[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

(Scusa il papiro)

Sono d'accordo che la quantità di dati che consegnamo volontariamente o senza saperlo ai giganti della tecnologia sia troppo alto, ma c'é un abisso tra lo scenario attuale e quello che viene proposto qui.

Prima di tutto finora i dati finiscono in mani –passami il termine – "benevole", nel senso che sono sì enormi aziende con troppo potere, ma il loro scopo è venderci roba, non farci attivamente del male. Questo significa che sono interessati solo a certi aspetti delle nostre vite, quelli da cui possono trarre profitto. In più i dati non consistono in uno schedario unico contenente un profilo completo di ogni persona, ma in spezzoni frammentari che vengono aggregati con quelli di altre persone per verificare trend e preferenze generali. È sicuramente possibile costruire un profilo completo di un individuo con tutti quei dati, ma ci vuole molto lavoro e accesso a un numero enorme di dati di varie compagnie. In più diciamolo, è possibile semplicemente evitare i prodotti più anti-privacy (smartwatch che mandano dati di salute, assistenti per la casa che ascoltano sempre.. non sono esattamente essenziali) e chi vuole può trovare alternative per molte altre cose. Niente di drastico come andare a vivere nei boschi.

L'eccesso di sorveglianza di cui si parla qui invece, del tipo "la tua tv ti guarda mentre dormi" è ancora in larga parte illegale, fa scandalo quando casi isolati vengono scoperti ed applicazioni generalizzate esistono ancora solo nei piani futuri di CEO e agenzie di sicurezza. Non è impossibile mantenere la situazione così, in cui la privacy è sì erosa, ma non al punto che tutti sappiano automaticamente cos'hai mangiato ieri sera o com'è fatta la tua camera da letto.

Per finire, parlando di cambiamenti futuri, è improbabile ma comunque plausibile che sul lungo termine il mercato dei dati ad un certo punto crolli e che improvvisamente questo tipo di erosione della privacy non porti più vantaggi economici. A quel punto sarebbe un vero peccato aver rinunciato interamente alla privacy perché "tanto non ce l'abbiamo comunque".

[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Precisamente, la morale può cambiare molto. Chissà quali tue abitudini, idee e comportamenti potrebbero col tempo diventare inaccettabili, illegali, o prese di mira da gruppi estremisti/un governo che prevarichi le proprie competenze/la società in generale che viene a saperne attraverso una grossa fuga di dati. Nessuno ha voglia di vivere la propria vita come se fosse continuamente su un palcoscenico, ma le conseguenze sono potenzialmente molto peggiori di un semplice fastidio. Per fare un esempio, negli stati uniti da un giorno all'altro l'aborto è diventato illegale in molti stati e i dati delle app per il tracciamento del ciclo possono incriminare una donna. Il concetto di vita privata protegge da conseguenze negative future.

[-] [email protected] 22 points 6 months ago

How do the Tumbleweed Folks among us deal with this?

We generally don't add many third party repos and we set repository priorities. If I understand this correctly, you are currently using official openSUSE packages and your upgrade is prompting you to upgrade them by changing vendor to this home:wolfi repo. If you want to keep the original packages, you just need to set priorities: in YaST 's "Software Repositories" page for instance, you can select a repo and see what its priority is (99 is the lowest priority, 1 is the highest). You could for instance put the official repos at 95 priority and the wolfi repo at 99. This way, packages will remain set on the official repos even if there are new versions on the other repo.

However, if you have packages that you want to get from the wolfi repo but are also in the official repos, with this method you will be asked to change those packages to the official repos, the inverse situation compared to your issue. You can tell the system to keep those packages from your chosen repo, I do it by choosing a version on the YaST Software page.

[-] [email protected] 12 points 7 months ago

Oh COME ON. Where was this when my laptop died a month ago? I had to replace it asap and the previous kde slimbook was already out of stock. I got a great tuxedo, but this one is the same price and much better specs... I have the worst timing. Great news for everyone else though!

