this post was submitted on 10 Mar 2024
706 points (93.0% liked)

News

23644 readers
4125 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A 6th grade girls team from Kentucky was set to go for the year-end championship tournament, but was told they were banned due to fears boys teams might 'retaliate' if they lost to the girls team.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 179 points 9 months ago (4 children)

Once again, girls are somehow responsible for boys’ inability to behave 🤦

[–] [email protected] 19 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Once again there appears to be more to this story than the poor quality article linked suggests.

[–] [email protected] 54 points 9 months ago

Here's the quotes:

SWOB President Tom Sunderman expressed concern in a statement:

"Doing this for 28 years, what we have worried about is a boys team losing to a girls team (especially in the year end tourney), they may get frustrated and retaliate against a girl." "Then we have liability issues.” Prez, a social media user on X (Formerly Twitter), didn't buy it.

"What he meant to say was they can’t have their boys being emasculated by a better girls team… it would be a blow to their developing manhood to get beat by girls."

What context am I missing?

[–] [email protected] 12 points 9 months ago

Retaliating against your opponents for beating you in a game isn't normal, but on Patriarchy it is.

Patriarchy, not even once.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Once again, girls are somehow responsible for boys’ inability to behave

That's really not what i am getting from this article at all.

made the call because they believed that 11 to 12-year-old girls and boys competing against each other on the court could pose a liability risk leading to violence, even though the girls team had been winning 7-1 all season without incident.

they may get frustrated and retaliate against a girl.” "Then we have liability issues.”

McGraw said the girls were never in any real danger during the games, aside from the occasional side-eye.

"They got giggles, they got laughs, and people talked about them... you know, the looks."

[emphasis added]

Where "once again" is the boys inability to behave? All i see is adults wanting to dodge POTENTIAL liability.


Beyond that there is the question about their participation in the league itself. Here there are as i see it two sides:

  • They participated through deception (listing as mail AND apparently fielding a male team in the first game)

  • Or one can be on the side that the system is broken and they should have been allowed to participate in the first place.

Again something that adults decide. Not sure if we have enough information to judge this properly.


Not sure why i spend much time on this nonesense, especially since i find this to be a pretty poor article (as is any that just randomly quotes social media users to make its point).