this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2023
63 points (93.2% liked)

politics

19104 readers
2441 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

President Joe Biden is promoting new cash for Amtrak

President Joe Biden — perhaps the nation's biggest Amtrak fan — is set to promote new federal investments for trains on the heavily trafficked Northeast Corridor.

The Democratic president is headed to Bear, Delaware, on Monday to announce more than $16 billion in new funding that will go toward 25 passenger rail projects between Boston and Washington, the White House says. Bear is located about 12 miles (20 kilometers) from Biden's home of Wilmington.

His remarks will be held at the Amtrak Bear Maintenance Shops, where trains are maintained and repaired. The investments, the White House says, will help trains run faster, cut delays and create union jobs.

top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (4 children)

As mentioned in another post: isn't Amtrak a private company? Have you ever priced out a train journey? It's cheaper to drive.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago

It's cheaper to drive

A feature of Amtrak being privatized unfortunately.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

From https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amtrak :

Founded in 1971 as a quasi-public corporation to operate many U.S. passenger rail routes, Amtrak receives a combination of state and federal subsidies but is managed as a for-profit organization.

So it seems like Amtrak is run as if it is a private company, but it was established by the government. Calling it "for-profit" is also rather generous, because it relies on that government funding, and even with that, doesn't really have any profits to speak of.

It is basically government subsidy of intercity passenger rail in the US to keep it from dying.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

The intent was for Amtrak to be a for profit company. The problem is that passenger rail was a money loser for a long time before the collapse of Penn Central.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Every now and then I look into train tickets to the state my parents live, and every time it's cheaper and faster to take a plane

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Same. You see videos like from Technology Connections and think about how neat it would be and then you look and it's $900 one way across the country. Round trip plane ticket would be under $700.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

It's cheaper to drive.

Not necessarily. Getting there, sure. But once you're in an urban core having a car with you becomes less of an asset and more of a liability.