[-] [email protected] 22 points 7 months ago

This video is criticising Lunduke, it isn't made by him

[-] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago

According to this study a mealworm farm uses more energy per kg of protein produced compared to chicken, but much less energy than any other meat. However, mealworm farms rank lowest in CO₂-equivalent emissions per kg of protein and lowest in land use compared to all meat products, including chicken.

Apparently soy beans produce 6.82 kg of CO₂-equivalent per kg of protein isolate (which is 90% protein, therefore 7,5 kg of CO₂-equivalent per kg of protein), while mealworm farms produce 14 kg of CO₂-equivalent per kg of protein (and around 30 kg for chicken, the next best option). Worse, but less than double.

As for land use, the first study calculates that to produce 1kg of protein from mealworms it is necessary to use 18 square meters of land per year (including the land to grow food for the worms) while according to this other study vegetable proteins need up to 25 square meters of land per year for each kg of protein.

I admit it's not as big a difference in land use as I thought (it's different studies, they might have slightly different metrics) , but I think there are other factors that make it a much more complicated issue: mass use of fertilizers, monocultures, deforestation, soil impoverishment... An advantage of mealworms might be that you can give them a variety of foods that are easier on the soil (the first study mentioned carrots, grains and other stuff) in order for them to produce protein, while protein-heavy plants require rich soil and tend to drain it fast.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I really don't think it's a matter of "haters". It might be more logical and consistent if you have no other frames of reference, but most Plasma users come over from other OSs who all use double click (Windows, Mac, even Gnome). If a new user blindly tries KDE and keeps accidentally opening everything while trying to select it's just an immediate and big annoyance. It's not even clear that it isn't a bug because there is no clear explanation of how to select and how to open.

Edit: we are of course all used to single clicking on touch screens, but there it is contrasted with the long press to see options and some "select mode" for file management. There is no system that works exactly like Plasma single-click, which makes it disorienting.

[-] [email protected] 12 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

No, there are those big plus signs appearing on the top-right corner of the icon, if you click there it selects instead of opening. I guess it's a matter of habit, I can't get used to it

[-] [email protected] 13 points 7 months ago

The whole eating insects idea is motivated by carbon emissions and similar concerns: insect meal is around 60-70% protein (beans are around 30%, maybe bean meal is more but I have never seen it anywhere), and its cost in terms of emissions and land use is much smaller than either meat or plants (especially stuff like soy). Nobody is arguing that it should replace beans. Rather, it could help diminish meat consumption.

[-] [email protected] 15 points 7 months ago

After 4 years on btrfs I haven't had a single issue, I never think about it really. Granted, I have a very basic setup. Snapper snapshots have saved me a couple of times, that aspect of it is really useful.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago

I broke it the same way years ago! And now I haven't updated openSUSE Tumbleweed in 4 months and I know I won't have any issues when I do, there's no rush!

20
submitted 11 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

I use my own custom keyboard layout based on the US International layout that adds in all the symbols needed to write in all Latin script European languages, such as č, ħ, ð, ş, ł, l·l, ő, ů... Most are created via dead keys, others such as ø, æ, ə are added into the third and fourth levels (AltGr and Shift). I find it very useful as I write in different language and have to input a lot of names from all over the world for work. It's not optimized for any language, but is reasonably easy to use for all of them.

Originally I had used a keyboard layout creator on Windows, but when it came to recreate it on Linux I had to resort to editing system files: I mapped every key by duplicating and editing one of the layouts found in the /usr/share/X11/xkb/symbols/us file, gave it a new name and then edited /usr/share/X11/xkb/rules/base to add the name of the new layout. Logout, login again and there the new layout was, perfectly functional.

This system is not practical at all though, especially because some updates (not all) rewrite the files and revert my keyboard to normal US international, so I have to copy-paste the layout again. Plus, I don't know if xkb is one day going to be deprecated, as it is part of X11, leaving me without my layout.

Is there any "proper" way to create a layout and have it recognized by Plasma possibily without editing system files?

[-] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

I agree, all these preferences (currency, time, date, measurements) shouldn't need to fit in a determined locale box, but if you customize them it's possible to run into issues. I believe choosing English (Ireland) might solve your issue? Either that or I have found a way to customize it way back and then forgot.

view more: next ›

deliriousn0mad

joined 1 year ago