this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2023
21 points (100.0% liked)

UK Politics

3087 readers
162 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both [email protected] and [email protected] .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

[email protected] appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://feddit.uk/post/791723

An open letter reads: "Rather than representing constituents, the Council is concerned that your focus appears to have been firmly on your television show, upcoming book and political manoeuvres to embarrass the Government for not appointing you to the House of Lords."

top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

They're dead right. She's absolutely pulling the piss here.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I wonder how many people would be willing to sign a recall petition if they were aware of what a recall petition was?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A recall petition is only available under very limited circumstances.

https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/sn05089/

Nadine has neither been suspended nor convicted of a crime. So there's no petition.

Even if there were, the threshold for the petition succeeding is only 10% of registered voters. And you can bet that opposition parties would easily he able to drum up that level of support.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So if an MP was to go rogue and say, I dunno, decide to completely ignore their responsibility as an MP there's no way for the people of the constituency to get rid?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's what the law says.

The MP might not be selected by their party to stand in the next election. But there's no law about MPs behaving in a way contrary to the wishes of their electorate.

Indeed, how could an MP do their job properly if there was? If they've got a slim majority there would be almost endless recall petitions from opposition parties.

If they voted against their party, they could be fired by the party against the wishes of the voters.

What bar so you want to set for voters' votes to be invalidated? At the moment we have criminal acts and suspension. What other thresholds would you add - and how would you stop people from abusing them?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

It's not for votes to be invalidated. It's for votes to be retaken in light of new information.

I agree you can't have anybody raising a petition with no controls. That would be too chaotic, but if the councils in the constituency are calling for it, it seems reasonable to allow a petition / poll to recall.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

probably not enough, recall petitions seem to almost impossible

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I've got to think that's hindered by the fact that many have no idea what they are.

Almost like we should be teaching this sort of thing in our schools.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

no way the government would put that on the curriculum