to produce porn, and I wouldn't want to work anywhere that had a problem with it.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


MADISON, Wis. (AP) — Former University of Wisconsin-La Crosse Chancellor Joe Gow said Thursday that the school’s governing board fired him because members were uncomfortable with him and his wife producing and appearing in pornographic videos.

The Universities of Wisconsin Board of Regents, which oversees UW-Madison, UW-La Crosse and 11 other regional campuses, voted unanimously during a hastily convened closed meeting Wednesday evening to fire Gow.

After the vote, Universities of Wisconsin President Jay Rothman and regents President Karen Walsh issued statements saying the regents had learned of specific conduct by Gow that subjected the university to “significant reputational harm.” Rothman called Gow’s actions “abhorrent” and Walsh said she was “disgusted.” But neither of them offered any details of the allegations.

Gow told The Associated Press in a phone interview Thursday morning that regents had discovered that he and his wife, former UW-La Crosse professor Carmen Wilson, had been producing and appearing in pornographic videos.

But Rothman said Wednesday evening that he planned to file a complaint with UW-L’s interim chancellor, Betsy Morgan, seeking a review of Gow’s tenure.

Rothman said in an email to the AP on Thursday morning that Gow failed to act as a role model for students, faculty and the community and mistakenly believes the First Amendment equates to a “free pass to say or do anything that he pleases.”


The original article contains 570 words, the summary contains 224 words. Saved 61%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago

Universities of Wisconsin Board of Regents: predictably, all squares.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Does anyone have links to their videos? News sites never actually post sources :(

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

Pornhub @SexyHappyCouple

I had the wrong link before. I'm really sorry my fellow perverts!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Can't find it, did they take it down or something?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

I fixed the link. My bad!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

Aw nice 👍

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

When the midlife crisis hits

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

Yeah, that'll happen.