Because no one should sign new agreements with terrorist states?

For actors or in general? I can't imagine leaving perpetually with a clock ticking on my main source of income.

That's why decent rulers have a 0 and a margin:

Your rulers start at 1? That sounds annoying.

Fiber is dirty cheap, just saying. If you consider externalities, much cheaper than starlink. You just want us to subsidise your lifestyle.

Of course they were eastern gray squirrels. America never sends their best.

Has long as you don't go full German and get them in liter, whatever floats your boat.

That's not how batteries work (at least not with the results seen in this case).

You mean the article that includes the quote explaining why it's not a thing:

, "Bi lighting often feels ubiquitous, even when there isn't a hint of bisexuality in sight [...] These are the colors of magic in fantasy, alien landscapes in sci-fi, and the neon lighting of cyberpunk settings and nightclubs. Thus, while Twitter users and media critics have noted bi lighting in John Wick 3, Blade Runner 2049, Color Out of Space, Orphan: First Kill, Bingo Hell, Men in Black: International, Bullet Train and Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse, there's often a less gay logic for doing so."

TLDR: the prevalence of examples where pink and blue light are used together without wanting to represent bisexuality make it useless as an indicator (at least on its own)

I don't known why people malign the poor core so much. It killed way less people than it was designed to do.

Escalating from a knife fight to a gun fight, especially with bystanders around, doesn't make it better.

Releasing a new full price sandbox game instead of keeping supporting the old one (even if it's mostly in the form of DLCs) is not good for the gamers.