this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2024
280 points (97.6% liked)

World News

39023 readers
2435 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

MOSCOW (Reuters) - Russian lawmakers have submitted a draft bill to the State Duma that would rewrite a chapter of history by nullifying the Soviet decision in 1954 to transfer Crimea from Russia to Ukraine.

The move appears aimed at establishing a legal basis for Russia to argue that Crimea, the Black Sea peninsula which it claims to have annexed from Ukraine in 2014, was never really part of Ukraine to begin with.

The draft, submitted by a lawmaker from each of Russia's two houses of parliament, describes the 1954 handover as arbitrary and illegal because no referendum was held and Soviet authorities had no right to transfer territory from one constituent republic to another without consent.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 53 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Yep. And it should go to Ukraine.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Lmao. As a firm supporter of Ukraine in this conflict, the sentiment is nice but giving them a permanent seat on the world security council is ridiculous. Neither their economic nor military power warrants that, many much more powerful and influential countries don’t get a permanent seat.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Could be wrong, but I assumed it was a joke

[–] [email protected] 11 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I'm german, we don’t do so well with humor.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

To be fair, it's easy to miss sarcasm and dry humour in text. I do it all the time =)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

German humour is no laughing matter.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Nice sentiment, but that would be a pretty absurd choice. It would be nice to have a South American or African permanent member, or perhaps India.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Id say give India a few years before deciding. Modi isn't steering them in the best direction as of late.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

I suggested them not because I'm a Modi stan but because there's a much stronger case for their geopolitical importance.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago

The AU just got a seat on the G20, just sayin

[–] [email protected] -5 points 8 months ago

Pfft lol

It would be more absurd not to give it to Ukraine