this post was submitted on 06 Dec 2023
334 points (99.4% liked)

politics

19138 readers
3356 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 109 points 11 months ago (6 children)

We need to get rid of riders... Someone propose a "one bill-one item" rule already, and stick that motherfucker on every single fucking bill as a rider until something comes along that'll bait em all into that shit.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 11 months ago (1 children)

perhaps, but combining bills does allow for good ways of compromise… i’ll pass your bill that i don’t agree with if you pass a change to this other thing that addresses my concerns, etc

[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago
[–] [email protected] 16 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Obama did something like that. It didn't work. All the little add ons are so each politician in a contested district can get something for their voters to justify all the other parts of the bill their voters don't like. Without that nothing ever gets passed.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago

"We tried" and then go on recess for 6 weeks

[–] [email protected] 11 points 11 months ago

And like that you've broken the biggest tool legislators have to negotiate marginal votes into their camp

[–] [email protected] 11 points 11 months ago (5 children)

What if I told you that slime ball Matt Gaetz has already proposed this issue multiple times. Not sure how I feel about that but it’s the only sane thing I’ve heard from his side.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Because it would cause gridlock. That's why Gaetz wants to do it. There are too many things to pass one at a time. There are not enough affirmative votes on most single issues to pass anything. You need the little extra things to pull in the politicians who would otherwise not vote for that one thing because their local base doesn't want it.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 55 points 11 months ago (2 children)

The Putin Caucus at work. (Trump is Putin's lapdog. Tell your friends.)

So I guess Moscow Mitch is back.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 11 months ago

He glitched enough times it forced a rebuild of his OS back to Komrad v1.01

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

Republicans/Conservatives are Russian assets.

[–] [email protected] 47 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 11 months ago

Almost as if they where working for china and Russia trying to discredit the us internally but they are or too stupid or too greedy to notice.

Or both

[–] [email protected] 29 points 11 months ago

Useless stupid monkeys. Fight Putin. Fuck Israel (assholes & plenty of their own $$/weapons).

[–] [email protected] 22 points 11 months ago

Trump moved billions for the useless border wall from military funding without consulting the House.

Just do that and write an IOU to the pentagon. Although I'm sure they won't mind. The more Russians Ukraine blows up are less our troops will have to fight in the future.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I am happy to say that Cornyn (R-TX) hates Israel.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Texas passed a law in 2022 preventing Texas from doing business with companies that "boycott Israel" can we somehow get rid of Cruz and Cornyn for this? https://statutes.capitol.texas.gov/Docs/GV/htm/GV.2271.htm

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I hate everyone you mentioned, but Cruz and Cornyn are federal legislators. They don't pass state laws. That's not how it works.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Honestly best thing Republicans have done in the past 20 years. Don't get me wrong Ukraine needs US support, but this is the fault of the dinosaurs that decided Ukrainian and aid support for Israel's genocide are synonymous.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Ukraine support was already under fire, they tried to push it through by attaching it to the Israel package.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

Well I guess in a way they're standing up for their principles? Anyway I just wish Ukrainian aid could just pass without support for Israel's genocide.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 11 months ago (1 children)

This has nothing to do with Israel. Republicans would nuke Gaza if they could.

This is them holding up broadly popular legislation in order to make some stupid demands on "border security" so they can tell their constituents that they basically built a wall.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

Yeah I know. I'm just happy they're fucking themselves over at the expense of Israel's genocide, though it's sad that Ukraine got caught up in the mess.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

They only are giving a damn about that worthless wall.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›