This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
I know for a fact that Tesla puts parts on the road that have not completed validation testing. The majors would refuse deliver of parts at that lifecycle stage and Tesla is shipping them to customers.
They do not give a shit about safety. Tesla is a company that makes stock hype, the cars are an incidental byproduct.
Have people already forgot when they put cars on the road that had pieces of wood ziptied to it, because they ran out of materials? Why would you ever trust that company.
Oh man, do you have a link? Haven't heard that one.
A bit off topic... But it's really weird that you find out a mutual associate is a writer for a living... I know the writer... Didn't know until I clicked this... Hilarious
Wow I can’t believe a car that has its radar prematurely ditched because of Elno’s wishful thinking and relies 100% on a computer vision model, which isn’t even a solved problem, phantom brakes. /s
They were also phantom breaking when they used radar. Surprisingly the amount of phantom breaking has reduced since transitioning to pure computer vision (IME).
At least once a day I’m behind a human driver that does the phantom brake thing.
Sorry, that's just me downshifting.
I just need to hear the wapapapapapapap as I shift into neutral
At least the build quality is still top notch.. 
Damn that's just sad. Especially for that price.
Yeah, it's priced like a Jaguar and built like a Yugo.
More about the files
https://cleantechnica.com/2023/05/28/tesla-100-gb-data-bomb-turned-over-to-handelsblatt/
Handelsblatt (paywall), one of Germany’s top news organizations, says it has received over 100 GB of data from one or more Tesla employees. It broke the story with this headline: “‘My autopilot almost killed me’: Tesla files cast doubt on Elon Musk’s promises.” Those reports suggest that Tesla failed to adequately protect data from customers, employees, and business partners and has received thousands of customer complaints regarding the carmaker’s driver assistance system, according to The Guardian.
That’s not all. Handelsbatt says that included in the data are tables containing more than 100,000 names of former and current employees, including the social security number of CEO Elon Musk, along with private email addresses, phone numbers, salaries of employees, bank details of customers, and secret details from production.
Data protection in Germany is primarily governed by the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). The data protection office in Brandenburg, where Tesla’s European gigafactory is located, described the data leak as massive. “I can’t remember such a scale,” the Brandenburg data protection officer, Dagmar Hartge, told The Guardian.
If such a violation is proved, Tesla could be fined up to 4% of its annual sales, which could be €3.26 billion ($3.5 billion). Just this week, Meta, the parent company of Facebook, was given a record €1.2 billion fine by the EU privacy regulator over its handling of user information and given five months to stop transferring user data to the US. Tesla Data Breach Details
The complaints, which were reported across the US, Europe, and Asia, span from 2015 to March 2022. During this period, Handelsblatt says Tesla customers in the US, Europe, and Asia reported more than 2,400 self-acceleration issues and 1,500 braking problems. These include 139 reports of “unintentional emergency braking” and 383 reports of “phantom stops” from false collision warnings. Other reports are about instances of claimed sudden acceleration, some of which caused cars to end up in a ditch, hit walls, or crash into oncoming vehicles.
How is that news, what with all the accidents they’ve been involved in?
Confirmation that they very much knew about the issues. It's the difference between negligence and recklessness.
Judging by the crash test videos of the Cybertruck, this does not surprise me in the least. Why make cars safe when you could just not save some money?
This is the best summary I could come up with:
Lucasz Krupski leaked data, including customer complaints about Tesla's braking and self-driving software, to German newspaper Handelsblatt in May.
But, in his first UK interview, Mr Krupski told the BBC's technology editor, Zoe Kleinman, he was concerned about how AI was being used - to power Tesla's autopilot service.
Mr Krupski said he had found evidence in company data which suggested that requirements relating to the safe operation of vehicles that had a certain level of autonomous or assistive-driving technology had not been followed.
Tesla has also faced similar probes and questions from agencies including the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration about its autopilot system.
Jack Stilgoe, an associate professor at University College London who researches autonomous vehicles, said Mr Krupski's claims raised wider concerns about the technology.
The UK Government announced plans for an Automated Vehicles Bill to outline a legal framework for self-driving cars in the King's Speech in early November.
The original article contains 520 words, the summary contains 153 words. Saved 71%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!
It's interesting how AutoTLDR bot changed the spelling of his name
