this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2023
77 points (96.4% liked)

Astronomy

4006 readers
2 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Wood doesn't burn or rot in the lifeless vacuum of space, but it will incinerate into a fine ash upon reentry into Earth's atmosphere — making it a surprisingly useful, biodegradable material for future satellites.

Don't metal ones burn up fine?

[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 year ago

No, actually. Metal doesn't burn up, it melts to slag and disintegrates, but the metal particles don't become gas the way carbon does. Then you just have a bunch of a space debris and reactive, aerosolized metal particles knocking around the upper atmostphere. Aluminum Oxide ash can float to the ground, or it can cause ozone decomposition. We're not entirely sure which is worse based on the amount coming back from satellites, but the number of satellites we're sending up is increasing rapidly. So it wouldn't hurt if they were a little less toxic.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

For the most part, yes. The problem is pollution, like aluminum oxide.

Here is an article that explains better than I ever could: https://www.space.com/air-pollution-reentering-space-junk-detected

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

Sounds like a radical achievement if they pull it off.

Nobody else could say they built a wooden space machine and put it into orbit successfully

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

The dream of wooden pirate starships becomes reality!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm curious what kind of fasteners they use

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

Self-sealing stembolts.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Probably dowels, maybe some glue. Doubt they would use threaded fasteners for a demonstration like this.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Darn. Could have been big ammunition in the Phillips vs straighthead war.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ugh, Robertson all the way.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Torx.

The only one actually engineered for its application.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Proprietary sacrilege. I ain't paying extra for a shape. Not to mention, which Torx? There are literally half a dozen varieties.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Source? I can only think of half a half a dozen.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

You, me, and the wikipedia page agree then.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Awe, a little baby Borg cube! Are they going to put an AI on that?