this post was submitted on 24 Nov 2023
75 points (98.7% liked)

Astronomy

4122 readers
34 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 77 points 1 year ago

TLDR: meteorite

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Kind of bum that the article did not mention how much it was worth

[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The researchers argue that the Maryborough meteorite is much rarer than gold, making it far more valuable to science.

💀

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Just imagine how many science they could get if they traded it in!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

At least 3.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think their take is kind of questionable. It may be more valuable to science but its monetary value is almost certainly less than gold.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The writing is at morning program levels of goofiness; it's jarring. At 17 kg this meteorite would be worth over a million USD if it was gold. It's like the writer is taking a piss at the poor guy who hoped to get some money out of it.