this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2023
157 points (99.4% liked)

Technology

34728 readers
244 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
all 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Those are dumb fucking patents. I hope Google fights this to the end and gets them invalidated.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Those patents are comically moronic. I normally wouldn’t root for Google, but I hope they get them overturned.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I'm with you. I really hope google goes out of business some day (doubt it), but not like this.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

really dumb patent, Pretty sure DLNA/UPNP media rendering with remote controller and server devices were well established when this "touchstream" mob claim to have patented casting from one device to another.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Yeah, I've been using DLNA for years, and it has been around for much longer. Looks like it has been around for 20-ish years now.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Fuck patent trolls. Patents should only be public domain after a few years and you have to have a working prototype to prove you can even do it.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

Exactly. I'm no fan of Google, but I think patents in general should only last as long as needed to recoup the initial investment.

The same should go for copyright as well.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Of course this is a ruling out of Western Texas. Thankfully Google can appeal to a more sane court and hopefully get this obvious patent troll's verdict thrown out.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I wouldn't be so sure. Google has lost another case with Sonos, also because of patent infringement. This isn't the first nor the last time.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Google should have fought to have the patents invalidated.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm sure they took it to the nonsense ptab

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

Probably filled suite in 2017 and got delayed by Google for years. Idk watching Google rip everything off has made me more of a supporter for patents.