this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2023
397 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

59039 readers
3181 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

tl/dr: email chains used as evidence in DOJ Google antitrust case show internal arguments about drops in # of searches, and how to increase them so that people see more ads. Search team wants to create better search results to keep people coming back.

Advertising team wants to find any way to make people search for as long and as often as possible ("increasing the journey length") even if it means delivering less relevant search results.

You can actually read many of the trial documents here -
https://www.justice.gov/atr/us-and-plaintiff-states-v-google-llc-2020-trial-exhibits

this file was particularly interesting. https://www.justice.gov/d9/2023-11/417557.pdf

all 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 122 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Advertising team wants to find any way to make people search for as long and as often as possible (“increasing the journey length”) even if it means delivering less relevant search results.

i now understand what i've been seeing a whole lot better.. any time marketing starts interacting directly with engineering, your tech company is in trouble..

[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 year ago

And this is why I consider advertisers leeches. Anything to get more crap shoved in our faces no matter what it costs us, not them.

[–] [email protected] 100 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well it sure does sound like advertising won doesn’t it. I completely stopped using Google it is so bad now.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

Money talks ☹️

[–] [email protected] 72 points 1 year ago (1 children)

marketing is up there with the most useless, scummiest professions

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

First thing that popped into my mind was his bit. thx for linking

[–] [email protected] 62 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Advertising and marketing always get in the way of engineering

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

And legal/ compliance, too

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Legal getting in the way of engineering is usually a very good thing.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

software engineer in a medium-large public tech company, i agree. i can’t even imagine the amount of stress the legal team must be under to constantly be discovering what management and engineering have messed up this time…and discover the problem is 6 months old and if a regulator catches wind of it it’ll be painful.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I was actually thinking about the goal of those laws, protecting society from unbridled capitalist tech companies. The fear of regulators is only an intermediate tool.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

i personally see them as different tools of the same end goal - wealth generation in a checked and sustainable manner. capitalist environments inspire innovation, but require boundaries set (regulators) and a political environment which is alert and aware of exploitation and can make the calls about what is or is not acceptable.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Constant minefield and multi-shift alliances.

I lead web applications.

Last year, I + legal team was in a war with ad team because they were whining about tracking during the CCPA rollout.

This year, it's me + ad vs legal team over them wanting to slap compliance notices everywhere that affects user experience.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 year ago (1 children)

After reading all this stuff, I stopped advertising and have started going to independent sources for traffic. Advertising on podcasts has been fruitful.

I’m kinda done advertising on social media and search. It all feels… ick

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I believe podcast advertising is way down across the industry.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yeah, I see why, it’s the same audience. Your first ad run will be your biggest performer and it diminishes from there.

You have to cast wider and be infrequent with your ads. It’s been a learning curve.

There’s a lot of traffic out there to find but yeah, a lot of that traffic is from social and search, which gives you as an advertiser 3rd tier quality results if you advertise on websites.

Having to get creative. Need to pay sites that monitor traffic and find the ones that get a lot of direct traffic. Now getting an ad on those sites has been tough too. It’s been a grind but worth it so far.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I've decided to just pay Kagi for my search. I had completely forgotten how it feels to search somethingand actually find it

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I have a question if you don’t mind, can you use the same account on multiple devices? I use 3 computers throughout the day and don’t want to pay 3x because is this.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

I use it on my desktop, laptop, cell, and two TVs, you should be fine

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

Yep. No problem

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Why not just use SearXNG? They basically do the same thing.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Up next: should you cut off and eat your own limbs if you're really hungry?

No, I mean like, really hungry.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

The old saying is: "Cut off your nose to spite your face"

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Objectively speaking: it would higher your chances of survival.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think the blood loss and infection risk may be a problem. I think they may have speculated about it in academia though, not sure what the outcome was.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, and if you're that hungry that the meat would save your life, you're in no state to recover from such a devastating wound. Your immune system and ability to generate new blood would be severely compromised.

And then there's the added mental toll of coping with the lost limb and having to learn to use it, whilst you're already dizzy from hunger and blood loss, so any chances at other food would be much harder to exploit.

I think objectively it would make your situation much worse.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Oh that's right. Didn't think of that.