Huh. So I guess fusion is only 20 years away.
this post was submitted on 21 Dec 2023
95 points (97.0% liked)
Uplifting News
11284 readers
514 users here now
Welcome to /c/UpliftingNews, a dedicated space where optimism and positivity converge to bring you the most heartening and inspiring stories from around the world. We strive to curate and share content that lights up your day, invigorates your spirit, and inspires you to spread positivity in your own way. This is a sanctuary for those seeking a break from the incessant negativity often found in today's news cycle. From acts of everyday kindness to large-scale philanthropic efforts, from individual achievements to community triumphs, we bring you news that gives hope, fosters empathy, and strengthens the belief in humanity's capacity for good.
Here in /c/UpliftingNews, we uphold the values of respect, empathy, and inclusivity, fostering a supportive and vibrant community. We encourage you to share your positive news, comment, engage in uplifting conversations, and find solace in the goodness that exists around us. We are more than a news-sharing platform; we are a community built on the power of positivity and the collective desire for a more hopeful world. Remember, your small acts of kindness can be someone else's big ray of hope. Be part of the positivity revolution; share, uplift, inspire!
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Give it another 20 years, maybe it'll only be 15 years away then!
Always.
Article is misleading and basically bullshit.
How?
Watch this. https://youtu.be/czjisEGe5Cw?si=O1G6nQdzMQI_Gxac
Hmm, so it basically quotes https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/dec/14/first-edition-nuclear-fusion , which among other things says that the energy produced by the thing is currently unusable (which is what the video quotes at 9:00)
Still feels like a breakthrough
They’ve sort of” – you can hear the pain of this simplification in Bluck’s voice as he speaks – “solved the physics issues, and now they’re looking squarely at the engineering issues.”
Maybe they're upset that this isn't an independent replication by a different group? It's the same facility and group reporting these results because this machine is truly one of a kind.
Well you take a few of the letters out of the title and you can spell bullshit. I guess?
Sounds like every article about fusion ngl