71
submitted 10 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] [email protected] 21 points 10 months ago

Cause the parents need to make the kids ready for school before they themselves drive to work.
If school started later, all jobs would have to start later, too.

[-] [email protected] 14 points 10 months ago

I see no problem with this.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago

Not teens though? They can get ready themselves

[-] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

Depends on the teen, but there's plenty that get ready like old people fuck

[-] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

Would be nicer if school didn't suck ass.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

Ikr?

Like, my kid's school is pretty damn good. waaaaay better than it was when I went there. But it still sucks in a real sense because it's school. You sacrifice a hell of a lot of flexibility and freedom because of the necessity of teaching as many kids as possible in an affordable way. No way to get rid of all the suck, no matter what compromises you pick to get it done.

[-] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I'm skeptical about there being literally no way to fix it. We invented the damn thing.

[-] [email protected] 17 points 10 months ago

Because if you get the kids sleep deprived early in life they won’t notice how overworked and underpaid the system leaves them.

[-] [email protected] 9 points 10 months ago

Students need to unionize. The homework assigned is beyond unreasonable, especially when there are teachers that don't let the students do the homework in class if they finish the in class assignments. When you get out of school you never have this much work to do at a real job. Homework barely even exists in real jobs and you should be paid a premium for it.

Kinda /s ...

[-] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago

One thing that was not addressed in the article is morality. Among the other things I learned during 50 years in the workforce is that sleep is treated as a moral issue.

Choosing to "stay up late" or choosing to "sleep in" are decadent, unless it's a result of late socializing. Choosing to go to bed when tired instead of staying up socializing is antisocial and even an insult to others. Choosing a sleep schedule that is natural and healthy is selfish when it conflicts with the imposed schedule. Not going on-call, taking shift work, or working extended shifts demonstrate the moral failing of a bad work ethic. Students suffering because their circadian rhythms don't match the imposed schedule are lazy or don't care or are unintelligent.

We're not going to fix anything until we treat sleep and sleep schedules as biological imperatives instead of moral decisions.

this post was submitted on 10 Nov 2023
71 points (98.6% liked)

Public Health

360 readers
2 users here now

For issues concerning:


🩺 This community has a broader scope so please feel free to discuss. When it may not be clear, leave a comment talking about why something is important.



Related Communities

See the pinned post in the Medical Community Hub for links and descriptions. link ([email protected])


Rules

Given the inherent intersection that these topics have with politics, we encourage thoughtful discussions while also adhering to the mander.xyz instance guidelines.

Try to focus on the scientific aspects and refrain from making overly partisan or inflammatory content

Our aim is to foster a respectful environment where we can delve into the scientific foundations of these topics. Thank you!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS