this post was submitted on 25 Dec 2023
540 points (98.9% liked)

News

23293 readers
3352 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The FBI is working with law enforcement officials in Colorado in the wake of threats made against state Supreme Court justices who ruled last week to remove Donald Trump from the state’s 2024 presidential ballot.

“The FBI is aware of the situation and working with local law enforcement,” FBI Public Affairs Officer Vikki Migoya said in a statement provided to CNN on Monday. “We will vigorously pursue investigations of any threat or use of violence committed by someone who uses extremist views to justify their actions regardless of motivation.”

A spokesperson for the Colorado Judicial Branch would not comment on reports of threats to the justices, and a message left with the Denver Police Department was not immediately returned Monday afternoon. Master Trooper Gary Cutler, a spokesman for the Colorado State Patrol, said any threats against judges would be handled by local authorities.

In addition to the federal response, state and local law enforcement officials and non-government research groups have been monitoring rhetoric on extremist online forums for signs it might translate to tangible threats to public officials.

all 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 99 points 10 months ago (1 children)

...while Trump himself gets Secret Service protection for life. Go figure.

[–] [email protected] 66 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (6 children)

Imagine getting a Secret Service job and you have to be the first guy to make sure Trump doesn't get shanked in the prison yard.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 10 months ago (1 children)

There's actually a legal question that hasn't been fully resolved : would he keep his secret service protection. Even the secret service has said that it could go either way.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Even if convicted Trump would never end up in anything past Club Fed or house arrest.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Honestly, I just want him deplatformed. I don't care of the cost is letting him live in absolute luxury the rest of his life. He needs to be silenced and at this point justice for his crimes is way less important.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 10 months ago

I want him in a cell for life. The goal isn’t just to stop him but also the next guy.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 months ago

Deplatformed from which platform? When your fanatics are deranged enough to follow you anywhere... They'll be chomping at the bit to hear what he said in his most recent call from prison.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 10 months ago (2 children)

You'd think if the founders imagined a president being so corrupt he would have any services removed, but no the US politics was ratfucked so much Trump was president and gets a soapbox to spouse out more shit than a heard of animals. Maybe the constitution should have some educational amendments added so people can understand what a con man he is. I'm just a neighbor but it's worrying when the largest military in the world gets controlled by someone bothered by people saying he has small hands.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

The secret service didn’t exist when the founders wrote the constitution. It was created in 1865 to investigate counterfeiting, and was assigned to Presidential protection in 1901.

There’s actually nothing in the constitution that gives a former president anything at all. That all came from the former presidents act of 1958.

There was no pension or other benefits, or any protection before then.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Now imagine a secret service officer who absolutely is devoted to Trump and would take a bullet for him without even thinking about it.

Shudder.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

without even thinking about it.

He wouldn't have to; loyalty with Trump is a one-way street.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago

Probably wouldn't happen at a Club Fed, though.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

Don't forget they're cops.

Cops like Trump, generally. Doubt it's hard to find agents that want to be assigned to Trump.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago

"damn I'm gonna eat a lot of McDonald's"

[–] [email protected] 89 points 10 months ago (3 children)

I hope they round up these right wing terrorists. They've been a plight on this country for too long. Getting away with too much. Worse yet, others have spent decades trying to both sides everything, and now we can see how wrong they were, and still are.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago

I hope they (somehow) manage to do it before they can vote in the next presidential election. It's the time of year to ask for a miracle, right?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Cops and Fancy Cops™ aren't going to round up themselves

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

There's only one way to deal with feral hogs...

[–] [email protected] 48 points 10 months ago (4 children)

How to win at life: death threats to supreme court justices. Like wtf? Who even considers that an option, ever?

[–] [email protected] 27 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Brain dead conservative cult members

[–] [email protected] 32 points 10 months ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 months ago

Self-declared, at that

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

I think you're right. People say I use the word "terrorist" too much, but this fits the definition in my opinion.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 10 months ago

People whipped up into a frenzy by bad faith media and demogaugs.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 10 months ago

People with the emotional maturity of a 2 year old, entitled and raised to attack anything they don't like, were never taught ethical principles, nor how to cooperate with others in society, whipped into a angry, rabid frenzy by their religious and political platforms run by wolves who only care about advancing their wealth at the expense of positive progress that will actively help said people and other people in society and limit the overreach of corporations and runaway capitalist exploitation

All because "Joe is a traitor" and "I miss the good ol' days", and often outright -ism (across a myriad of protected categories, race, sex/gender, etc.)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

People who think they're anonymous behind a social media username.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 10 months ago

Narrator: In the end, they never called them terrorists.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 10 months ago

Throw the book at these fucking traitors to the constitution

[–] [email protected] 23 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I don't want to see news about the FBI saying it's looking into this, I want to hear about indictments

[–] [email protected] 10 points 10 months ago

Presumably one part of the purpose for the press release is to try and prevent/reduce additional threats.

"Hey assholes, we are actually watching you."

[–] [email protected] 9 points 10 months ago

Do you think they're helping local law enforcement with their spelling on the death threats?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

Yeah, I’m sure they’re totally on that