433
submitted 6 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ca/post/17439723

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ca/post/17439722

Palestinian Territory – Israel’s army has again massacred Palestinian civilians who had gathered in Gaza to obtain humanitarian aid, targeting them with gunfire from helicopters, tanks, and drones near the Kuwait roundabout on the outskirts of Gaza City. This incident has resulted in over 60 deaths and 160 injuries, some of which are critical.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] -3 points 6 months ago

Not really, pretty much no Arab country respects human rights. Israel does (of course if you are Israeli citizen and not Palestinian).

Despite that, it’s still far better than any country close to it.

[-] [email protected] 11 points 6 months ago

“Respects human rights as long as you’re the right kind of human” is hardly something to be proud of

[-] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago

If you don't have human rights for a land's native population; you are a country that infringes on human rights. It's very simple. Plus, Palestine is a secular nation and it borders other secular nations like Lebanon (well at least the region of Palestine does). Unlike the country that believes in "old testament justice."

Even in Jordan, which is NOT a secular country, as long as you don't display physical affection in public (which is frowned upon on all groups) you'll be fine. I have even heard of white gay people moving to Amman because they said the people there mind their own business (I can't find the link to this anymore).

[-] [email protected] -3 points 6 months ago

Well, you stated that in Amman people mind their own business when talking about gays, in Israel gays can adopt children. Does any other country around recognize gay relationships and allow them to adopt children? Are pride parades allowed anywhere in the region (apart from Israel)?

About Lebanon: maybe it is a secular country but still has been marked as an authoritarian regime by economist with a score of 3.56 (for comparison, Israel has a score of roughly 7.9). So I don't think we have to argue which regime is more oppressive towards the citizens.

You also mentioned that each country should have human rights for native population. I do not necessarily understand how that applies to Israel. Israel has laws for their citizens and Palestinian authorities have laws for Palestinians. The fact Palestinian government oppresses their people with their laws is not Israel's fault. There are many things Israel is guilty of but this is not one of them.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Palestinians live under Israeli Occupation and 50 years of dispossession. Palestinians are denied civil rights and subject to Military Court

At the mercy of Settler Violence, Torture and Abuse in Interrogations, have No freedom of movement, and also denied Water stolen and extorted by the occupying forces.

Palestinian Labor is also heavily exploited as they have no workers rights either: Haaretz, MEE, 972, CMEC

Gaza is under control by Israel's Blockade which is still internationally recognized as Occupation.

[-] [email protected] -1 points 6 months ago

They are not Israeli citizens.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

Let's take a look at the history of Arab Israelis within Israel proper. First, after the 1948 ethnic cleansing, the remaining Palestinian population within the new Israel were subject to Israel Martial Law and Defence (Emergency) Regulations, later practiced in the occupied territories after 1967.

Even today Arab Israelis are discriminated against as second class citizens including Education (2001 report).

Not nearly as brutal as Palestinians living in East Jerusalem, the West Bank, or Gaza, but they all live under Israeli Military Control. This is Apartheid, by international definitions.

Three main international treaties prohibit and/or explicitly criminalize apartheid: the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (ICERD), the International Convention on the Suppression and Punishment of the Crime of Apartheid (Apartheid Convention) and the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (Rome Statute).

Amnesty lays this out very well in the first chapter of its report.

Amnesty International Report

Human Rights Watch Report

B'TSelem Report with quick Explainer

[-] [email protected] -1 points 6 months ago

That still does not change the fact they are not Israeli citizens.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Yes, that's the point of the apartheid. Glad we agree.

Here's a small fraction of just the summary of the Amnesty report. If you want details you will have to read it. Otherwise I do know of some videos that lay it out too.

Building on a growing body of work, Amnesty International has documented and analysed Israel’s institutionalized and systematic discrimination against Palestinians within the framework of the definition of apartheid under international law. This has aimed to determine whether discriminatory and exclusionary Israeli laws, policies and practices against Palestinians amount to apartheid as a violation of public international law, a serious human rights violation and a crime against humanity. It has done so by firstly determining Israel’s intent to oppress and dominate all Palestinians by establishing its hegemony across Israel and the OPT, including through means of demography, and maximizing resources for the benefit of its Jewish population at the expense of Palestinians. It has then analysed the laws, policies and practices which have, over time, come to constitute the main tools for establishing and maintaining this system, and which discriminate against and segregate Palestinians in Israel and the OPT today, as well as controlling Palestinian refugees’ right to return. It has conducted this analysis by examining the key components of this system of oppression and domination: territorial fragmentation; segregation and control through the denial of equal nationality and status, restrictions on movement, discriminatory family reunification laws, the use of military rule and restrictions on the right to political participation and popular resistance; dispossession of land and property; and the suppression of Palestinians’ human development and denial of their economic and social rights. Furthermore, it has documented specific inhuman and inhumane acts, serious human rights violations and crimes under international law, committed against the Palestinian population with the intent to maintain this system of oppression and domination.

[-] [email protected] -1 points 6 months ago

Palestinians are not Israeli citizens, hence it’s not an apartheid.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

Only if you make up your own definitions, ignore the multiple international definitions of Apartheid, and the reality of the occupation..

[-] [email protected] -1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

What did I make up and what part is occupied?

[-] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

Palestinians are not Israeli citizens, hence it’s not an apartheid.

The Occupied Palestinian Territories are occupied..

I provided links for everything, no need take my word for it.

[-] [email protected] -1 points 6 months ago

I am asking because when talking about illegally occupied territories, they are officially undisputed.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

Yeah, because Israel doesn't treat the West Bank and Gaza as trash.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

They do, but Palestinians are not Israeli citizens.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

Gay parides aren't enough for me to consider Israelis humanitarians. Though it's nice they allow gay people to adopt.

[-] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago

It may not be enough but it’s still objectively better than any other country around.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Edit: Ok, I think I replied to the wrong post.

If you can't see that treating 10 to 15 million people is wrong (literally raping children) I don't see why you are discussing the few gay couples with kids. What exactly is objectively better. Even before this October crap, at least one Palestinian child died per hour.

[-] [email protected] -1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

May I ask which 10-15 million people are mistreated? Edit: grammar fix

this post was submitted on 15 Mar 2024
433 points (92.9% liked)

World News

38569 readers
2320 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS