Did you not make it to the end of my comment?

I went from abstract concepts that can inform what we think will happen, to direct examples from the middle east, including his own speech about gazans themselves.

We have no indication that trump would deviate from current stance on supporting Israeli or Saudi objectives, including with funding. He did that while he is in office, so funding is a moot point.

Though Afghanistan certainly turned into a mess, I think we should be happy we left. The issues for me on that relate to supporters/translators that we should have gotten out. But that's the cold nature of the MIC and certainly wouldn't be any different if trump had won. You think trump would care about some "nobody" who got left behind? Obviously not, he's described American soldiers who die or are captured as losers, so another moot point in my book.

Of course its the red head

Get on that united card

Got a lil tzeetch on ya

Mother fucker

I demand roe.

Democrats are the most viable way to get it.

Cry

To much word!

None, it's an abstract to highlight what was (during the trump presidency) and what is (the trump judicial appointment consequences).

To be closer to Gaza, we can look at the koshoggi assassination inaction, the soleimani assassination, and the infamous "Muslim ban" to gain contextual basis for trump's expected stance on anything Gaza related.

There's lots of rambling talk by trump on the middle east, but as example related to my list, this article describes his opinion of gazans pretty well. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/oct/17/trump-muslim-ban-gaza-refugees

It is in so much as anyone can look at what trump did in his first term, and what the consequences of that term have been. Such as roe

I don't think it's relevant to compare abortion pre 2000 to post.

So with that caveat, when was there congressional support? Enough votes in both the house and Senate? With president ready to sign?

Weebs I think