this post was submitted on 04 Dec 2023
17 points (90.5% liked)

United Kingdom

4068 readers
564 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in [email protected] or [email protected]
More serious politics should go in [email protected].

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 2 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 10 points 10 months ago (1 children)

According to Mauritius, the proposal stemmed from a UK decision in the early 1960s to "accommodate the United States’ desire to use certain islands in the Indian Ocean for defence purposes."

Well that's the end of that. The US won't allow any change in the island's status if it is a strategic military post, but it will allow the UK to take the flack diplomatically.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

A diplomatic cable from 2009 published by WikiLeaks quotes Colin Roberts saying "We do not regret the removal of the population" and explains the plan to declare it a marine reserve (which they subsequently did) so that "former inhabitants would find it difficult, if not impossible, to pursue their claim for resettlement on the islands".